Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

chrysalis

@chrysaliscd

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

62subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001698196667
TypeChannel
Username@chrysaliscd
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/chrysaliscd

Growth

629 Aug 2026, 22:31 — 62 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 04:01 — 62 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 22:3110 Aug 2026, 04:01
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 61–63 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 04:0162no change
9 Aug 2026, 22:3162first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 10 May 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
150
Videos
73
Links
73

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
23s
Average length
23s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

298 reactions across 16 posts, in 29 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 12.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54161262461426182813612.1%
💘3411.4%
custom 52561624612408018023210.7%
3110.4%
custom 6314371806597745222258.39%
💋206.71%
🔥196.38%
❤‍🔥186.04%
custom 5417956524980986088165.37%
custom 5348307660271788404124.03%
🍓103.36%
🥰93.02%
😈62.01%
👍51.68%
😁41.34%
🐳31.01%
😱31.01%
👏20.671%
💔20.671%
😎20.671%
9 further kinds93.02%

Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 298reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 10 May 2025 to 6 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 17 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @chrysaliscd. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 May 2025 to 6 May 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 May 2026, 17:46 UTC44 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @c0nv3rsati0nPhoto

💥💥💥 💥💥💥💥 💥💥💥💥0️⃣💥💥 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 🩷arise as Moka from chrysalis 🌟release: 09.05 ed: KI

custom 54179565249809860883🍓1🔥1custom 52561624612408018021

29 Sept 2025, 02:57 UTC607 views11 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

КТО ставит ЧТО

❤‍🔥3💋3💘3custom 52561624612408018021custom 54179565249809860881

24 Jul 2025, 15:54 UTC286 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @bbtcdPhoto

♟️♟️♟️♟️♟️♟️♟️♟️♟️♟️♟️ 🌟🌟🌟 bubble blast team bubble blast team 🌟🌟🌟 ♟️♟️♟️♟️♟️♟️♟️♟️♟️♟️♟️ YURIM AS JONGHO 🤲 25.07 🤲 19:00

custom 54179565249809860885❤‍🔥1💘1

12 Jun 2025, 15:36 UTC318 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @mvxcdtPhoto

🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️ ✨Kill this love✨ 🔤🔤🔤❔жк Аристократ 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤❔19 июня 🔤🔤 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤❔В 18.00 Kiriki from Kill Shot, Feat. Сhrysalis, Juolia.m

custom 63143718065977452225

1 Jun 2025, 14:03 UTC349 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @soulmatescdteamVideo

' сегодня в 20:00 выйдет наш первый кавер!! https://youtu.be/kwN3rzLu6-c?si=eeE6gUGlyL9OjcrW soulmates • FTS • chrysalis • Twinkle ph & ed by sarra prod

3

29 May 2025, 13:22 UTC344 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @soulmatescdteamPhoto

🌟🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️ 🌟🌟 🌟🌟🌟 🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🌟 🌟🌟🌟 ⭐ 🤩 Kari as Taehyun ⭐ From chrysalis 🖤realese: 01.06.25 🖤 ph & ed by sarra prod

17 May 2025, 14:05 UTC≈1,380 views29 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

кавер уже на канале🤣

🍓8😈6💋5❤‍🔥3💘2🔥2🦄1custom 54179565249809860881

16 May 2025, 08:12 UTC557 views36 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🌼🌼🌼🌼🌼 🌼🌼🌼🌼 ⚜𝐀𝐫𝐢𝐬𝐞 𝐚𝐬 𝐋𝐢𝐳⚜ ꜰʀᴏᴍ ᴄʜʀʏꜱᴀʟɪꜱ 방금 내가 말한 감정 감히 의심하지 마 그냥 좋다는 게 아냐 (what's after like?) ph: eva ed: yur!m ⚜𝟏𝟕.𝟎𝟓.𝟐𝟓⚜

❤‍🔥10custom 52561624612408018028custom 54161262461426182817😁4🍌1👀1💊1💔1

16 May 2025, 06:31 UTC957 views33 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🌼🌼🌼🌼🌼 🌼🌼🌼🌼 ⚜𝐊𝐚𝐫𝐢 𝐚𝐬 𝐖𝐨𝐧𝐲𝐨𝐮𝐧𝐠⚜ ꜰʀᴏᴍ ᴄʜʀʏꜱᴀʟɪꜱ You-ooh and I-I, it's more than like L 다음 또 O 다음 난, yeah, yeah, yeah ph: eva ed: yur!m ⚜𝟏𝟕.𝟎𝟓.𝟐𝟓⚜

9🔥9🥰9🐳2💅1💋1💘1🙏1

15 May 2025, 11:47 UTC243 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @soulmatescdteamPhoto

▫️ 🅰️🅰️ 🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️ I met the devil by the window . . ✨ 17 . О5 ✨ ЖК « Аристократ » ✨ 17 : ОО - 18 : ОО ✨ feat . fts , chrysalis , twinkle dream on , dream on , good night . . ▫️всех ждем !! будем очень рады вашей поддержке 👋

😱3🍓1🎉1💘1

15 May 2025, 08:02 UTC≈1,070 views20 reactions1 Starread 10 August 2026
Photo

🌼🌼🌼🌼🌼 🌼🌼🌼🌼 ⚜𝐘𝐮𝐫𝐢𝐦 𝐚𝐬 𝐘𝐮𝐣𝐢𝐧⚜ ꜰʀᴏᴍ 𝟦+𝟦 / ᴄʜʀʏꜱᴀʟɪꜱ You-ooh and I-I, it's more than like What's after like? ph: eva ed: yur!m ⚜𝟏𝟕.𝟎𝟓.𝟐𝟓⚜

custom 63143718065977452227custom 52561624612408018024custom 54179565249809860884custom 541612624614261828121💋1💘1

15 May 2025, 06:35 UTC692 views22 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🌼🌼🌼🌼🌼 🌼🌼🌼🌼 ⚜𝐉𝐮𝐥𝐢 𝐚𝐬 𝐋𝐞𝐞𝐬𝐞𝐨⚜ ꜰʀᴏᴍ ᴄʜʀʏꜱᴀʟɪꜱ 그게 뭐가 중요하니, 지금 네게 완전히 푹 빠졌단 게 중요한 거지 ph: eva ed: yur!m ⚜𝟏𝟕.𝟎𝟓.𝟐𝟓⚜

custom 541612624614261828110custom 53483076602717884045custom 63143718065977452224👍2💘1

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @chrysaliscd. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,178,111 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“chrysalis” (@chrysaliscd), 62 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chrysaliscd.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.