Channel
@clockeswag
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
295subscribers
+7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002177468718 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @clockeswag |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 27 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/clockeswag |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Aug 2026, 20:13 | 295 | +2 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 22:13 | 293 | +5 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:18 | 288 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:55 | 288 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 11 (5 August 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 867 |
| Reactions total | 84 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 08:18 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
84 reactions across 11 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5992400279037809021 | 42 | 50.0% | |
| custom 5337282436273296750 | 10 | 11.9% | |
| custom 5334964773136130692 | 9 | 10.7% | |
| custom 5226574431538666407 | 8 | 9.52% | |
| 🤣 | 6 | 7.14% | |
| custom 5332388832140619044 | 5 | 5.95% | |
| custom 5345823816260010485 | 3 | 3.57% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 1.19% |
Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 84reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
лучше бы послушали последний альбом вилиана. это реально обалденный альбом. знаете, я прям искренне рада, что он выпустил не туфту трендовую, а свой звучок. очень хорошо мне зашел. я целый день его слушаю на репите. красиво и меланхолично #админ_слушал
custom 53372824362732967505🔥1
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 52265744315386664072custom 59924002790378090211
нет правда моё главное упущение во всех свиданках это то что я никогда ни с кем не сидела без кринжа и не слушала свою музыку наслаждаясь ей и не думая о том что мне бы стоило ее пролистать вот чтоб вы сидели и вдвоем её знали и вайбили и ваще вот бы был чечик который такой блииин ты тоже любишь мит компьютер ппц я тоже давай поцелуемся #пикми2026 #админ_слушал
custom 59924002790378090215custom 53323888321406190442custom 52265744315386664071
ща бы этот трек слушать в романтическом настроении где-то на закате на набережной и жевать сладулю и цематься вот бы уже когда-то #да_будет_так #админ_слушал
custom 59924002790378090214custom 52265744315386664071custom 53349647731361306921
#лукедок
custom 59924002790378090216custom 52265744315386664071custom 53372824362732967501
#плёнкедок пленка была lunafilm, фотопппарат мой кодак. но все таки мне кажется, что барахлит старичок
custom 59924002790378090218custom 52265744315386664073
#допрос_админа (5) Насколько ты спонтанна? Делаешь ли ты спонтанные и необдуманные поступки? Насколько часто? когда я думаю, что поступаю спонтанно, я получаю реакцию от близких по типу «эээ ну это было ожидаемо». поэтому хз! мне нравится порой делать что-то глупое или резкое, но я не могу себя назвать прям супер спонтанным человеком. хотя стремлюсь к такому, потому что хотелось бы сбросить с себя оковы вековых уст…
🤣6custom 53458238162600104853custom 53349647731361306921custom 59924002790378090211
сегодня настрик такой!!! В) #админ_слушал
custom 53349647731361306922
#допрос_админа (4) кем вы работаете? руководитель пиар отдела в биологическом музее ❤️ задать квесшн
custom 59924002790378090214
#допрос_админа (3) Как ты придумываешь идеи для тик токов и вообще хочешь ли набрать 1000000 подписчиков 😅 просто вспоминаю какие-то события из жизни или придумываю на ходу жизнявое и мемное. порой что-то и записываю себе в заметки, чтобы потом подснять. мне кажется, в этом 0 чего-то необычного про мильон подписчиков — да, без шуток, хочу. сейчас у меня 755 человек в аккаунте, но я жду свою первую 1000. мне кажется…
custom 53372824362732967504custom 59924002790378090214
#допрос_админа (1) интересно саша смотрел бумер или бригаду эээ касательно санька не знаю, но лично я смотрела и то, и другое (2) подкатывали ли к тебе подписчики канала нууу было бы глупо писать «оо нееет ни разу». конечно, были знаки внимания, но прям кринжовых подкатов была парочка наверное. был один извращ. был парень, который звал на свидание (я отказала, потому что общалась тогда с другим челом…#сглупила). …
custom 59924002790378090219custom 53349647731361306925custom 53323888321406190443
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @clockeswag. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“clockedok ฅ^•ﻌ•^ฅ” (@clockeswag), 295 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/clockeswag.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.