Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 76% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
15 measurements spanning 52 days, net +644. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,618–8,456 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
27 Sept 2026, 10:40
8,359
+163
15 Sept 2026, 06:16
8,196
+29
11 Sept 2026, 13:58
8,167
+90
7 Sept 2026, 09:01
8,077
+113
2 Sept 2026, 21:26
7,964
+31
31 Aug 2026, 01:44
7,933
+27
28 Aug 2026, 01:03
7,906
+84
24 Aug 2026, 16:13
7,822
+31
21 Aug 2026, 05:43
7,791
+2
18 Aug 2026, 07:42
7,789
+7
15 Aug 2026, 18:06
7,782
+8
12 Aug 2026, 07:53
7,774
+19
9 Aug 2026, 15:21
7,755
+38
6 Aug 2026, 19:41
7,717
+2
6 Aug 2026, 10:46
7,715
first reading
Engagement
39 posts held, back to 10 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 39 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
15,109 reactions across 39 posts, in 44 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
8,559
56.6%
🔥
1,064
7.04%
😁
694
4.59%
❤🔥
658
4.36%
😱
546
3.61%
🍾
530
3.51%
👍
487
3.22%
😭
450
2.98%
💔
376
2.49%
🎉
252
1.67%
🤣
214
1.42%
😢
153
1.01%
🏆
128
0.847%
🙏
110
0.728%
👎
92
0.609%
🥰
89
0.589%
💅
80
0.529%
👏
75
0.496%
💯
73
0.483%
🤯
60
0.397%
24 further kinds
419
2.77%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 39 of the 39 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 15,109 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 39 most recent posts we hold, published 10 June 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
21
across the posts below
Posts paid on
11
of 39 we hold a reading for · 28%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @cleantail. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 39 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 June 2026 to 28 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
2.56%
1 of 39 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
5,800
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
7,850
over 38 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2W5zFJforkq
1
19 August 2026
19 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 39 most recent posts we hold, published 10 June 2026 to 28 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Давайте разберемся, что за юридическая вакханалия произошла с распределением мест на Гран-при.
1. Петросян и Гуменник, одиннадцатые в рейтинге лучших результатов прошлого сезона и первые среди тех, кто не получил ни одного этапа, должны были стать главными кандидатами на замену. И места уже начали освобождаться: Денис Васильевс, Алиса Лью и Лорин Шильд исчезли из списков.
2. Сегодня ISU уточнил правила отбора в сер…
‼️ Аделия Петросян – у Инны Гончаренко
Тезисно:
• Аделия сделала выбор и будет готовиться к сезону у Инны Гончаренко, самая известная ученица которой – Елена Радионова (чемпионка России, призер чемпионатов Европы и мира).
• Федерация подтвердила, сама фигуристка и тренер тоже.
• Короткая программа уже готова, ее поставила Анжелика Крылова. Произвольная «в процессе»
• Петросян планирует выйти на контрольные прока…
Сегодня день рождения у человека, который точно слушал все выпуски «Чистого хвоста»; поддержит дискуссию хоть про башни Шпильбанда, хоть про олимпийский командный турнир в Пхенчхане; и сделал возможным наш сумасшедший график выхода этой зимой.
Макс! Спасибо за бессонные ночи, вовремя выловленные «ух, потерял мысль, сейчас перепишу», и спасенные выпуски, в которых кто-то из нас не настроил микрофон! Спасибо за то, чт…
Ох, какая неожиданная новость:) Новый сезон пройдет без моей любимой Алисы Лью.
Конечно, я расстроен. Еще с февраля.
Но!
Она обязательно вернется. С новыми программами, которые пылятся еще с олимпийского сезона. С тройным акселем, который почти готов. С бесконечной поддержкой американской федерации и нежной любовью судей.
Чемпионка, которую мы видели с двумя постановками примерно полтора сезона. А то, что видели …
🎧Чистый хвост #203: Роскошное возвращение России по юниорам, спорные программы Трусовой и Гуменника
Российские юниоры мощно вернулись: 4 золота из 4 на Гран-при и восторженные комментарии иностранцев. Дело в слабом этапе, или ждем повтор триумфа на ЮЧМ?
Пока мама Ира разбирается в своих чувствах к тренеру дочери, София Дзепка становится всеобщей любимицей. Международный сезон для Костылевой уже закончен?
Новые про…
Роскошное возвращение: 4 победы из 4!
Наши фигуристы на юниорском этапе Гран-при в Китае взяли все золотые медали. Уверенно.
Только цифры: Фефелова и Валов оторвались от второго места почти на 8 баллов, Лазарев – почти на 20, Дзепка – почти на 24, Шешелева и Карнаухов – почти на 35.
Что было сегодня утром?
Лев Лазарев прыгнул в произвольной сразу 4 четверных. Из недочетов – на флипе судьи поставили неясное ребро,…
Международная премьера нашей женской одиночки удалась!
София Дзепка не просто забрала золото, но презентовала себя двумя совершенно разноплановыми программами.
Классическая балетная короткая и графическая, резкая произвольная под «Матрицу», собранная на контрасте не только хореографически, но по костюму. Комбинезон Тринити Софии очень к лицу! Четверной тулуп тоже получился, так что зашли сразу со всех козырей.
Осо…
Есть первое золото на международке!
Мария Фефелова и Артём Валов - лучшие в танцах на льду на юниорском этапе Гран-при в Китае. Отрыв от второго места - почти 8 баллов.
Достойная международная премьера произвольного танца от Бенуа Ришо. Смотрелось по-взрослому, без скидок на возраст.
Утро тоже началось приятно: после короткой программы мальчиков Лев Лазарев ожидаемо первый. Баллы отличные (86,76), откатал чисто, н…
Полина Шешелева и Егор Карнаухов — тоже первые!
Первый день первого юниорского Гран-при для наших ребят: три первых места в трёх видах. Отрыв Полины с Егором от китайского дуэта - больше 11 баллов. И это с не засчитанным тодесом - в протоколе за него нули.
На шестиминутной разминке произошло очень неприятное столкновение между Полиной и американкой Байлен Тайч. Выглядело опасно, но, кажется, на прокате это не сказа…
София Дзепка уверенно лидирует на китайском Гран-при среди юниоров, исполнив 2A, 3Lz, 3F+3T.
Будут ли ультра-си в произвольной?
1. София Дзепка (Россия) – 72,74
2. Карин Миязаки (Япония) – 67,21
3. Юйсюань Лю (Китай) – 66,72
4. Каоруко Вада (Япония) – 66,10
5. Чонгел Хван (Корея) – 62,49
Полные результаты
❤244🔥68🥰26💘4
Signed Pavel Kopachev
Showing the 12 most recent of 39 posts we hold for @cleantail. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@cleantail edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
8 August 2026
Polls
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Допустят ли наших фигуристов до международных соревнований?
Конечно, уже пора!13%
Да, но только юниоров48%
Нет, опять что-нибудь придумают44%
The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 39 most recent posts we hold, published 10 June 2026 to 28 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Шоу Чистый хвост – фигурное катание и не только” (@cleantail), 8,359 subscribers as measured 27 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cleantail.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.