Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

My blood

@clancy00001

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

248subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002809353183
TypeChannel
Username@clancy00001
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/clancy00001

Growth

24812 Aug 2026, 02:31 — 248 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 20:13 — 248 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 02:3112 Aug 2026, 20:13
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 247–249 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 20:13248no change
12 Aug 2026, 02:31248first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 23 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
82.2%
avg views ÷ 248 subscribers
Avg views / post
204
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
23.1%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 13 of 14 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held15 (23 July 202610 August 2026)
Views total2,854
Reactions total644
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 02:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

644 reactions across 13 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 547203866297790995716525.6%
custom 608686309396132974014622.7%
custom 523135871157378504114021.7%
custom 51904037760448887106610.2%
custom 5230992565611815501619.47%
custom 5247241552174008041345.28%
custom 5231170463157202667304.66%
custom 533952737702422622520.311%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 644reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 22:50 UTC81 views50 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Я рисовала это еще в июне пальчиком на телефоне! Можно сказать, это последняя работа до того как я пересела на другую технику ❤️ Но все равно очень люблю эту картинку, ибо на тот момент потратила очень много сил и времени. #TØP #рисунок

custom 608686309396132974026custom 547203866297790995712custom 52313587115737850419custom 51904037760448887101custom 52309925656118155011custom 53395273770242262251

10 Aug 2026, 22:48 UTC61 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @gspdsbkkPhoto

🔫🔫🔫🔫🔫🔫 🔫🔫🔫🔫🔫🔫 🔫🔫My blood 🔫🔫жмурка |-/ 🔫🔫lunafawn 🔫🔫маркоф 🔫🔫лает, но не кусает 🔫🔫rest!¡ yo яблоко убрали из выборов, но внизу можно хотя бы за понравившуюся работу проголосовать👇

custom 523135871157378504111

10 Aug 2026, 06:39 UTC101 views43 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Пж, не отписывайтесь🙏 у меня готовится парочку картинок Я просто последнюю неделю работу доделываю перед отпуском, стараюсь навести порядки 🤯 Пока буду в поездке, покажу вам все-все что у меня лежит

custom 523135871157378504123custom 608686309396132974014custom 52309925656118155015custom 51904037760448887101

4 Aug 2026, 22:59 UTC169 views28 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @cchervviiPhoto

woof..!! >_< в комментах оставлю ссылку на пост, кем вдохновилась буду так же рада репостам, реактам и комментам :3

custom 523099256561181550117custom 54720386629779099576custom 52313587115737850414custom 60868630939613297401

4 Aug 2026, 07:13 UTC125 views32 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @gokuspamPhoto

My name's Blurryface and I care what you think...

custom 523135871157378504120custom 519040377604488871012

4 Aug 2026, 05:48 UTC171 views62 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Может вы хотите мальчиков в юбках?😊

custom 547203866297790995728custom 519040377604488871016custom 608686309396132974015custom 52313587115737850412custom 52472415521740080411

3 Aug 2026, 06:32 UTC162 views55 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Тайлер Джозеф из моей аушки🦌

custom 523117046315720266727custom 523135871157378504116custom 51904037760448887109custom 52472415521740080412custom 60868630939613297401

1 Aug 2026, 15:24 UTC174 views42 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Решила почиркать Мелани. Я очень влюбилась в платье, у которого открывалась груднач клетка😊 Надеюсь закончу🌟

custom 547203866297790995720custom 524724155217400804112custom 52313587115737850416custom 51904037760448887103custom 60868630939613297401

29 Jul 2026, 03:15 UTC258 views25 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Прошу у вас активчика на вчерашней картинке Спасибо😊

custom 547203866297790995718custom 51904037760448887107

28 Jul 2026, 13:49 UTC705 views122 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

I wanted you to show me ........The way around the city walls .................The way on through 😊😊😊 🤩 😊😊😊 😊😊😊 😊😊😊 #TØP 🤩 #рисунок 😊😊😊😊😊 😊😊😊😊 Репосты, реакции и комментарии очень бы хотелось услышать, спасибо!🤩

custom 547203866297790995747custom 608686309396132974036custom 523135871157378504127custom 52472415521740080414custom 51904037760448887103custom 52309925656118155012custom 52311704631572026672custom 53395273770242262251

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @clancy00001. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,077,728 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“My blood” (@clancy00001), 248 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/clancy00001.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.