31 Jul 2026, 20:31 UTC117 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo
Можно даже так:
Channel
citation à l'ordre du jour
@citacions
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
180subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002723738884 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @citacions |
| Description | неевклидова психология Запись на сеансы @deconstructurise |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/citacions |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 13:01 | 180 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:48 | 180 | first reading |
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 24 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 64.7%
- avg views ÷ 180 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 117
- 2 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 2
- of 17 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 17 (24 April 2026 – 31 July 2026) |
| Views total | 233 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 13:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 17
- Links
- 12
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
31 Jul 2026, 20:27 UTC116 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo
Photo, posted without a caption
30 Jun 2026, 14:54 UTC348 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo
И да, наконец-то кто-то это сделал)
30 Jun 2026, 13:46 UTC≈1,050 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo
Ищу бывших или действующих политически ангажированных скинхедов для короткого интервью по теме, находящейся на стыке теории игр, философии и психоанализа. Фа или антифа, значения не имеет, поскольку вопрос касается исключительно логики принятия решения в конкретной гипотетической ситуации. Респондент может отвечать анонимно и не сообщать никакой личной информации. Если вы знаете кого-то, кто подходит под это описан…
16 Jun 2026, 13:00 UTC407 viewsread 8 August 2026
Другой пример - позитивистский перевод Фрейд: Entwurf einer Psychologie Американцы: Project for a Scientific Psychology За ними израильтяне: מתווה לפסיכולוגיה מדעית Французы (Esquisse d'une psychologie) и русские (хотя в народе встречаются «научная» и почему-то «одна») в официальных изданиях тлетворной научности избежали.
16 Jun 2026, 11:50 UTC368 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo
Хорошая иллюстрация колониального перевода: легким движением руки тема несвободы арабского мира сужается до вопроса о том, почему арабы такие несвободные.
14 Jun 2026, 12:19 UTC294 viewsread 8 August 2026
Есть мнение, по-видимому, разделяемое большинством аналитиков, что у Фрейда не было идеологии. Допущение подобного исключения вызывает сомнения, поскольку бессознательное, свободное от идеологии, может выступить чем-то сродни мифическому чистому желанию анализировать — которое также, в соответствии с идеологией, артикулированной Финком, Фрейду принято приписывать. Наша способность подмечать отдельные составляющие жел…
13 Jun 2026, 21:31 UTC279 viewsread 8 August 2026
Обнаружила у Лакана пассаж, к которому идеально подходит знаменитый мем. On sait le « comment peut-on être psychanalyste » qui nous fait faire encore à l’occasion sur des lèvres mondaines figure de Persan, et que s’y enchaîne bientôt un « je n’aimerais pas vivre avec un psychanalyste », dont la chère pensive nous réconforte par l'aspect de ce que le sort nous épargne. [из Situation de la psychanalyse et formation …
6 Jun 2026, 08:00 UTC322 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo
Едва ли по способности связывать дискурсы можно судить о профессиональных качествах психоаналитика, но если вам вдруг хотелось сравнить уровень политической грамотности ЖАМа и никому не известного палестинского лаканиста по имени مصعب, то вот)
3 Jun 2026, 10:38 UTC337 viewsread 8 August 2026
Пока писала, влезла в этимологию. Оказалось, что скан- в «сканворде» — не от латинского scandere (роднящего скандирование со сканером), как я всегда думала, а от Скандинавии, где этот тип кроссворда появился. Идиотское слово.
3 Jun 2026, 10:06 UTC603 viewsread 8 August 2026
Даже производимые из совершенно разных, казалось бы, точек зрения высказывания о психоаналитическом сообществе сегодня свидетельствуют об одном и том же парализующем эффекте: не только критическая позиция, но и, что важнее, возможность анализировать производимую собственным сообществом речь фактически не признается. И если такой вывод из романтического представления о коллективе психоаналитиков как об исключении из т…
22 May 2026, 12:25 UTC346 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo
Если бы картинку на обложку мероприятия на таймпеде выбирала я, там бы, конечно, было вот это:
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @citacions. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 931,549 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“citation à l'ordre du jour” (@citacions), 180 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/citacions.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.