3 measurements spanning 16 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 101–102 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
22 Aug 2026, 09:45
102
+1
9 Aug 2026, 10:16
101
no change
6 Aug 2026, 16:26
101
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 11 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
11.8%
avg views ÷ 102 subscribers
Avg views / post
12.0
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.25%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 3 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held
20 (11 December 2025 – 8 August 2026)
Views total
36
Reactions total
2
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
9 Aug 2026, 10:16 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
31 reactions across 19 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
25
80.6%
❤
3
9.68%
👏
3
9.68%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 31reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 December 2025 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
دائم خود را سرزنش میکند، اما در تصمیمگیری بلاتکلیف است.
انگار سوژه حاضر است همهی گناهان را به گردن بگیرد، اما مسئولیت نپذیرد.
افرادی که در دام سوپرایگو میافتند، بهسختی تصمیم میگیرند.
سوپرایگوی خشن و تنبیهگر، بهجای آنکه سوژه را به سمت پذیرش مسئولیت سوق دهد، میتواند او را در چرخهای از احساس گناه و خودسرزنشگری گرفتار کند؛ تا جایی که فرد بهجای پذیرفتن مسئولیتِ انتخاب و میل خود، مدام خود را محکوم کند.
@cli…
افسرده، دیگریِ غایب را به درون خود میآورد؛
و سپس به خاطرِ غیبتش، به او حمله میکند.
اما دیگری دیگر حضور ندارد.
پس این خودِ اوست که آماجِ یورش قرار میگیرد.
(حملهٔ افسرده به خود، در حقیقت حمله به دیگری است؛ اما از طریقِ خود.)
@clinichamnava
به نظر میرسد خودسرزنشگری تلاشی برای متوقف کردنِ آن چیزی است که نمیخواهیم باشیم یا انجام دهیم؛
اما اغلب، همان چیزی را که با آن میجنگد، زنده نگه میدارد.
(خودسرزنشگری، نه به توقف، که اتفاقا به تکرار ختم میشود)
@@clinichamnava
دانستن، آگاه شدن باعث تغییر نمیشود می دانم ولی باز همان مسیر را میروم..
مثلا شما آدم ها رو با گفته هایشان میسنجید ولی آنچه از گفتن ش عاجزند در واقع خودواقعی شان است جایگاه روان، بدن ماست نه مغز ما
@clinichamnava
میتوان پر از «احساس گناه» بود،
اما خالی از «مسئولیت».
سوپرایگو، این وجهِ خودسرزنشگر، میتواند ما را بابت هر میل، هر اشتباه و هر ناکامی به محاکمه بکشاند؛ آنقدر که احساس کنیم منشأ همه چیزهای بد زندگی خود هستیم،
اما همین احساس گناه، الزاماً راهی به سوی مسئولیت باز نمیکند.
سوپرایگو میتواند سالها ما را به خاطر کوچکترین شکست سرزنش کند، بیآنکه فضایی برای ترمیم، جبران یا تغییر ایجاد کند.
حتی میتواند ما را مرکز تم…
قاطر به شتر حسودی میکنه
اما چون نمیتونه حسادت رو در آگاهی تجربه کنه، اون رو انکار میکنه
و شروع میکنه به انتقاد کردن از شتر!
و بدیهای خودش رو در شتر میبینه
و تازه احساس میکنه این شتر
هست که حسوده!!!!!
@clinichamnava
📌عشق، سفری است برای "دیدن دیگری"
مشکل بسیاری از شکستهای عاطفی این است که؛ ما در واقع با "تصویر ذهنی" خودمان از طرف مقابل رابطه داریم، نه با خودِ واقعی او! بلوغ در رابطه عاشقانه یعنی؛ پذیرش این واقعیت که معشوق ما، انسانی است با اراده، تفاوتها و محدودیتهای خاص خودش که تحت کنترل کامل ما نیست.
جوهر یک رابطه عاشقانه سالم، "بازشناسی" است، یعنی؛ هر دو طرف باید یکدیگر را به عنوان یک انسان مستقل با دنیای درونی خاص خود بب…
کودکانی که در کنار والدین نارسیستیک (خودشیفته) رشد میکنند،
به این باور میرسند که همهٔ افراد تا حدی نارسیستیک (خودشیفته) هستند.
به همین دلیل، روابط خود را حول محور دیگران جهتدهی میکنند.
@clinichamnava
شاید بزرگسالی یعنی
همه چیز رو به خودم نسبت ندم!
ما دیگه اون کودکی نیستیم که طبیعی بود اگر
فکر میکرد، دنیا فقط دورِخودش میچرخه.
ما نمیتونیم دیگران رو از رنج نجات بدیم،
نمیتونیم جلوی همه ناکامیهای خودمون یا
بقیه رو بگیریم،
و قرار نیست همهچیز دان یا همهتوان باشیم.
وارد دنیای بزرگسالی شدن آسون نیست،
برای همینه بعضیا تا همیشه کودک میمونن.
شاید بزرگسالی یعنی داشتن مرز در رابطه،
تاب آوردن ناکامی،
و پذیرفتنِ این …
👍1
Signed Sara Tr
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @clinichamnava. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“کلینیک روانشناختی همنوا” (@clinichamnava), 102 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/clinichamnava.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.