Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Киноклуб любителей отсылок и Даша

Channel

Киноклуб любителей отсылок и Даша

@cinemaclub_ds

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

226subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001163641979
TypeChannel
Username@cinemaclub_ds
CreatedBetween 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/cinemaclub_ds

Growth

226227226.57 August 2026 — 227 subscribers8 August 2026 — 227 subscribers15 August 2026 — 226 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 226–227 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 08:58226-1
8 Aug 2026, 10:18227no change
7 Aug 2026, 11:33227first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 10 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
20.9%
avg views ÷ 226 subscribers
Avg views / post
47.2
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
10.6%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 14 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026
Posts held14 (10 July 20263 August 2026)
Views total425
Reactions total45
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 10:18 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
15s
Average length
15s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

100 reactions across 14 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4646.0%
🔥2626.0%
😁55.00%
🤣55.00%
44.00%
👍33.00%
🥰33.00%
❤‍🔥22.00%
😎22.00%
custom 521517210941156745811.00%
🐳11.00%
🙏11.00%
🤔11.00%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 100reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 06:34 UTC26 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

в голосовании лидирует сэр Кристофер Нолан, поэтому предлагаю вам делиться своими любимыми мемами по «Одиссее», пока они все не протухли 👁 хорошего понедельничка

🤣5😁2🐳1

31 Jul 2026, 13:43 UTC42 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Многоумные любители отсылок, голос возвысив, кидаю вам крылатое слово. Какую экранизацию Одиссеи хотите обсудить 23 августа?

  1. «Одиссея» Кристофера Нолана (2026)80%
  2. «Возвращение Одиссея» Уберто Пазолини (2024)20%
  3. «Одиссей» Андрея Кончаловского (1997)30%
  4. «Странствия Одиссея» Марио Камерини (1954)20%

The shares total 150%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

3custom 52151721094115674581

31 Jul 2026, 11:41 UTC42 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

утро началось со споров с Алисой о том, участвовал ли Эврилох в Троянской войне

😁3

26 Jul 2026, 06:02 UTC61 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥2

26 Jul 2026, 06:02 UTC56 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

этим прекрасным саундтреком из фильма «Глухая» напоминаю, что сегодня встречаемся на обсуждении в 16:00 мск ещё можно успеть посмотреть фильм и присоединиться

3

24 Jul 2026, 08:01 UTC55 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Как тема фильма влияет на операторские решения Продолжаю рассказывать о «Глухой» в преддверии нашей встречи 26 июля. Глухой человек получает значительную часть информации через зрение. Поэтому режиссёрка Эва Либертад и операторка Джина Феррер решили не размывать пространство за спинами персонажей и сохранять глубину резкости. Главная героиня читает мир глазами — а значит, ей важно видеть не только лицо собеседника,

🔥52👍1

23 Jul 2026, 16:31 UTC47 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

✍️Чтобы не путаться в дорожках субтитров Переводческие субтитры переводят речь с иностранного языка на язык зрителя. Обычно они передают только диалоги: предполагается, что музыку, интонации и фоновые звуки зритель слышит сам. SDH — Subtitles for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing — субтитры для глухих и слабослышащих зрителей. Помимо речи, они описывают важные звуки: [скрип двери], [напряжённая музыка], [говорит шёпотом

🔥32

23 Jul 2026, 14:48 UTC44 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Для Эвы Либертад было принципиально, чтобы «Глухую» субтитровали целиком — не только сцены на жестовом языке, но и все звучащие реплики и важные для сюжета звуки. Иначе фильм не мог бы стать «местом встречи» глухих и слышащих зрителей. На фестивальных обсуждениях команда также добивалась перевода на жестовый язык. Кстати, наград они собрали немало — среди них несколько премий «Гойя» и призы Берлинале. Во многих стра

4🤔1

22 Jul 2026, 05:34 UTC52 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Я человек простой: хожу в кино с понедельника по среду, когда цена билета со скидкой 50%. Про «Одиссею». Кинорежиссёр Нолан рассказал нам, что война — это плохо 🫪 Уж теперь мы запомним, про атомную бомбу-то помните ещё? Понравилось, что приключения Одиссея оказались не залихватскими, как в пересказе Куна, а страшными. Древняя магия, чудовища, трансформации и жертвоприношения — не для детишек. Нолан даже заходит на

7

17 Jul 2026, 13:23 UTC64 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

У киномузыки есть универсальный знак приближающихся неприятностей — Dies Irae (День гнева). Это мрачный григорианский хорал XIII века, описывающий Страшный суд. В музыкальном мире эта секвенция быстро стала главным символом рока, смерти и неизбежной трагедии. Сначала его веками цитировали классики (тут и Реквием Верди, и «Пляски смерти» Листа), а потом хорал перекочевал в кино. 🔸Как вышло, что четыре ноты [Di-es-i

🔥844

17 Jul 2026, 12:58 UTC54 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

В следующем фильме киноклуба нас ждут эксперименты со звуком. В «Глухой» мы будем переключаться между миром слышащих и глухих. Звук то возвращается, то исчезает, то превращается в гул, вибрацию или обрывок речи. На встречах мы нечасто говорим о звуковом и музыкальном оформлении фильма, но в этот раз тему будет сложно игнорировать. А чтобы получше настроить уши, предлагаю вам ознакомиться с одним музыкальным расслед

7🙏1

14 Jul 2026, 08:30 UTC76 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Захотелось посмотреть с вами что-то летнее, но не мейнстримное. На примете было сразу несколько фильмов, с которыми я познакомилась в прошлом году на кинофестивале в Мар-дель-Плате. Оставалось выбрать тот, который не разобьёт нам сердце и не заставит наматывать сопли на кулак, — и, кажется, получилось! 💛Обещаю тепло испанского солнца и размышления о тонкостях коммуникации, уязвимости и границах близости. ☑️26 июля,

6🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @cinemaclub_ds. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

31 Jul 2026, 13:43 UTCFinal Results10 voters

Многоумные любители отсылок, голос возвысив, кидаю вам крылатое слово. Какую экранизацию Одиссеи хотите обсудить 23 августа?

  1. «Одиссея» Кристофера Нолана (2026)80%
  2. «Возвращение Одиссея» Уберто Пазолини (2024)20%
  3. «Одиссей» Андрея Кончаловского (1997)30%
  4. «Странствия Одиссея» Марио Камерини (1954)20%

The shares total 150%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 3 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 456,821 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Киноклуб любителей отсылок и Даша” (@cinemaclub_ds), 226 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cinemaclub_ds.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.