CIS LEBANON SECURITY INDEX - September 15 2026 https://cissecurity.net/security-index/september-15-2026/ #Lebanon #LebanonSecurityIndex #Security #SecurityIndex

Channel
CIS Security Lebanon
@cissecuritylb
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002306593750 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cissecuritylb |
| Description | Security Services since 1990 |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 16 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cissecuritylb |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 01:22 | 3 | no change |
| 14 Aug 2026, 07:30 | 3 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 28 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 411.7%
- avg views ÷ 3 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 12.3
- 20 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 20
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (28 August 2026 – 15 September 2026) |
| Views total | 247 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 16 Sept 2026, 01:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 41
- Links
- 49
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 16 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
CIS LEBANON SECURITY INDEX - September 14 2026 ⬆️ RISING — Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz said Sunday that Israeli forces will "eliminate" anyone who approaches the Ali al-Taher ridge, describing the army as preparing to take control of the area and to prevent Hezbollah or any… Read the full report #Lebanon #LebanonSecurityIndex #Security #SecurityIndex
CIS LEBANON SECURITY INDEX - September 12 2026 ↗️ WORSENING (DIPLOMATICALLY) — CIS nudges its Index score up today, not because of a new mass-casualty incident, but because the primary mechanism for de-escalating this conflict has just been pushed back by a full month. Read the full report #Lebanon #LebanonSecurityIndex #Security #SecurityIndex
CIS LEBANON SECURITY INDEX - September 11 2026 ↔️ MIXED — CIS holds its reading close to Thursday's level, but the character of today's top story is different from anything CIS has reported in this cycle. Read the full report #Lebanon #LebanonSecurityIndex #Security #SecurityIndex
CIS LEBANON SECURITY INDEX - September 10 2026 ⬇️ EASING — CIS lowers today's reading from Monday's 90/100 CRITICAL, reflecting a genuine and reported de-escalation: local and international mediation, credited by Lebanese broadcaster Al-Jadeed to contacts made by President Aoun,… Read the full report #Lebanon #LebanonSecurityIndex #Security #SecurityIndex
CIS LEBANON SECURITY INDEX - September 9 2026 ⬇️ EASING — Overnight into Wednesday, Israeli artillery shelled the southern towns of Kfar Remman, al-Mansouri, Wadi Zebqine, Mays al-Jabal and Qabrikha, while air and drone strikes hit Nabatieh al-Fawqa, Wadi Zebqine, Wadi Slouqi and… Read the full report #Lebanon #LebanonSecurityIndex #Security #SecurityIndex
CIS LEBANON SECURITY INDEX - September 8 2026 ⬇️ EASING FROM PEAK, STILL CRITICAL — Overnight into Tuesday, Hezbollah launched two explosive drones at Israeli troops on the Ali al-Taher ridge — the third such launch in a week — prompting further Israeli strikes on Kfar Rumman… Read the full report #Lebanon #LebanonSecurityIndex #Security #SecurityIndex
CIS LEBANON SECURITY INDEX - September 7 2026 ⬆️ RISING — Overnight into Monday, Israeli strikes on the town of Kfar Rumman (Kafr Rouman), in the Nabatieh district, destroyed a three-story residential building, killing nine people including two infants and wounding five; a separate… Read the full report #Lebanon #LebanonSecurityIndex #Security #SecurityIndex
CIS LEBANON SECURITY INDEX - September 6 2026 ⬆️ RISING — CIS is correcting its own scale application from the September 5 edition, where an index reading in the 61–80 HIGH band was mislabeled CRITICAL. Read the full report #Lebanon #LebanonSecurityIndex #Security #SecurityIndex
CIS LEBANON SECURITY INDEX - September 5 2026 ↔️ HOLDING AT SEVERE, WITH AN IMPORTANT CORRECTION TO YESTERDAY'S REPORT — CIS must directly qualify its September 4 update, in which it reported Netanyahu's and Katz's declarations that Ali al-Taher had been fully captured and "no longer… https://cissecurity.net/security-index/september-5-2026/ #Lebanon #LebanonSecurityIndex #Security #SecurityIndex
CIS LEBANON SECURITY INDEX - September 4 2026 ↔️ HOLDING AT SEVERE, WITH GENUINELY MIXED SIGNALS — CIS can confirm today that the prisoner exchange it reported yesterday has been completed in full. Read the full report #Lebanon #LebanonSecurityIndex #Security #SecurityIndex
CIS LEBANON SECURITY INDEX - September 3 2026 ⬆️ RISING ON THE MILITARY TRACK, WITH A GENUINE HUMANITARIAN BRIGHT SPOT — CIS is reporting today the culmination of the single most consistently volatile flashpoint it has tracked throughout this entire index. Read the full report #Lebanon #LebanonSecurityIndex #Security #SecurityIndex
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @cissecuritylb. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CIS Security Lebanon” (@cissecuritylb), 3 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cissecuritylb.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.