Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 道祖朋友圈

Channel

道祖朋友圈

@cibei

4 usernames

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

274subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 15 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002648867810
TypeChannel
Usernames@cibei @id294 @id324 @xinmo
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded15 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/cibei

Growth

27327527415 Aug 2026, 11:48 — 273 subscribers15 Aug 2026, 12:00 — 273 subscribers16 Aug 2026, 07:27 — 275 subscribers16 Aug 2026, 08:14 — 275 subscribers16 Aug 2026, 17:44 — 274 subscribers16 Aug 2026, 21:04 — 274 subscribers15 Aug 2026, 11:4816 Aug 2026, 21:04
6 measurements spanning 1 day, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 273–275 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 21:04274no change
16 Aug 2026, 17:44274-1
16 Aug 2026, 08:14275no change
16 Aug 2026, 07:27275+2
15 Aug 2026, 12:00273no change
15 Aug 2026, 11:48273first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 4 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

16 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 81.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1381.3%
💩318.8%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 16reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 January 2026 to 12 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Jul 2026, 04:12 UTC66 viewsread 15 August 2026

常规空降料招微信会议大牛 贴户大车 能吃量的来谈 联系人:@xingmai

Signed 道祖

27 Jun 2026, 23:33 UTC111 viewsread 15 August 2026

空降招各种丝滑独家通道 必过通道 测试成功并且长期稳定就有1888U红包 欢迎各位老板来谈 !!! 联系人: @xingmai

Signed 道祖

25 Jun 2026, 05:21 UTC127 viewsread 15 August 2026

料找车 来支付宝授权码丝滑大车,来支付宝登录付 大额出金车 有的来吃量 联系人:@xingmai

Signed 道祖

24 Jun 2026, 18:50 UTC135 viewsread 15 August 2026

空降招各种大额丝滑独家通道 有就来谈 测试成功丝滑就有红包 欢迎骚扰各位老板 !!! 联系人:@xingmai

Signed 道祖

2 Apr 2026, 11:12 UTC416 viewsread 15 August 2026

极品+888匿名号码 短号码出售 +8888377 | +8888378 | +8888380 | +8888687 46万U/任意一只号码 有喜欢联系 @daozu Premium anonymous short numbers (+888) for sale. +8888377 | +8888378 | +8888380 | +8888687 460,000 USDT/any number. Contact @daozu if interested.

25 Mar 2026, 16:30 UTC451 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo

TG官方出品 直接可以支持 中文字母 支持自己星星,冲TG会员 购买 major官方认证频道和群聊标记 需要的 自己打开网站 支持多种货币自助开通 有不懂的可以随时联系 @daozu 官网:https://spend.tg/?r=UQDVvHELMPBgJXt7VuVBdvllgjo94JMYWPmWN8LFWmjgsiQM

20 Mar 2026, 04:10 UTC248 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo

😐 TON 两天狂跌 10% 与此同时,比特币也从 76,000 美元暴跌至 70,500 美元! 📉 +888地板价 直接回落至 ~2300 美元 💸 礼物市值跌至 1.18 亿美元,创下去年 12 月底以来新低。

19 Mar 2026, 06:45 UTC232 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo

🔥 +888 8666 —— 60 万美元 售出 🔥 +888 8899 —— 60 万美元 售出 实际价值远不止这个价, +888 8666 更是有老板开到 90 万美元。 奈何 梦幻哥(原新币老板) 不差钱,更看重人情世故,也就按先来先得的规矩出了。

10 Mar 2026, 10:57 UTC258 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo

🔥 +8888 777 以 880235 美元(≈651,358 TON) 天价成交 一举登顶 +888 成交价排行榜 TOP1, 中文社区大佬拿下。

6 Mar 2026, 16:23 UTC270 viewsread 15 August 2026

市场的智慧远超过我们能够理解的范围 不应该对抗市场或试图击败

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @cibei. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,547,126 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“道祖朋友圈” (@cibei), 274 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cibei.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.