Channel
@chrysoskinand
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
428subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003065116102 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @chrysoskinand |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/chrysoskinand |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 17:54 | 428 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 07:16 | 428 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 24 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (24 June 2026 – 22 July 2026) |
| Views total | 164 |
| Reactions total | 18 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 07:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
278 reactions across 20 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5776375003280838798 | 135 | 48.6% | |
| 💘 | 63 | 22.7% | |
| 🕊 | 45 | 16.2% | |
| ⚡ | 10 | 3.60% | |
| 🍓 | 7 | 2.52% | |
| ❤ | 6 | 2.16% | |
| 💋 | 5 | 1.80% | |
| custom 5778527486270770928 | 4 | 1.44% | |
| 🐳 | 2 | 0.719% | |
| 💅 | 1 | 0.36% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 278reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 June 2026 to 22 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🤩 🌟🌟 🎀а, я кинню #гиацину , и если честно, мне не хочется, чтобы меня возносили до уровня героя. Это слишком громкое звание для того, кто просто делает свою работу.
custom 57763750032808387986🐳1💘1
🤩 🌟🌟 🎀а, я кинню #гиацину , и я искренне верю, что из любой непонятной ситуации выход есть всегда. И он может быть таким, что никто не останется в проигрыше — ни морально, ни физически. Это не наивность, это моя внутренняя опора.
💘6🕊3custom 57763750032808387981
🤩 🌟🌟 🎀а, я кинню #темень , и я могу найти красоту в самых страшных вещах. Что-то странно для других — кажется мне искренне прекрасным 🌟🔤 ✨ @CHRYSOSKINAND
custom 57763750032808387989🕊4🍓3💘2
🤩 🤩🤩 🎀а, я кинню #касторию , и люди порой не замечают красоты в простых вещах. Даже обычное звёздное небо имеет куда больше символизма, чем кажется. Эти моменты мимолётные, но от этого прекрасные 🤩🔤 ✨ @CHRYSOSKINAND
custom 57763750032808387986❤4🕊3💘2custom 57785274862707709281
🤩 🩶🩶 🎀а, я кинню #аглаю , и тишина имеет особое звучание. Нечто большее, чем бессмысленный оркестр сумбурного хаоса. 🩶🔤 ✨ @CHRYSOSKINAND
custom 57763750032808387985🕊2⚡1💅1💘1
🤩 🌟🌟 🎀а, я кинню #темень , и порой мои решения и действия могут показаться радикальными. Для меня это кажется единственным правильным решением, ведь я не собираюсь сидеть с проблемой бок об бок. 🤩🔤 ✨ @CHRYSOSKINAND
custom 57763750032808387984🍓1💘1🕊1
🤩 🌟🌟 🎀а, я кинню #касторию , и я часто могу загоняться в своих мыслях. Я не посмею об этом сказать, ведь мне кажется, что никто не способен меня понять. Я предпочту одиночество, чем пустой разговор 🌟🔤 ✨ @CHRYSOSKINAND
custom 57763750032808387986💘3🕊2🍓1
🤩 🩶🩶 🎀а, я кинню #аглаю , и на мой взгляд, истина — лежит не всегда на дне. Иногда люди пропускают что-то крайне очевидное, ищя в этом особенный подвох. 🩶🔤 ✨ @CHRYSOSKINAND
custom 57763750032808387988⚡2🕊2💘1
🤩 🤍🤍 🎀а, я кинню #гисиленсу , и я глубоко привязываюсь к людям, это может доходить даже до зависимости от близкого человека 🤍🔤 ✨ @CHRYSOSKINAND
custom 577637500328083879811🕊5⚡3🐳1💘1
🤩 🌟🌟 🎀а, я кинню #гиацину , и я всегда стараюсь держать внутренний свет, даже когда вокруг темно. Мне трудно, иногда кажется, что я на грани, но я не позволяю себе утонуть в отчаянии. Я сохраняю надежду и улыбку 🌟🔤 ✨ @CHRYSOSKINAND
custom 57763750032808387989💘4🕊3🍓1
🤩 🌟🌟 🎀а, я кинню #гиацину , и для меня всегда на первом месте те, кто мне дорог. Я готов/а многое отдать и многое сделать ради них. Но я не забываю и о себе — о своём состоянии, здоровье, отдыхе. Потому что я понимаю: если я выгорю, сломаюсь или просто перестану справляться, я не смогу быть опорой для них. А значит — забота о себе — это тоже часть заботы о близких 🌟🔤 ✨ @CHRYSOSKINAND
custom 577637500328083879811💘4🕊3🍓1
🤩 🍓🌟 🎀а, я кинню #темень , и мне крайне важно сохранять контроль над ситуацией ☂️🔤 ✨ @CHRYSOSKINAND
custom 57763750032808387985💋2🕊2💘1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @chrysoskinand. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,048,787 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“да ,я кинню и . . |CHRYSOS” (@chrysoskinand), 428 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chrysoskinand.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.