ᅠֵ 🖤 ₍ㅤ观心台ㅤ₎ TAKE 🤩🤩 Здравствуйте помогите пожалуйста, с каких артов начинать учиться апскейлить, я очень хочу, а выходит черт пойми что, какие статьи не читаю. Чувствую себя очень тупой, поделитесь опытом своим кто может как начинали , за сколько продвинулись ᅠ ᅠ🤩ᅠ отправить свой тейк 🖤

Channel
CINNABAR 朱砂
@cinnabarpngcm
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
200subscribers
+8 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1004292305495 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cinnabarpngcm |
| Created | Between 1 May 2026 and 4 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 3 times, most recently 14 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cinnabarpngcm |
Topic
Art & design — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 24 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 44% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 28 Aug 2026, 21:56 | 200 | +5 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 22:04 | 195 | +2 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 05:35 | 193 | +1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 20:47 | 192 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
18 reactions across 5 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5089479191414440704 | 6 | 33.3% | |
| custom 5350505983447702341 | 5 | 27.8% | |
| custom 5350814933330204593 | 5 | 27.8% | |
| custom 5251529145011180100 | 1 | 5.56% | |
| custom 5346287530994078534 | 1 | 5.56% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 18 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
ᅠֵ 🖤 ₍ㅤ观心台ㅤ₎ TAKE 🤩🤩 ᅠ ᅠЯ искренне хочу научиться клинить. Где найти хоть какие-то подсказки для чайника, чтоб поменьше ошибок совершать. Как у некоторых получается буквально подовину арта заклинить. У меня много вопросов, на которые не сущетсуует ответ дада прктика ᅠ ᅠ🤩ᅠ отправить свой тейк 🖤
ᅠֵ 🖤 ₍ㅤ观心台ㅤ₎ TAKE 🤩🤩 ᅠ ᅠИногда немного дизморалит, то что ты возможно никогда не сможешь хотя бы на йоту приблизиться к своим кумирам, иметь такую же крутую команду, так же круто резать и клинить, а все потому что у тебя нет денег, а никто реально скилловый не пойдет работать бесплатно, особенно клинер и я сейчас просто смотрю на свой бюджет на который нужно сделать оформление, купить пару реклам и заказать нескол…
ᅠֵ 🖤 ₍ㅤ观心台ㅤ₎ TAKE 🤩🤩 ᅠ ᅠЯ сейчас бегаю по просторам твиттера, откладываю какие-то арты на резку. У меня для этого есть частный канал и чат с темами, в канал я закидываю всё без разбора, просто красивый арт файлом и ссылка, в чате с темами лежат арты, которые могут быть вырезаны и они распределены по фандомам, иногда подписываю имена персонажей А как у вас этим дела обстоят? ᅠ ᅠ🤩ᅠ отправить свой тейк 🖤
ᅠֵ 🖤 ₍ㅤ观心台ㅤ₎ TAKE 🤩🤩 ᅠ ᅠУмоляю, кто сможет сделать апскейл одного арта, позарез надо, я заплачу если надо ᅠ ᅠ🤩ᅠ отправить свой тейк 🖤
ᅠֵ 🖤 ₍ㅤ观心台ㅤ₎ TAKE 🤩🤩 ᅠ ᅠздравия !! насколько вы бы оценили этот апскейл? (гружу ниже) файлы в комментариях. ᅠ ᅠ🤩ᅠ отправить свой тейк 🖤
custom 50894791914144407041custom 53462875309940785341custom 53508149333302045931
ᅠֵ 🖤 ₍ㅤ观心台ㅤ₎ TAKE 🤩🤩 ᅠ ᅠЕсть пнг и апскейл каналы по вуве? ᅠ ᅠ🤩ᅠ отправить свой тейк 🖤
ᅠֵ 🖤 ₍ㅤ观心台ㅤ₎ TAKE 🤩🤩 ᅠ ᅠЯ доделала... Как вам? Есть что стоит подкорректировать? файл в комментариях. ᅠ ᅠ🤩ᅠ отправить свой тейк 🖤
ᅠֵ 🖤 ₍ㅤ观心台ㅤ₎ TAKE 🤩🤩 ᅠ ᅠу кого-нибудь есть апскейл по умамусуме? или хотябы дейлик ᅠ ᅠ🤩ᅠ отправить свой тейк 🖤
ᅠֵ 🖤 ₍ㅤ观心台ㅤ₎ TAKE 🤩🤩 ᅠ ᅠнорм или стрем рисовать тут лайн с размером 2,4 или же 2,0? ᅠ ᅠ🤩ᅠ отправить свой тейк 🖤
ᅠֵ 🖤 ₍ㅤ观心台ㅤ₎ TAKE 🤩🤩 ᅠ ᅠв каких каналах ведется набор в адм на рендеры с зарплатой (звезды/пиар)? ᅠ ᅠ🤩ᅠ отправить свой тейк 🖤
ᅠֵ 🖤 ₍ㅤ观心台ㅤ₎ TAKE 🤩🤩 Стоит ли здесь рисовать лайн? Или просто убрать неровные части? ᅠ ᅠ🤩ᅠ отправить свой тейк 🖤
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @cinnabarpngcm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CINNABAR 朱砂” (@cinnabarpngcm), 200 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cinnabarpngcm.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.