every few months…i reopen spam…slightly selective will accept if we’ve interacted a little before! mostly about interests or every day life or telecomm LOL https://t.me/+zlqI-qjEtUJkOGI1

Channel
claude's apothecary
@claudeapothecary
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
119subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002781278292 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @claudeapothecary |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/claudeapothecary |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 02:24 | 119 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 04:02 | 120 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 00:02 | 120 | first reading |
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 8 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 87.4%
- avg views ÷ 119 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 104
- 4 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 2.11%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 4
- of 18 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 4 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (8 June 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 416 |
| Reactions total | 6 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 04:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
12 reactions across 5 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 91.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 11 | 91.7% | |
| 💘 | 1 | 8.33% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 8 June 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
have just sent out all address checks for mailing! please lmk if you didn't receive one
happy salt air season (august) soon!! some updates: - my house is still contagious zone so mailing is still halted (have barely seen my family in 2 weeks) as it’s infectious by contact so i’m refraining from packing/mailing anything just in case - MMU should be on 22nd august unless any last minute changes! next mmu will be in sept due to family + medical + work reasons on all other weekends🙂↕️🙂↕️ mmu post to be p…
❤2
hello all! immediate effect all mail and self collect will be halted until further notice as my sibling has just been diagnosed with HFMD🧎🏻 i’ve not had any HFMD symptoms so far + haven’t seen them much this week, and all items have not come in contact with them, but to play it safe i will be halting until they are cleared🙇 thank you for noting!!
❤3💘1
thank you all for today!! next will be in aug but will see how as i have potentially several medical follow ups🙇🙇
❤1
🎁 18th jul mmu 🎁 location: suntec (exact will be posted again!) time: 2:30pm to 3:30pm art credits: am_maple27 on vgen! note: will be with oomf(s) please only collect your items from me! will update what i’m wearing that day. please show me your PAYMENT message that you receive from me! list: - mint garden @yunaxils @tabithacmy @yueoii (@OoO_0o0_0o0 htc) @renjeolmi yon + rye comment below if interested thank youu…
hello! will have MMU this week, sorry there's no fixed self collect currently due to medical reasons :" MMU will def proceed though unless i need to be hospitalised or anything LOL will post up MMU post tmr after my medical check~
self collect for this week [sorry for delay work emergencies!] - 10th july [friday]: sengkang MRT at 5:45pm so sorry no orchard mrt this week as i have work commitments! please dm @nyyxi if collecting~
sorry for no meetup schedule this week! i’ve been really sick 🧎🏻🧎🏻 will post up schedule for next week during the weekend~
thank you all for todayyyy! get home safe 🙂
❤4
🌜 27th jun MMU 🌜 art credits: shu yamino 🤍 location: exact tbc (will post on day) time: 2:30pm to 3:30pm no show fees will apply! 🐳= noted 🐳= packed list: - mint garden yuna tabitha @nagitok @tsjfx @hanbunko @mxngz @sayaka9731 @imatinyrat @taretenipuri @clymzy69 @shiaririn @wwwhhattttt @krunaes NOTE: will be with other people, do not ask them or approach them for collection especially if i’m not there🙇 please sho…
#instocks #nijijp koya 2nd anniv voice standee bnip…have been trying to find a place but whelp price: $10…………..? comment below if interested~
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @claudeapothecary. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,323,158 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“claude's apothecary” (@claudeapothecary), 119 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/claudeapothecary.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.