Channel
@christofbitschi
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
213subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001213142958 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @christofbitschi |
| Description | Landesobmann Vorarlberger Freiheitliche - FPÖ |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/christofbitschi |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:50 | 213 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:35 | 213 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 2 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (2 February 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 595 |
| Reactions total | 40 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 10:50 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
206 reactions across 20 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 111 | 53.9% | |
| ❤ | 39 | 18.9% | |
| 👏 | 35 | 17.0% | |
| 🔥 | 16 | 7.77% | |
| 🤷♂ | 2 | 0.971% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 0.485% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.485% | |
| 🤨 | 1 | 0.485% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 206reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 February 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Jetzt online: bei Dialektisch im Gespräch über meine politische Laufbahn, die Arbeit in der Vorarlberger Landesregierung und aktuelle Herausforderungen für Österreich. Dabei geht es unter anderem um Bürokratie, die Europäische Union, politische Verantwortung, den Umgang mit Kritik sowie die Frage, warum Politik oft an den Menschen vorbeigeht. Außerdem sprechen wir über Herbert Kickl, den politischen Stil der FPÖ, Vor…
❤5👏1
https://t.me/Austria_First/1289
👍7🤨1
Vorarlberg gemeinsam an die Spitze bringen! #vorarlberg #unservorarlberg #vorarlbergimherzen #gemeinsam #dieperspektive lsthcb
👍8
https://youtu.be/0TD-ufSYdU0?si=TxZGTvZt479ngl1a
👍7❤1
Photo, posted without a caption
👍9🔥1
Gemeinsam mit voller Kraft für unser Vorarlberg! #vorarlberg #unservorarlberg #vorarlbergimherzen #gemeinsam (lsthcb)
👏6❤2💯1🔥1
Naturschutz mit Hausverstand - ermöglichen statt verhindern. Unter dem Deckmantel des Naturschutzes wurden in der Vergangenheit immer neue Hürden und Genehmigungspflichten aufgebaut. Mit der Überarbeitung des Naturschutzgesetzes sorgen wir als Landesregierung jetzt für einen vernünftigen Kurswechsel: Naturschutz mit Hausverstand statt ideologischer Hürden. Wir schützen wertvolle Natur, ohne Menschen unnötig zu bel…
🔥7👍4❤3🤷♂1
DANKE DANIEL! Daniel Allgäuer hat über viele Jahre hinweg Verantwortung für unser Land übernommen und die freiheitliche Politik in Vorarlberg entscheidend mitgestaltet. Wir haben gemeinsam viele Höhen und Tiefen erlebt, wichtige Entscheidungen getroffen und unsere Partei Schritt für Schritt weiterentwickelt. Dabei war Daniel immer ein wichtiger Partner, auf den man sich zu 100 Prozent verlassen konnte. Aus der polit…
👏7👍2
Mein Ziel. Für euch: Vorarlberg als Familienland Nummer 1. #vorarlberg #unservorarlberg #vorarlbergimherzen #gemeinsam #familie (lsthcb)
👏8🤷♂1
Gemeinsam für unsere Familien. Wie letzte Woche bekannt geworden ist, will die Bundesregierung in Wien den Familienbonus kürzen. Viele Familien, die ohnehin schon massiv belastet sind, kommen dadurch finanziell noch mehr unter Druck. Ich sage: Mit dieser ungerechten Belastungspolitik muss endlich Schluss gemacht werden! Für mich ist klar: Unsere Familien müssen gestärkt und dürfen nicht geschwächt werden. Sie müss…
👍9
Immer wenn man glaubt, es geht nicht mehr schlimmer, kommt die Verliererampel in Wien mit neuen Belastungen daher. Jetzt soll der Familienbonus gekürzt werden. Mit dieser ungerechten Politik muss endlich Schluss gemacht werden! Ich sage: Unsere Familien müssen gestärkt und nicht geschwächt werden. #vorarlberg #unservorarlberg #vorarlbergimherzen #gemeinsam #familie
❤8
Pensionskürzungen sind ungerecht! Die Bundesregierung in Wien hat ein weiteres Belastungspaket zulasten der Bevölkerung präsentiert. Besonders getroffen von den Belastungen werden die Pensionistinnen und Pensionisten, wo es zu Pensionskürzungen kommen soll. Ich sage ganz klar: Es sind nicht unsere Pensionisten, die vielfach ein Leben lang gearbeitet haben, die unser System belasten, sondern es sind vielmehr jene, …
❤7👍3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @christofbitschi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Christof Bitschi” (@christofbitschi), 213 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/christofbitschi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.