Channel
@cineklub
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
94subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002877872622 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cineklub |
| Description | Cineclube do Soviete de Shitgrado Adm: @ErebusSerf |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cineklub |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 12:47 | 94 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:01 | 94 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 12 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (12 April 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 644 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 12:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
22 reactions across 11 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 9 | 40.9% | |
| 😢 | 5 | 22.7% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 13.6% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 9.09% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 9.09% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 4.55% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 22reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 April 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
CINECLUBE 1º DE MAIO — SEMANA #058 A Última Gargalhada (1924), de F. W. Murnau Nesse sábado terminaremos nossa maratona de Kammerspielfilme com este que provavelmente é o mais famoso e mais historicamente importante das quatro obras que veremos. Dirigido pelo lendário diretor F. W. Murnau e mais uma vez com roteiro de Carl Mayer, acompanhamos alguns dias na vida de um porteiro de hotel. A "técnica da câmera livre"…
CINECLUBE 1º DE MAIO — SEMANA #057 A Noite de São Silvestre (1924), de Lupu Pick Dando sequência à nossa maratona de Kammerspielfilme, o estilo de cinema minimalista tipicamente alemão, essa semana assistiremos este filme de Lupu Pick que narra a história de um homem dividido entre sua mãe e sua esposa conforme a rivalidade entre ambas se torna cada vez mais visceral. Vale notar que Lupu Pick é o mesmo diretor do …
CINECLUBE 1º DE MAIO — SEMANA #055 Estilhaçado (1921), de Lupu Pick Nesse sábado começamos nossa maratona de Kammerspielfilm, um estilo de cinema da Alemanha dos anos 1920 inspirado nas peças de teatro minimalistas de Max Reinhardt. Todos os poucos filmes produzidos dentro dessa tendência tem roteiro de Carl Mayer (O Gabinete do Dr. Caligari). Poucos cenários, pouco ou nenhum diálogo, poucas personagens (todas sem…
Nossa seção da semana 54 não pôde acontecer no dia típico (último sábado), faremos ela ao longo da semana.
Nossa seção ficará adiada para amanhã às 16:00 🤕
😢5
CINECLUBE 1º DE MAIO — SEMANA #053 Matou a Família e foi ao Cinema (1969), de Júlio Bressane Ao lado do também diretor Rogério Sganzerla, Júlio Bressane é o principal nome do cinema marginal: mais do que cineastas, ambos eram teóricos do cinema, com amplo conhecimento da história da sétima arte e das vanguardas artísticas internacionais, os marginais foram responsáveis por adaptar o irreverente espírito da Nouvelle…
❤1
Este filme lendário teve sua estreia no Chaplin Club, um cineclube brasileiro fundado em 13 de junho de 1928 e uma das instâncias mais antigas de cinefilia e cineclubismo militantes de toda a história mundial. O clube publicava sua revista, O Fan, onde elaborava críticas e buscava estabelecer teorias estéticas sobre a sétima arte de forma pioneira. Peixoto, que havia vivido na Europa e tido contato com as vanguardas …
CINECLUBE 1º DE MAIO — SEMANA #052 Limite (1931), de Mario Peixoto 🎉 ESPECIAL ANIVERSÁRIO DO CINECLUBE & DIA DO CINEMA BRASILEIRO 🎉 Sexta-feira da semana passada, 19 de junho, foi comemorado o dia do cinema brasileiro e, simultaneamente, o aniversário de um ano do nosso cineclube! Em comemoração à esta doce efeméride iremos assistir Limite, filme mudo brasileiro do ano de 1931 feito pelo cineasta e poeta Mario P…
CINECLUBE 1º DE MAIO — SEMANA #051 O Bandido da Luz Vermelha (1968), de Rogério Sganzerla Nesse que é provavelmente o mais conhecido dentre os filmes produzidos no âmbito da tendência ou movimento conhecido como "cinema marginal", o diretor Rogério Sganzerla promove um diálogo entre o gênero clássico do policial, o sensacionalismo do rádio e da televisão e um comentário satírico sobre a situação política e econômic…
👏1
No caso específico do filme de hoje, A Margem, muitos menos satírico do que seus sucessores, mas igualmente crítico e "sujo", acompanhamos uma série de desajustados — um cafetão, uma prostituta, um deficiente mental, dentre outros — vivendo suas vidas agoniantes e miseráveis em uma favela às margens do rio Tietê (por isso o nome), em São Paulo. Sem passado que se conheça e sem nenhuma perspectiva de futuro, eles vag…
CINECLUBE 1º DE MAIO — SEMANA #050 A Margem (1967), de Ozualdo Ribeiro Candeias Aqui é onde se inicia nossa breve jornada pelo chamado "cinema marginal" brasileiro — que deve seu nome justamente a este filme — uma tendência que buscava fazer um diálogo crítico e satírico com as tradições roliudianas comerciais bem como com as chanchadas nacionais. Nessa tentativa, a originalidade do cinema marginal se dava por um …
CINECLUBE 1º DE MAIO — SEMANA #049 Nascido para Matar (1987), de Stanley Kubrick Com este filme encerramos nossa pequena maratona de filmes do Sr. Kubrick: aqui seu típico humor negro encontra agora a Guerra do Vietnã, onde acompanhamos o soldado "Hilário" (em inglês "Joker"), um repórter de guerra tentando conciliar seus ingênuos ideais pacifistas com o novo ambiente de carnificina em que se encontra. O filme est…
❤🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @cineklub. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 466,260 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@cineklub named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Cineclube 1º de Maio” (@cineklub), 94 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cineklub.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.