Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for облачный танцор

Channel

облачный танцор

@cloudddancer

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

303subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001796163460
TypeChannel
Username@cloudddancer
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/cloudddancer

Growth

302303302.57 August 2026 — 302 subscribers8 August 2026 — 302 subscribers14 August 2026 — 303 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 6 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 302–303 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 01:13303+1
8 Aug 2026, 08:01302no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:37302first reading

Engagement

4 posts held, back to 11 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 4 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
7s
Average length
7s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

94 reactions across 4 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2728.7%
custom 57647538654549177801819.1%
custom 60508227305954418611111.7%
🍌1010.6%
❤‍🔥88.51%
custom 576515558233604797877.45%
custom 576512478742053556166.38%
custom 605102456828854881344.26%
custom 576471880993184790511.06%
custom 576499693912903468611.06%
custom 576509742418389249111.06%

Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 4 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 94reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 4 most recent posts we hold, published 11 May 2026 to 19 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

19 Jun 2026, 08:54 UTC202 views24 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

за июнь прожила сотню жизней, а завтра в цикории будет ивент

custom 605082273059544186186custom 57651247874205355616custom 60510245682885488134

31 May 2026, 10:04 UTC411 views24 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

трансформация хайлайты 🫨

🍌98custom 57647538654549177803custom 60508227305954418613custom 57650974241838924911

22 May 2026, 14:17 UTC342 views26 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

проект про палку в Национальном центре современных искусств Беларуси при покупке билета тебе дают выбрать свою палку, потом по штрихкоду печатается текст «досье на вашу палку-питомца» ну и дальше куча приколов давно не видела такой непосредственности в официальной институции

custom 576475386545491778012❤‍🔥8custom 57651555823360479784🍌1custom 57647188099318479051

11 May 2026, 14:41 UTC309 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

смоукинг эриа — в аэропорту Самарканда 🍿

13custom 57647538654549177803custom 57651555823360479783custom 57649969391290346861

Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @cloudddancer. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“облачный танцор” (@cloudddancer), 303 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cloudddancer.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.