Шоу-подкаст «Чистый хвост» выходит с 2020 года. Ведущие: шеф-редактор Спортса Павел Копачев, Полина Крутихина, Анастасия Жаворонкова, Майя Багрянцева и Иван Кузнецов
Платный канал для своих: https://paywall.pw/w7xvmzvneao4
Сотрудничество: @kopachev
Created
Between 1 March 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net +59. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,706–7,783 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 07:53
7,774
+19
9 Aug 2026, 15:21
7,755
+38
6 Aug 2026, 19:41
7,717
+2
6 Aug 2026, 10:46
7,715
first reading
Engagement
24 posts held, back to 10 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
98.6%
avg views ÷ 7,774 subscribers
Avg views / post
7,660
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.11%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 24 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held
24 (10 June 2026 – 11 August 2026)
Views total
99,610
Reactions total
4,094
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 17:08 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
460
Videos
25
Links
280
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
8,317 reactions across 24 posts, in 39 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
4,668
56.1%
🔥
694
8.34%
😱
545
6.55%
😭
443
5.33%
💔
376
4.52%
👍
338
4.06%
🍾
209
2.51%
😢
149
1.79%
😁
140
1.68%
🎉
104
1.25%
💯
73
0.878%
👎
70
0.842%
🙏
59
0.709%
🤯
59
0.709%
🥰
47
0.565%
❤🔥
39
0.469%
🤩
39
0.469%
🕊
32
0.385%
💅
30
0.361%
🙈
27
0.325%
19 further kinds
176
2.12%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,317reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 10 June 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
12
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 24 we hold a reading for · 29%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @cleantail. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 24 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 June 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Евгения Медведева – о своих чувствах после проката на Олимпиаде:
«Облегчение! Облегчение, что это все закончилось. Мы же все живые люди и сколько угодно можно нагонять романтики, что «я шла к этому всю жизнь, меня переполняло счастье». Это просто обертка. Но если говорить честно, то это – титанический труд. Олимпиада – это настолько стрессовое мероприятие, что, когда ты к нему готовишься, ты ждешь, когда оно закончи…
Яна Рудковская – о том, почему Лена Костылева не поедет на юниорский этап Гран-при в Китае (РИА Новости):
«Лена провела потрясающий кэмп в Баку. Потом неделю готовилась в Горках к прокатам. Она быстро начала набирать форму. Но так как Лена максимально хотела приблизиться к пику формы, то тренировала и накатывала очень много ультра-си для того, чтобы они были в программах, а не только сольно.
К сожалению, Лена не пр…
Мама Ира – с новостями о медицинских показаниях Елены Костылевой, которые не позволят ей выступить на юниорском этапе Гран-при в Китае (оригинал текста из ВК на скрине):
«Во избежание всяких домыслов, которые начала сегодня читать😥, хочу сообщить, не дожидаясь официальных сообщений от тренерского штаба.
Лена последний месяц много падала и ударялась с четверных прыжков о лед. Восстанавливая их. Вы знаете, что падени…
20 июля: «Подготовка идет. Как назвал ее наш тренер Евгений Плющенко: «Опять будем делать невозможное». Лучше слов не подобрать.
По‑другому будет скучно жить. С нами всегда как на войне» (Ирина Костылева)
2 августа: «Первый наш старт – Гран-при в Китае с Костылевой. Завтра приступаем к подготовке, многое надо делать. Прошли контрольные прокаты, для нас они прошли неплохо. Мы поставили пять ультра-си – столько не де…
⚡️Вот это поворот: Елена Костылева мимо юниорского этапа Гран-при в Китае, вместо нее выступит София Дзепка
«В составе команды, которая отправится на первый этап в Китае, произошла замена. Елена Костылева не сможет принять участие в турнире по медицинским показаниям» (Федерация фигурного катания на коньках России)
Каких инсайдов ждать от мамы Иры?
Спортс выпустил текст с заголовком «Вот теперь Валиева и Трусова точно вернулись. С их Олимпиады прошло почти 5 лет». И такого заголовка мы действительно давно ждали!
https://www.sports.ru/figure-skating/blogs/3433533.html?utm_source=telegram&utm_medium=cleantail
P.S. Как сообщает Майя в личном телеграм-канале, Камила Валиева уже сегодня выступит в шоу кэмпа Бенуа Ришо, из зрителей - только фигуристы и их родители.
‼️ Трусова, Валиева, Бойкова и Козловский получили нейтральные статусы
Кроме них, все хорошо со статусами у Елизаветы Пасечник и Дарио Чиризано, Екатерины Чикмаревой и Матвея Янченкова, Марии Захаровой, Петра Гуменника, Влада Дикиджи, Анастасии Мухортовой и Дмитрия Евгеньева, Ирины Хаврониной и Девида Нарижного, Дины Хуснутдиновой, Анны Коломенской и Артема Фролова, Анны Щербаковой и Егора Гончарова и других.
Ждем …
🎧Чистый хвост #202: Почему Аделия Петросян ушла от Этери Тутберидзе? Наши версии
От Этери Тутберидзе снова ушла топовая ученица. В чем причина на этот раз – в разочаровании олимпийским сезоном, нехватке мотивации или здоровья? А может быть, Петросян просто избегает постоянных сравнений с Трусовой?
Обсудили, в чем причины главного расставания межсезонья, и попробовали представить Аделию у других тренеров. Мишин, Фед…
Уход Петросян от Тутберидзе – продолжение легендарного сериала «Никогда такого не было – и вот опять!»
Скорее было бы удивительно, если бы этим все не закончилось.
В этом смысле, ничего нового: из учениц Этери, участвовавших на Олимпиаде, от нее не ушла только Алина Загитова. Липницкая, Медведева, Щербакова, Трусова, Косторная, Валиева, и теперь – Петросян, проголосовали ногами в другом направлении (хотя кое-кто из…
‼️ Аделия Петросян покинула тренерский штаб Этери Тутберидзе
«Это решение далось мне непросто. Огромная благодарность Этери Георгиевне, Даниилу Марковичу [Глейхенгаузу] и Сергею Викторовичу [Дудакову] за пройденный вместе путь.
Спасибо за потрясающие программы, за все наши победы и колоссальный опыт, который я получила рядом с вами. Я бесконечно уважаю вас и ценю все, что было для меня сделано. Пусть у вас и ваших …
Очень много вопросов, сомнений и даже паники, как на нашем фондовом рынке.
Почему Трусова еще не получила нейтральный статус, а Федоров получил? Когда ждать допуск Валиевой?
Записали для вас небольшой, но важный спецвыпуск по теме допуска в нашем закрытом канале «Чистый хвост: версия для своих». Подписывайтесь, будем рады!
❤131👎15👍9😢6😁3
Signed Pavel Kopachev
Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @cleantail. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@cleantail edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
8 August 2026
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Допустят ли наших фигуристов до международных соревнований?
Конечно, уже пора!13%
Да, но только юниоров48%
Нет, опять что-нибудь придумают44%
The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 10 June 2026 to 11 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 449,580 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Шоу Чистый хвост – фигурное катание и не только” (@cleantail), 7,774 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cleantail.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
