Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ЭХО КЛИЧ

@clichp2p

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

66subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003864293622
TypeChannel
Username@clichp2p
DescriptionПервый сервис, который ставит человека, а не алгоритм ответственным за знакомства. Сохраняя безопасность и глубину знакомств в офлайне.
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 14 February 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/clichp2p

Growth

6610 Aug 2026, 13:46 — 66 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 14:00 — 66 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 13:4610 Aug 2026, 14:00
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 65–67 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 14:0066no change
10 Aug 2026, 13:4666first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 14 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
134.1%
avg views ÷ 66 subscribers
Avg views / post
88.5
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.52%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 6 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held20 (14 February 202610 August 2026)
Views total531
Reactions total20
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 14:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
3
Videos
1
Links
3

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
35s
Average length
35s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

72 reactions across 14 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3345.8%
🔥1115.3%
❤‍🔥811.1%
🥰79.72%
👍68.33%
💯22.78%
👏11.39%
👾11.39%
💋11.39%
🙏11.39%
🫡11.39%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 72reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 February 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 11:28 UTC19 viewsread 10 August 2026

Привет! Это снова КЛИЧпросвет. На прошедшей неделе важнейшим событием стали ВЫ, дорогие новые подписанты 😉. Сууупер приятно, что вас заинтересовал проект 🦁 Пишите в комментариях, чтобы я прислал вам ссылку, либо делитесь своей, если уже внутри и хотите расширить свой круг. За прошедшую неделю я посвятил время шуткам о безопасности. Поэтому они вам не видны, но я стал спать чуть спокойнее, зная, что ваши данные под

8 Aug 2026, 13:18 UTCviews —

ЭХО КЛИЧ pinned «Если коротко: КЛИЧ — это способ находить своих через своих. Хочешь сходить на выставку, но не с кем? Кидаешь клич. Ищешь компанию на падел? Кидаешь клич. Нужен дизайнер в проект? Ну, вы поняли. Только вместо того, чтобы искать людей среди всего интернета…»

8 Aug 2026, 13:18 UTC61 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Если коротко: КЛИЧ — это способ находить своих через своих. Хочешь сходить на выставку, но не с кем? Кидаешь клич. Ищешь компанию на падел? Кидаешь клич. Нужен дизайнер в проект? Ну, вы поняли. Только вместо того, чтобы искать людей среди всего интернета, ты зовешь своих. А если среди своих никого не нашлось — клич идет дальше, к друзьям друзей. В этом, собственно, вся идея. Как пользоваться КЛИЧем? Заходишь, со

3🔥3💋1

5 Aug 2026, 11:07 UTC93 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Привет! Это запоздалый уженедельный КЛИЧпросвет о том, что сделано и как круто теперь этим пользоваться. 💬Важнейшая штука💬 От КЛИЧа теперь легко отказаться и выбрать причину отказа. Если не нравится тема, она попадёт в «не интересно», и вы больше не будете видеть такие темы. Или вообще можно отказаться получать кличи от конкретного человека. ✨ Оптимизировал интерфейс внутреннего диалога КЛИЧа. Теперь, когда вы ввод

5

26 Jul 2026, 20:17 UTC168 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Привет! Это еженедельный КЛИЧпросвет О том, что сделано и как круто теперь этим пользоваться 🍴 Пересобрал мобильную версию: экраны, навигацию и пустые состояния. Теперь КЛИЧ можно добавить на экран телефона и открывать одним нажатием. 👍 Навёл порядок в «Активности»: непрочитанное стало заметнее, активные кличи можно сворачивать, а завершённые — находить в архиве. При создании теперь выбираешь круг: — малый — бли

2

20 Jul 2026, 16:21 UTC120 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Ох, ребята! Приятно поделиться с вами тем, что внутренние работы по безопасности и улучшению почти подошли к концу. Это нужно было сделать, чтобы ваши данные не утекли незаметно. Почти допилены кличи, как по интересам, так и романтические. Воооот Короче, разработка — дело не дешёвое и не быстрое)) Хотя я всё собираю через нейронки, но функциональные решения, моменты психологии и путь пользователя всё равно проход

5🫡1

28 May 2026, 16:38 UTC138 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Ребята! 2 месяца мы молчали, но все это время мы вынашивали планы, строили гипотезы. Совсем скоро мы позовем вас тестировать КЛИЧ 2.0 Понятней, шире и веселее🐯

5🔥3

20 Mar 2026, 07:56 UTC157 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

УВЕДОМЛЕНИЯ ПОД КОНТРОЛЕМ Пока мы пересобираем приложение, решили добавить возможность отключить уведомления в боте. Для этого нужно перейти в «Анкету».

1

15 Mar 2026, 13:04 UTC129 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026

МЫ ЗАКРЫЛИ КЛИЧ Но только на время 😁 После вашей обратной связи мы поняли, что проекту нужна полная пересборка. — В первую очередь мы заново придумали механику поиска и знакомств. — Сразу добавим поиск по интересам. Во вторник снова откроем доступ к приложению. Пока — без изменений, но обо всех обновлениях сразу напишем здесь. Спасибо, что поучаствовали в тесте и были с нами честны. Это уже помогает сделать КЛИЧ

❤‍🔥5

25 Feb 2026, 09:07 UTCviews —

ЭХО КЛИЧ pinned «АНКЕТА АНКЕТА АНКЕТА АНКЕТА АНКЕТА АНКЕТА АНКЕТА АНКЕТА АНКЕТА АНКЕТА АНКЕТА АНКЕТА АНКЕТА АНКЕТА АНКЕТА АНКЕТА Друзья! Спасибо что участвовали в тесте КЛИЧ, теперь мы хотим услышать про ваши впечатления. Пройдите пожалуйста небольшую анкету, 2-3 минутки.…»

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @clichp2p. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

15 Feb 2026, 13:19 UTCAnonymous Poll21 voters

Для знакомства, вы бы что выбрали в первую очередь?

  1. Сервисы знакомств с анкетами?10%
  2. На улице/ супермаркете/ ну вы поняли10%
  3. В компании друзей71%
  4. Живу отшельником, из людей готов видеть только курьеров10%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 February 2026 to 10 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 479,415 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ЭХО КЛИЧ” (@clichp2p), 66 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/clichp2p.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.