Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for CITADAIL HEDGE FUND DAO

Channel

CITADAIL HEDGE FUND DAO

@citadailhf

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

657subscribers

-8 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002250686990
TypeChannel
Username@citadailhf
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 10 February 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live22 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 22 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/citadailhf

Growth

6576656617 August 2026 — 665 subscribers8 August 2026 — 665 subscribers16 August 2026 — 661 subscribers22 August 2026 — 657 subscribers7 August 202622 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 15 days, net -8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 656–666 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
22 Aug 2026, 21:34657-4
16 Aug 2026, 03:54661-4
8 Aug 2026, 02:34665no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:53665first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 10 February 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 April 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 21s
Average length
1m 21s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

511 reactions across 18 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥27052.8%
13626.6%
👍377.24%
254.89%
🤝193.72%
👏122.35%
🤡50.978%
❤‍🔥40.783%
💩10.196%
🤣10.196%
🥰10.196%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 511reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 February 2025 to 21 April 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

21 Apr 2025, 21:12 UTC≈1,540 views37 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://x.com/citadailhedge/status/1914426892410671202?s=46

18🔥13🤡5💩1

20 Apr 2025, 17:22 UTC≈2,240 views24 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

https://x.com/citadailhedge/status/1914006480132383021?s=46

18👏42

19 Mar 2025, 14:42 UTC≈1,590 views26 reactionsread 8 August 2026

SCHEDULE A POST ON X FOR 11:23 EST ITS OFF THE CHART!!

👍20🔥6

17 Mar 2025, 17:14 UTC≈1,350 views38 reactionsread 8 August 2026

The OTC App is NOW LIVE!! Its still being tested and please do not use it to make very large trades until we confirm everything is 100% functioning and secure. It will be hosted on our domain shortly. https://solana-escrow-eight.vercel.app/escrow

23🔥131👍1

13 Mar 2025, 14:08 UTC≈1,580 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Here is a How To video from DePass. You dont need to connect a discord or X. The wallet you connect does need to have 1 COTC Card in it. Once you verify with the bot you can get access to the chat via the link. The link will not work until you verify! @depassxyz_bot https://t.me/+M22376nkgPFlMWQx

10

12 Mar 2025, 14:56 UTC≈1,150 views35 reactionsread 8 August 2026

We are going to make the investment into DareMarket. We will receive the token that will be native to the platform once they launch. All Tx will be posted in here and I am happy everyone wanted to go along with it. The names the dev has backing it are going to put this on the level of Polymarket

🔥31❤‍🔥4

6 Mar 2025, 20:26 UTC≈1,300 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Poll

The number of tokens graduating to Raydium from pump.fun has declined to less than 1%. Now that the market is beginning to reverse, do we have Agent Cordele:

  1. Trade tokens for the DAO (no sniping)59%
  2. Trade tokens and Snipe Pump.fun launches for the DAO41%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

👍9

6 Mar 2025, 17:39 UTC≈1,190 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Our OTC application is ready as of today WITHOUT the NFT discount feature. We can release today and then release V2 with that when it is. Or wait and release it all at once.

  1. Release today without NFT discount63%
  2. Wait for NFT discount to be added37%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

2 Mar 2025, 23:59 UTC≈1,200 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026

dare.market is a defi betting and social platform that allows you to compete in dares on-chain to win bounties. Think of it as the first social betting marketplace where people put money on the line to challenge friends, influencers, or the entire internet.

16

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @citadailhf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

6 Mar 2025, 20:26 UTCFinal Results104 voters

The number of tokens graduating to Raydium from pump.fun has declined to less than 1%. Now that the market is beginning to reverse, do we have Agent Cordele:

  1. Trade tokens for the DAO (no sniping)59%
  2. Trade tokens and Snipe Pump.fun launches for the DAO41%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

6 Mar 2025, 17:39 UTCFinal Results105 voters

Our OTC application is ready as of today WITHOUT the NFT discount feature. We can release today and then release V2 with that when it is. Or wait and release it all at once.

  1. Release today without NFT discount63%
  2. Wait for NFT discount to be added37%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

2 Mar 2025, 21:37 UTCFinal Results196 voters

Citadail has the opportunity to invest in a DeFi market, somewhat like Polymarket. It’s first of its kind but is based on real life events. The ROI is expected to be very high. Should we invest?

  1. Yes90%
  2. No10%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 February 2025 to 21 April 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 720,638 of 1,620,105entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“CITADAIL HEDGE FUND DAO” (@citadailhf), 657 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/citadailhf.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.