Video message, posted without a caption
custom 533485155779822435222🥰14🔥9custom 53642014358587448696

Channel
@citterbassas
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
872subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001985263759 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @citterbassas |
| Description | 𝑍ℎ𝑖𝑧𝑛ь - 𝑒𝑡𝑜 𝑧𝑎𝑑𝑎𝑐ℎ𝑎, 𝑘𝑜𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑢𝑦𝑢 𝑛𝑖𝑘𝑡𝑜 𝑛𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑠ℎ𝑖𝑙 𝑏𝑒𝑧 𝑜𝑠ℎ𝑖𝑏𝑜𝑘❤️🩹 𝑀𝑜𝑦𝑎 𝑙𝑖𝑐ℎ𝑘𝑎 @citterb |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/citterbassas |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:16 | 872 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:02 | 872 | first reading |
6 posts held, back to 1 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
291 reactions across 6 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 107 | 36.8% | |
| custom 5334851557798224352 | 72 | 24.7% | |
| custom 5364201435858744869 | 64 | 22.0% | |
| 🔥 | 32 | 11.0% | |
| 🥰 | 14 | 4.81% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 0.687% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 291reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 1 April 2026 to 4 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 533485155779822435222🥰14🔥9custom 53642014358587448696
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 533485155779822435231🔥16❤12custom 53642014358587448693
Всех поздравляю с началом лета!🫶 Что-то я пропала на два месяца( Постараюсь это исправить😇 Всем хороших каникул и жарких летних деньков❤️
custom 536420143585874486933❤18🔥7
Вчера!!!💗
❤39custom 533485155779822435219custom 536420143585874486913
Приветик, а в какой онлайн-школе учишься? Добрый день, интернет урок приветик, у тебя были какие то травмы? и можешь ли ты дать какой то совет… я месяц назад вывихнула колено, и сейчас предстоит долгое восстановление, я переживаю как то поэтому поводу, что забуду все прыжки, будет страх перед ними, и тд(( не знаю, что делать даже Добрый день. Да, у меня были травмы, больше всего страдала моя правая стопа. Прыжки ты …
❤15custom 53642014358587448696
Приветик! Хотелось спросить: нравится тебе работа тренером? И как тебе работать с учениками?:) привет, да, мне нравится работать тренером. сначала было тяжко работать, т.к. я не понимала, что мне делать. со временем привыкла и сейчас мне не так сложно работать, как раньше настяяя веди пожалуйста больше свой тг, очень интересно вообще смотреть про тебя, твою жизнь, тренерство ?)😜 хорошо, я постараюсь) Где тренируешь…
❤23custom 53642014358587448693👏2
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @citterbassas. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,412,411 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Marasanchik👹” (@citterbassas), 872 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/citterbassas.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.