Сайты «Сбера» , ВТБ, Россельхозбанка, Т-банка, «Уралсиба», Промсвязьбанка и банка «Санкт-Петербург» перешли на небезопасный российский сертификат шифрования TLS, обнаружила «Медиазона». На прошлой неделе на этот же сертификат, выдаваемый Минцифры, перешел сайт «Альфа-банка». Российские власти могут расшифровывать трафик любых сайтов, если на устройстве установлен сертификат Минцифры. "Да, им нужно будет его сначала …

Channel
Civil Defence Node
@civil_defence_node
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
64subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002856825725 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @civil_defence_node |
| Description | Для связи @civil_defence_bot Если вас преследует путинское гестапо за ваше мнение, или вы чувствуете себя в зоне риска политических преследований, вы можете проконсультироваться здесь. |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/civil_defence_node |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 02:47 | 64 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:17 | 64 | first reading |
Engagement
9 posts held, back to 9 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 151.1%
- avg views ÷ 64 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 96.7
- 7 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 3.47%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 7
- of 9 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 7 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 9 (9 July 2026 – 3 August 2026) |
| Views total | 677 |
| Reactions total | 15 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 02:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 130
- Videos
- 36
- Links
- 63
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 45m 24s
- Average length
- 15m 08s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
22 reactions across 7 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😢 | 11 | 50.0% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 18.2% | |
| ❤ | 2 | 9.09% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 9.09% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 4.55% | |
| 🤬 | 1 | 4.55% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 4.55% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 22reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Неизвестный в Воронеже в ночь с 27 на 28 июля осквернил мурал с изображением военнослужащих на площади Ленина😱, нанеся на него краской несколько надписей, "в том числе аббревиатуры организаций, запрещенных на территории России", пишет блокнот-Воронеж. "В прокуратуре отметили, что решение о возбуждении уголовного дела было принято незамедлительно по требованию прокурора Воронежской области Сергея Филипенко. Помимо эт…
👏2
Политзаключенный Григорий Северин сейчас находится в ИК-1 строгого режима, в г. Семилуки под Воронежем и сразу помещен в ШИЗО, откуда по информации от него по всей видимости не выйдет до конца срока. В Воронежских колониях распространена практика незаконной изоляции политзаключенных в ШИЗО от основной массы заключенных по надуманным предлогам. Ранее Григорий Северин провел весь свой срок по предыдущему уголовному де…
😢3
В октябре 2023 воронежец Виктор Ичев якобы установил отношения конфиденциального сотрудничества с представителями спецслужб иностранного государства и осуществлял сбор и передавал сведения о российских военнослужащих, а также об использовании технологий беспроводной связи в различных организациях" , воронежский областной суд вынес приговор 14 лет лишения свободы по ст. 275 ук рф о госизмене, сообщила прокуратура Вор…
Взгляд с точки зрения доверия к институтам. Искусственный интеллект и грядущие перемены. Мир в котором мы хотим жить. За что "российские патриоты" обожают Трампа. Разрушение доверия к институтам как оружие. Задачи путинской агентуры вне России - разрушение демократических институтов Запада. За что удалил Василия Крюкова из админов. Имитация выборов в путинской России, партия "подставные люди", не избиратели а уже раб…
👍2
Григорий Северин отправлен по этапу в колонию строгого режима по обвинению в т.н. "повторной дискредитации армии". По этой причине 16 июля Федор Орлов не смог передать ему передачку, которую ранее пытался передать 7 июля. СИЗО-1 Воронежа говорят самое худшее СИЗО в России из-за очередей на передачки. На видео Федор Орлов рассказывает об аде в СИЗО-1. Эта передача продуктов была передана Юрию Авсеневу, Владимиру Гром…
😢6
Студента Борисоглебского дорожного техникума Дениса Коваленко, который проходил сборы на военном аэродроме, приговорили к 17 годам колонии по делу о сотрудничестве с СБУ и призывах к экстремизму. По версии следствия, Коваленко летом 2024 года связался с представителем Службы безопасности Украины и договорился о сотрудничестве, которое продлилось вплоть до его задержания 17 июля 2025. В мае 2025 Коваленко проходил уч…
😢2
Очередь на заправку в 3 часа ночи в Воронеже.
👍2🤬1🤯1😁1
Сегодня у воронежского оппозиционера Павла Сычева прошел обыск. Его арестовали на сутки по статье о якобы возбуждении ненависти и вражды (20.3.1 КоАП), сообщает канал "неполитика". Без сомнения сегодняшний прессинг связан с его постом о новом начальнике главка МВД Воронежа Максиме Петрушине, который начал службу с того, что заявил, что уличные музыканты в Воронеже должны согласовывать свои выступления с властью, пос…
❤2
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @civil_defence_node. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 521,140 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Civil Defence Node” (@civil_defence_node), 64 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/civil_defence_node.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.