Взгляд на рынок Анатолия Радченко.
Трейдинг, новости, прогнозы, сигналы, юмор и жаркие споры. 18+
Я на boosty https://boosty.to/fincircle
Закрытый клуб трейдеров
https://t.me/circlefin/2277
Created
Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
7 measurements spanning 6 days, net +84. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,350–14,462 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 13:47
14,447
-2
11 Aug 2026, 16:25
14,449
+4
10 Aug 2026, 14:51
14,445
-1
9 Aug 2026, 11:53
14,446
+32
8 Aug 2026, 08:30
14,414
+45
7 Aug 2026, 11:12
14,369
+6
6 Aug 2026, 15:02
14,363
first reading
Engagement
22 posts held, back to 13 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
33.7%
avg views ÷ 14,447 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,870
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.518%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
21
of 22 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 19 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held
22 (13 July 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Views total
97,360
Reactions total
482
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
13 Aug 2026, 01:57 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
736
Videos
84
Links
578
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
15s
Average length
15s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
514 reactions across 20 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5330120410803501909
256
49.8%
custom 5330206288674584049
67
13.0%
custom 5330171117187397375
53
10.3%
custom 5330176339867630257
41
7.98%
custom 5330245368582008581
32
6.23%
custom 5330042693370278046
28
5.45%
custom 5330545488011751364
26
5.06%
custom 5330028369654346731
11
2.14%
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 514reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
12
across the posts below
Posts paid on
10
of 21 we hold a reading for · 48%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @circlefin. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 22 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 13 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Пока вы развлекаетесь с пенным и шашлыками на фазенде в последние недели лета, самое время прослушать нашу программу на РБК радио про криптовалюту, тем более что с 1 сентября вроде как все легализовано (но это не точно)
https://www.rbc.ru/story/697ba7ba9a79471972c766dd
Крипта больше не в тренде?
Объёмы спот-торгов BTC упали на 75% от максимума 8 месяцев назад, схожую тенденцию имеют спотовые объёмы по всему рынку.
Параллельно этому непреклонно растут и спотовые, и фьючерсные объёмы торгов RWA.
Только на Binance за семь месяцев 2026 года объём торгов TradFi фьючерсами (золото, сырьё и акции) перевалил за 116 млрд долларов.
На фоне относительного затишья в крипте многие уходят то…
Финансовый кружок Анатолия Радченко pinned «Индекс Бар LIVE в 19-00 на YouTube. Разберем все по полочкам https://youtube.com/live/4ZMvuuvCWD4?feature=share»
Пока я в небольшом отпуске, не расслабляйтесь
На Бусти продолжает выходить Индексбар, апдейты по портфелю и идеи что покупать: https://boosty.to/fincircle. Временно почти за три копейки доступна подписка уровня Start - формат для тех, кому пока достаточно вотчлиста на неделю.
Мой ютуб-курс по трейдингу тоже на месте, кто только присоединился или еще не смотрел: https://t.me/circlefin/2202
IFC Club (закрытый клуб-к…
Добавил еще 50 подписок Старт со скидкой 95%, торопитесь новый индекс бар уже вас ждет!
https://boosty.to/fincircle/posts/1df3f24b-0566-4938-b1e4-5c3c33a74a5c?share=ios_post_link
ТревоЖность по версии Банк оф Америка
Что сейчас больше всего беспокоит рынок AI и полупроводников? Краткая выжимка из свежего отчёта BofA.
1. Позиционирование всё ещё не очистилось
AI-железо стало слишком «народной» ставкой. По рынку уже ходят истории, что даже на автобусных турах для инвесторов в здравоохранение обсуждают $SNDK.
Поздних покупателей $MU ещё могут «вытряхнуть», а сильные дневные движения вынуждаю…
Тренд на шуршащие купюры
Наткнулся на интересную новость о том, что за первую половину июля россияне сняли 513 миллиардов со счетов.
Если пересчитать эту сумму на часы - с банковских счетов уходило больше миллиарда рублей каждый час.
Наличные стали объективным трендом, а россияне всё больше предпочитают бумажные деньги.
Оплатить покупку картой/СБП становится проблематично в условиях отключения сети в некоторых ре…
Открыто для подписчиков, летняя акция со скидкой 95% не пропустите.
https://boosty.to/fincircle/posts/24aa59ea-0e4a-4709-825c-a0b0c55f9f6d?share=post_link
SpaceX подтвердили Flight 13 на 23 июля.
Тесты ускорителя Super Heavy B20 на стартовом столе прошли успешно, начинается предстартовая подготовка. Скоро должны выкатить корабль S40 для интеграции. К слову, это также были самые странные тесты Super Heavy, которые мы видели: без полноценного прогона турбин Рапторов, но возможно с тестом системы зажигания.
Время запуска Flight 13 на 23 июля:
- 17:45 по Техасу (23 июля)…
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
custom 53301763398676302574
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @circlefin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 112,244 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Финансовый кружок Анатолия Радченко” (@circlefin), 14,447 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/circlefin.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.