Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Финансовый кружок Анатолия Радченко

Channel

Финансовый кружок Анатолия Радченко

@circlefin

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

15,874subscribers

+1,511 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001183927320
TypeChannel
Username@circlefin
DescriptionВзгляд на рынок Анатолия Радченко. Трейдинг, новости, прогнозы, сигналы, юмор и жаркие споры. 18+ Я на boosty https://boosty.to/fincircle
CreatedBetween 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 November 2026
Measurements held64
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/circlefin

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

14,36315,87415,118.56 August 20269 November 2026
64 measurements spanning 95 days, net +1,511. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,136–16,101 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 64
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Nov 2026, 22:4915,874+73
8 Nov 2026, 12:1815,801+145
7 Nov 2026, 06:5915,656+83
6 Nov 2026, 09:3115,573+39
5 Nov 2026, 08:5415,534+28
4 Nov 2026, 06:0615,506+16
3 Nov 2026, 07:5115,490+2
2 Nov 2026, 07:1415,488+10
1 Nov 2026, 05:1915,478+1
31 Oct 2026, 06:4415,477+11
30 Oct 2026, 07:3815,466-25
29 Oct 2026, 11:0915,491-2
28 Oct 2026, 11:1815,493+2
27 Oct 2026, 12:0715,491-16
26 Oct 2026, 11:1415,507-4
25 Oct 2026, 12:1815,511-13
24 Oct 2026, 12:5615,524-8
23 Oct 2026, 16:1915,532-20
22 Oct 2026, 15:0015,552-19
21 Oct 2026, 09:3815,571first reading

Engagement

73 posts held, back to 13 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 70 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
22.3%
avg views ÷ 15,874 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,540
37 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.33%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
37
of 73 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 36 of 37 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held73 (13 July 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total131,160
Reactions total1,703
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 06:51 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
785
Videos
86
Links
627

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
5m 22s
Average length
1m 47s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

2,864 reactions across 69 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53301204108035019091,07537.5%
custom 533020628867458404958220.3%
custom 533024536858200858129810.4%
custom 53300426933702780462759.60%
custom 53301711171873973751846.42%
custom 53305454880117513641826.35%
custom 53301763398676302571705.94%
custom 5330028369654346731983.42%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 69 of the 73 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,864 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 73 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
62
across the posts below
Posts paid on
32
of 71 we hold a reading for · 45%
Most on one post
9
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @circlefin. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 73 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 13 July 2026 to 10 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 9 of 37 posts held from the last 30 days (24.3%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

10 Nov 2026, 12:00 UTC≈1,780 views76 reactions3 Starsread 11 November 2026

• остаться без позиций — это тоже стратегия. не пауза, не слабость, а решение • ваша задача как трейдера — находиться минимальное количество времени в позиции с риском. не максимальное. минимальное • все трейдеры зарабатывают. проблема в том, что многие потом теряют больше, чем заработали, или отдают рынку почти всё обратно. у меня за 20 с лишним лет такое было много раз кажется, что на рынке нужно зарабатывать посто…

custom 533012041080350190952custom 533017111718739737513custom 53300426933702780466custom 53300283696543467312custom 53301763398676302572custom 53302062886745840491

10 Nov 2026, 11:02 UTC≈1,930 views44 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 533020628867458404922custom 533012041080350190912custom 53302453685820085817custom 53300283696543467313

9 Nov 2026, 16:35 UTC≈2,350 views31 reactions3 Starsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Мастер-класс прошел на все 100 Запись выложили в Финансовый кружок Pro ровно на неделю. Чтобы все успели пересмотреть, все зафиксировать и посмотреть еще раз) Что обсудили вчера: • риск-менеджмент: сколько рисковать на сделку, когда остановиться и почему винрейт 30–40% — это нормально • интрадей: почему стоит забыть про торговлю на пробой и что делать вместо этого • среднесрок: фазы рынка, скользящие средние, к…

custom 533017111718739737516custom 533012041080350190912custom 53302062886745840493

9 Nov 2026, 10:11 UTC≈3,570 views101 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

custom 533024536858200858183custom 533012041080350190914custom 53301711171873973754

8 Nov 2026, 08:17 UTC≈3,060 views69 reactions1 Starread 11 November 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 533012041080350190948custom 533004269337027804613custom 53302062886745840498

8 Nov 2026, 06:30 UTC≈3,120 views41 reactions1 Starread 11 November 2026
Photo

Портфель с 2024 года, после лопнувшего ИИ пузыря все равно 82%+. Из ИИ только $PLTR и тот который не лопнул, тогда и ИИ хайпа-то не было, а Палантир стоил 23! бакса. С биотехами не повезло, но это нормально, там все быстро меняется. Удивительно, что $ISRG флет. PS. Прошлый портфель вырос в 10 раз за 10 лет.

custom 533054548801175136420custom 533020628867458404912custom 53301204108035019097custom 53301763398676302572

7 Nov 2026, 12:34 UTC≈3,260 views18 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Уже завтра в 12:00 будем в прямом эфире учиться торговать американскими акциями. За 3 часа у вас сложится в голове четкая система работы с этим рынком и останется еще как минимум месяц подписки на Кружок Pro, чтобы обкатать теорию на практике и задать тысячу вопросов лично мне и Гоше. Что будем делать ну очень подробно рассказали здесь, не поленитесь изучить и не забудьте оформить подписку: https://finkruzhok.pro/.…

custom 533012041080350190912custom 53301711171873973754custom 53302062886745840492

6 Nov 2026, 16:39 UTC≈3,580 views34 reactions2 Starsread 11 November 2026

Теперь математика Доступ в Финансовый кружок Pro стоит 8900 рублей в месяц. При годовой подписке — 6320 в месяц. Сами считайте сколько это в год и сравнивайте со стоимостью любого минимально удовлетворительного курса. Можно юзать подписку столько, сколько вам нужно, чтобы “встать на ноги”. Можно отменять и возвращаться. Можно купить на месяц, посмотреть что да как. Или сразу на год выгодно, если настроены вдолгую. …

custom 533012041080350190929custom 53302062886745840494custom 53301711171873973751

6 Nov 2026, 15:42 UTC≈3,660 views66 reactions5 Starsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Если честно, я немного не понял. Вы сто лет просите обучение по трейдингу от Радченко. Чтоб за деньги и с моим вовлечением и вниманием. Я придумал вам обучение, только в 1000 раз эффективнее любых курсов и дешевле. Но нет, надо чтоб называлась “курс” и за стопицот денег. В общем объясняю математику и остальное. Что такое Финансовый кружок Pro По форме — телеграм с отдельными ветками по темам, по сути — место, гд…

custom 533012041080350190941custom 533020628867458404913custom 53300426933702780466custom 53302453685820085814custom 53301711171873973751custom 53305454880117513641

5 Nov 2026, 16:03 UTC≈3,770 views33 reactions2 Starsread 11 November 2026

Уже пригубили в эфире, го сюда: https://www.youtube.com/live/Wzo0gag4kuQ

custom 533004269337027804618custom 533020628867458404910custom 53301204108035019095

5 Nov 2026, 15:42 UTC≈3,570 views40 reactions2 Starsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Аттракцион невиданной щедрости, налетай

custom 533054548801175136419custom 533024536858200858115custom 53300283696543467316

5 Nov 2026, 12:29 UTC≈3,730 views37 reactions3 Starsread 11 November 2026

Выборы, чипы, ИИ и прогноз на ноябрь. Сегодня в ИндексБаре 🍿 В 19:00 встречаемся, чтобы обсудить: — ну да, американцы проголосовали. Как это (не) повлияет на рынок? — бум чипов и ИИ продолжается или инвесторы начинают уставать от обещаний? Что покупать? — и за чем будем следить в ноябре. Заодно еще раз про наш большой мастер-класс 8 ноября и базу, которую уже не разжевываем на индексбарах, но без которой никуда. Пи…

custom 533012041080350190930custom 53302062886745840497

Showing the 12 most recent of 73 posts we hold for @circlefin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@circlefin edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
5 November 2026
Most recent edit
9 November 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 2 posts on @circlefin as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
14 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
9 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
35 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

22 Jul 2026, 19:03 UTCAnonymous Poll484 voters

Новый ролик с общением ии?

  1. Космос36%
  2. Биотехи28%
  3. Заканчивай с ии36%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 73 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 10 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Финансовый кружок Анатолия Радченко” (@circlefin), 15,874 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/circlefin.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.