🤩| 😡🙁☹️🥺😢😒🤯🌟🌟🌟 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟😖😢🙂🙁😢🌟 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 🌑🌑🌟•🌑🌑🌑🌑 •🌟 🌑🌑 🌑🌑🌟𝗶𝗻𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗴𝗿𝗮𝗺 𝗽𝗼𝘀𝘁 🌟 🌑🌑 ᥕɦᥱᥒ ⲙy ᥣifᥱ ᥕᥲs sɦᥲᴛᴛᥱrᥱɗ, I rᥱᥲᥣiᤁᥱɗ f᧐r ᴛɦᥱ firsᴛ ᴛiⲙᥱ ᴛɦᥲᴛ ɦᥲρρiᥒᥱss rᥱsᴛs ᧐ᥒ ᴛɦᥱ ᴛɦiᥒᥒᥱsᴛ sᥣi᥎ᥱr ᧐f gᥣᥲss. 🦋|: 𝒑𝒉𝒐𝒕𝒐 𝒃𝒚: chtoline 🦋|: 𝒓𝒆𝒑𝒐𝒔𝒕𝒔?/𝒓𝒆𝒂𝒄𝒕𝒔? 🦋|: #косплей5 #пост5 #шинобу

Channel
Chtholinity 🔮✨
@chtholinity
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
88subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002706844664 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @chtholinity |
| Description | Links: linktr.ee/chtholine |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/chtholinity |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 15:17 | 88 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 08:32 | 88 | first reading |
Engagement
13 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 55.2%
- avg views ÷ 88 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 48.5
- 13 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 5.92%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 13
- of 13 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 13 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 13 (31 July 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 631 |
| Reactions total | 27 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 15:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 883
- Videos
- 24
- Links
- 158
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 2m 53s
- Average length
- 1m 27s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
27 reactions across 9 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 81.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 22 | 81.5% | |
| 😭 | 3 | 11.1% | |
| 🍓 | 2 | 7.41% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 27reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Вітаю всіх з оголошенням результатів відбору! 🥳 Дуже радий за тих, хто пройшов — вже не можу дочекатися побачити ваші виступи! ❤️ І тим, хто цього разу не потрапив до списку, теж хочу сказати: не засмучуйтеся 🫶 Ваші роботи й талант від цього нікуди не діваються, а можливостей показати їх ще буде багато!
❤3
Стільки буде гостей з інших міст на коміквейвііі, мабуть дійсно буде як невеликий фанкон 🔥 Хвилююся, щоб встигнув всіх кого хочу знайти, зробити фото ✨
❤2
Особистий кабінет ЄДЕБО
😭3
На днях вирішив поекспериментувати з чорно-білою фотографією і персонажі Ніер чудово підійшли ✨ https://www.instagram.com/p/DbvWKwUjJ-I/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link&igsh=NTc4MTIwNjQ2YQ==
❤2
Друзі, якщо вам потрібні повні відео виступів пишіть, скину! ✨
❤2
🤩➿🌟🌟🌟🌟➿🤩 🤩🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 🤩🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 𝒟𝑒𝓃𝒿𝒾, 𝓌𝒽𝒾𝒸𝒽 𝒹𝑜 𝓎𝑜𝓊 𝓉𝒽𝒾𝓃𝓀 𝒽𝒶𝓈 𝒾𝓉 𝒷𝑒𝓈𝓉, 𝓉𝒽𝑒 𝓉𝑜𝓌𝓃 𝓂𝑜𝓊𝓈𝑒 𝑜𝓇 𝓉𝒽𝑒 𝒸𝑜𝓊𝓃𝓉𝓇𝓎 𝓂𝑜𝓊𝓈𝑒? 🪻🪻🪻 🌟rᴇᴩᴏsᴛs?/rᴇᴀᴄᴛs? 🤩🤩 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 🌟🌟 🌟🌟 ᴘʜᴏᴛᴏɢʀᴀᴘʜᴇʀ #пост 💣
❤1
❕️❕️❕️❕️❕️❕️❕️❕️❕️❕️ ❕️❕️❕️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️❕️ 🤩ㅤ𝐶ℎ𝑎𝑖𝑛𝑠𝑎𝑤 𝑚𝑎𝑛ㅤ🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩❕️❕️ㅤㅤ🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 𝐂𝐨𝐦𝐞 𝐨𝐧, 𝐡𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐢𝐭 𝐨𝐯𝐞𝐫.🤩🤩🤩 𝐉𝐮𝐬𝐭 𝐝𝐨𝐧'𝐭 𝐛𝐥𝐚𝐦𝐞 𝐦𝐞 𝐢𝐟🤩🤩🤩 𝐜𝐢𝐠𝐚𝐫𝐞𝐭𝐭𝐞𝐬 𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐫𝐭 𝐭𝐚𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 🤩🤩🤩 𝐛𝐞𝐭𝐭𝐞𝐫 𝐚𝐟𝐭𝐞𝐫 𝐈 𝐥𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐦 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐲𝐨𝐮🌬️ 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩Post in Instagram 🤩ㅤㅤㅤ 🌬️🌬️🌬️🌬️🤩Photographer 🤩 Repost/React?🌬️🌬️🌬️ #пост #cosplay 🌬️
❤2
Постарався якомога більше відео вставити під один мотив, хоча класних виступів було дуже багато. Це була непроста але дуже цікава праця 🎉 Іноді над деякими секундами працюєш годину, щоб було саме так як бачиш. Десь для потрібного ефекту сповільнюєш, десь прискорюєш, додаєш ефектиків В той момент я не думав що зроблю таку нарізку, але в майбутньому буду знімати в вищої якості щоб було видно більше деталей при наближе…
❤5🍓1
До нашої команди прийшла біда, і ми звертаємось до косплей-спільноти з проханням про допомогу. У нашої подруги Pugoffka та HibariRin сталася страшна біда — внаслідок пожежі згорів їх таунхаус. Постраждали також котики, які проживали з родиною. Зараз їм надається медична допомога, проте стан їх важкий і вони борються за життя. Родинам терміново потрібна підтримка — на лікування тварин та подолання наслідків пожежі. …
А ось і відео з Крісталс! В тіктоці трошки прискорили щоб залишився звук https://vt.tiktok.com/ZS4DBcMXy/
❤5🍓1
❌❌🔠🔠🔠⭐🔠🔠🔠🔠 "So here I am. A hero? A villain? I'm the guy who can do the things that Batman can't...become someone that Batman won't. Am I the man that Bruce wanted me to become? Not even close. But someday soon he'll realize, I'm exactly who he needs." ❌❌❌⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️ 🔫Photo by Chtholine 🏃♂Пост в інсті Буду вдячний реакціям/коментам/репостам 🙏 #косплей #dc
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @chtholinity. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 515,219 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@alosa_uwu · 2521 post«Holly!°ホリˎˊ˗ー»⋆📆
@holly_cha · 521 postМиска Рису
@muska_rusy · 1081 postNaomi~♡
@naomi8i8 · 1621 postГера постінг
@odyforzmain · 741 post🤍🤏🤫|•рест
@Phosdyratypai · 2591 post.орєшек (гнилий))
@thisisnoterehh · 691 post👁️🗨️ сігма вумєн || маікусе
@yasigmasigma · 2241 post𝘽𝙪𝙧𝙞𝙖𝙡 𝙤𝙛 𝙔𝙖𝙩𝙤(Але поки шо просто Ято)
@yato_5x · 451 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Chtholinity 🔮✨” (@chtholinity), 88 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chtholinity.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.