Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Кино в Мануфактуре

Channel

Кино в Мануфактуре

@cinemaniakms

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

82subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003707505671
TypeChannel
Username@cinemaniakms
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/cinemaniakms

Growth

818281.57 August 2026 — 81 subscribers9 August 2026 — 81 subscribers16 August 2026 — 82 subscribers7 August 202616 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 9 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 81–82 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 08:1682+1
9 Aug 2026, 18:4781no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:2581first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 26 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
53.9%
avg views ÷ 82 subscribers
Avg views / post
44.2
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.49%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 14 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held16 (26 July 20269 August 2026)
Views total619
Reactions total8
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 18:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 00s
Average length
1m 30s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

8 reactions across 4 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
562.5%
👌225.0%
🔥112.5%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 02:46 UTC25 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Кстати, друзья, а не сходить ли нам на старого доброго Нолана вместе? Я вот еще не успел, но очень сильно собираюсь. Планирую «Одиссею» завтра в 22:00 в «Факеле». И даже проведу с собой еще пару-тройку человек — преданных союзников нашего киноклуба. Разумеется, те, кто сегодня будут на «Грации», в приоритете на получение билета. А после — посидим на скамейке и потолкуем, чего там наснимали. Как вам идея?

3

9 Aug 2026, 02:06 UTC25 viewsread 9 August 2026

Друзья, не забудьте, что сегодня смотрим «Грацию» Соррентино в 19:00 в Мануфактуре. Не опаздывайте.

7 Aug 2026, 23:54 UTC33 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @komsagramPhoto

Свежую итальянскую политическую драму покажут в Мануфактуре 9 августа 9 августа в 19:00 в арт-пространстве «Мануфактура» пройдет показ и обсуждение фильма одного из ведущих режиссеров современного итальянского кинематографа Паоло Соррентино. Фильм «Грация» вышел в 2025 году и сразу был назван одним из лучших в карьере режиссера, известного по сериалам «Молодой Папа» и «Новый Папа», а также по фильмам «Молодость» и «

5 Aug 2026, 09:25 UTC63 viewsread 9 August 2026
Video

Друзья, в воскресенье, 9 августа, смотрим драму «Грация» итальянца Паоло Соррентино У, кажется, главного современного итальянского режиссера Соррентино вы могли видеть «Молодость» или, например, сериалы «Молодой Папа» и «Новый Папа», а также его основное кино — оскароносную «Великую красоту». Были и те у нас, кто просил показать его же позапрошлую «Партенопу». Но в случае с ней меня пугают отзывы и критика: говорят

2 Aug 2026, 22:39 UTC45 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026

А вообще, меня не оставляет в покое вчерашнее обсуждение. Будто я что-то не договорил. Мне от такого кино сложно быстро отойти, надо остыть. Договорю сегодня. Задавали вопросы: мол, что не так-то, убил, наказали. Какие проблемы. Смотрите. На одной чаше весов у нас убийство преступное, дикое, горячее. Яцек, человек поломанный, но режиссер нам явно показывает и до, и после — не безнадежный. Он вообще-то стремится к

2

2 Aug 2026, 21:38 UTC45 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Вчера после просмотра «Короткого фильма об убийстве» был небольшой спор про эпизодического персонажа — я еще говорил, что он во всем «Декалоге» появляется на секунды. Итак, зрители меня действительно переспорили, это и правда человек со строительной рейкой на дороге. Впрочем, что в моей неудавшейся гипотезе, что так — миссия у него одна: тщетно попытаться остановить или наблюдать неотвратимое. Последние три кадра

2 Aug 2026, 03:21 UTC47 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Друзья, напоминаю, что сегодня в 19:00 смотрим «Короткий фильм об убийстве». Не опаздывайте.

👌2

31 Jul 2026, 12:25 UTC54 viewsread 9 August 2026
Poll

И вторая десятка

  1. Каш13%
  2. Неверная жена0%
  3. Прости, детка25%
  4. Комсомольск0%
  5. Чума13%
  6. Таинственная река25%
  7. Нефть50%
  8. Обсессия0%
  9. Барри Линдон13%
  10. Банши Инишерина38%

The shares total 177%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

31 Jul 2026, 12:24 UTC47 viewsread 9 August 2026
Poll

Выбираем лучшие фильмы

  1. Дьявол всегда здесь13%
  2. Бугония13%
  3. Грешники13%
  4. Простая случайность25%
  5. Галвестон25%
  6. Орудия0%
  7. После жизни25%
  8. Настоящая боль0%
  9. Забриски Пойнт38%
  10. Социальная сеть25%

The shares total 177%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

31 Jul 2026, 12:22 UTC45 viewsread 9 August 2026

А еще давайте поиграем Если вынести за скобки сборник мультиков, то мы с вами посмотрели уже двадцать фильмов. Давайте устроим гонку и выберем чемпиона. Будут два опросника — в каждом по десятку кинокартин. Вы можете проголосовать за любое количество фильмов в каждой голосовалке. Параллельно в ВК тоже будет голосование. Потом я суммирую результаты, и так у нас получатся финалисты. Но дело даже не в победителе, а в

31 Jul 2026, 12:00 UTC43 viewsread 9 August 2026

Наша художница Кира вместе с открыткой к «Короткому фильму об убийстве» прислала мне еще и проклятия. Добрые, разумеется. Она одновременно счастлива и несчастлива, что посмотрела это кино. Это правда очень тяжелая и сложная для переживания картина. Даже не знаю, привлечь вас это должно или оттолкнуть. Очень надеюсь на первое. Потому что смотреть такое — это душеспасительный болезненный опыт. Кино, которое я отношу

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @cinemaniakms. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

31 Jul 2026, 12:25 UTCAnonymous Poll8 voters

И вторая десятка

  1. Каш13%
  2. Неверная жена0%
  3. Прости, детка25%
  4. Комсомольск0%
  5. Чума13%
  6. Таинственная река25%
  7. Нефть50%
  8. Обсессия0%
  9. Барри Линдон13%
  10. Банши Инишерина38%

The shares total 177%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

31 Jul 2026, 12:24 UTCAnonymous Poll8 voters

Выбираем лучшие фильмы

  1. Дьявол всегда здесь13%
  2. Бугония13%
  3. Грешники13%
  4. Простая случайность25%
  5. Галвестон25%
  6. Орудия0%
  7. После жизни25%
  8. Настоящая боль0%
  9. Забриски Пойнт38%
  10. Социальная сеть25%

The shares total 177%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 9 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Кино в Мануфактуре” (@cinemaniakms), 82 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cinemaniakms.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.