Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Chronos Genetica 🧬

Channel

Chronos Genetica 🧬

@chronosGenetica11

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

109subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001906700517
TypeChannel
Username@chronosGenetica11
CreatedBetween 1 March 2023 and 30 November 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/chronosGenetica11

Growth

10910 Aug 2026, 04:30 — 109 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 20:11 — 109 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 04:3010 Aug 2026, 20:11
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 108–110 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 20:11109no change
10 Aug 2026, 04:30109first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 5 June 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 October 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

47 reactions across 11 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1634.0%
🔥1634.0%
612.8%
👏48.51%
🤔24.26%
❤‍🔥12.13%
👎12.13%
🥰12.13%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 47reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 5 June 2024 to 31 October 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Oct 2024, 03:15 UTC312 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @aryaanaamFile

File, posted without a caption

👍21

31 Oct 2024, 03:15 UTC310 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @aryaanaamPhoto

New paper, 'The Rise and Transformation of Bronze Age Pastoralists in the Caucasus' by Ghalici et al., just published, with some new samples; the G25 coordinates for this study are posted below.

👏4

30 Oct 2024, 16:57 UTC223 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @aryaanaamPhoto

Here is the G25 coords (individuals & averages) for "The Genetic Origin of the Indo-Europeans" study.

🔥3

10 Oct 2024, 10:45 UTC390 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Greek historian Herodotus wrote in 430 BC that Scythians used wooden stakes to pose dead men atop dead horses in an open-air tableau around the graves of their kings. Excavations at Tunnug 1 suggest a similar display was created hundreds of years before Herodotus's account. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-03204-9#:~:text=The%20Greek%20historian%20Herodotus%20wrote,of%20years%20before%20Herodotus's%20accoun

3🔥1

30 Sept 2024, 05:01 UTC337 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Simulated G25 coordinates from this preprint(https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.05.24.595769v1): https://pastebin.com/VZCTDN9G North Pontic crossroads: Mobility in Ukraine from the Bronze Age to the early modern period -Saag et al. 2024

👍2

22 Sept 2024, 19:39 UTC324 viewsread 10 August 2026

DNA analysis of 21 individuals provided additional insights. Genetic sex determination matched osteological assessments, except for one individual. Among the non-adults, 1 child from the Muslim cemetery was genetically male, while 1 child from the Christian cemetery was female, and the other seven Christian children were male. Kinship through uniparental markers (mitochondrial DNA and Y-chromosomal haplotypes) and n

22 Sept 2024, 19:39 UTC248 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

The paper analyzed the chronological relationship between burials at two cemeteries in Segesta to determine if the communities coexisted. Radiocarbon dating of bone collagen from 25 individuals—9 from the Muslim cemetery and 16 from the Christian cemetery—revealed that Muslim burials began before Christian ones. Bayesian chronological modeling estimates the Islamic burials occurred between 770–990 CE and ended by 119

22 Sept 2024, 19:31 UTC209 viewsread 10 August 2026

New G25 Coords for: https://pastebin.com/NDpeRUpD "Multi-proxy bioarchaeological analysis of skeletal remains shows genetic discontinuity in a Medieval Sicilian community" by A. Monnereau et al. 2024. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsos.240436 This paper investigates the impact of medieval regime changes on the local population of Segesta, western Sicily, during the 12th-13th centuries by analyzin

22 Sept 2024, 17:48 UTC218 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026

The study presents new genome-wide data from 131 individuals across 38 archaeological sites spanning 6,000 years. It reveals a genetic divide between populations north and south of the Caucasus mountains during the Mesolithic, with eastern hunter-gatherer ancestry in the north and a mix of Caucasus hunter-gatherer and East Anatolian farmer ancestry in the south. During the Eneolithic period, interaction between the m

👍1🥰1

22 Sept 2024, 17:48 UTC235 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026

https://pastebin.com/3siHTyV6 New G25 coords for: "The rise and transformation of Bronze Age pastoralists in the Caucasus" This is based on an upcoming paper by Ghalichi et al., presented by Sabine Reinhold at the Budapest conference which have been posted to the European Nucleotide Archive.https://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena/browser/view/PRJEB73987 It highlights the genetic history of the Caucasus and it's pivotal role du

👍1

3 Jul 2024, 15:32 UTC717 views13 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Facial reconstruction of Predmosti 3(26,000 YBP),an Upper Paleolithic man from Moravia(Czech Republic), belonging to the Gravettian culture. Studies indicate that the individuals from Předmostí 3 are closely related to other Upper Paleolithic populations across Europe, such as those from the Goyet Caves in Belgium and the Sunghir site in Russia. Archaeologists identify 2 main variants of the Gravettian culture: Wes

👍10🤔2👎1

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @chronosGenetica11. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,095,744 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Chronos Genetica 🧬” (@chronosGenetica11), 109 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chronosGenetica11.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.