So after 6 months of hype, this was the "REMIGRATION" rally that would send shockwaves through Australia 😆 🤣
🤣28🥴4😭3🍾1👍1💔1

Channel
@chrisbexposed
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
91subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002497580015 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @chrisbexposed |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 30 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/chrisbexposed |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Aug 2026, 14:26 | 91 | +1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 21:24 | 90 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 15:17 | 89 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:19 | 89 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 24 April 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
282 reactions across 17 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤣 | 107 | 37.9% | |
| 😁 | 42 | 14.9% | |
| 🤮 | 34 | 12.1% | |
| 😭 | 23 | 8.16% | |
| 🥴 | 22 | 7.80% | |
| 🤡 | 21 | 7.45% | |
| 👍 | 18 | 6.38% | |
| 💔 | 4 | 1.42% | |
| 💅 | 2 | 0.709% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 0.709% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 0.709% | |
| 🤩 | 2 | 0.709% | |
| 🍾 | 1 | 0.355% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.355% | |
| 🤓 | 1 | 0.355% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 282reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 24 April 2025 to 14 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
So after 6 months of hype, this was the "REMIGRATION" rally that would send shockwaves through Australia 😆 🤣
🤣28🥴4😭3🍾1👍1💔1
So, a jew, a sexual pervert and 2 teenage dweebs. Awesome
🤣18🤮6😭1
Photo, posted without a caption
😁13🤮9🥴2😭1
The infamous location of the "White Fox" incident.... I wonder what it's like training here with Chris's woman just days after seeing her tits plastered all over telegram.
🤣10😭4🤮2
Most Loyal Chris B fanatic...
😁7
What faggot sends that shit 🤣 and thinks we'll think less if Chris 🤣🤣 my cocks been sent a thousand times before I became a Christian. It's something that I had to take up with Jesus Christ and repent for!!
🤣10🥴6😭2
Here is Chris's "girlfriend" explaining how her showing her tits to strangers online is the same as a man walking down the street topless (which she admits turns her on) Chris Cuck Boyle, once a swinger, always a swinger
🤣15🤮3
Voice message, posted without a caption
🤣17🤩2
^^^ very Christ-like ✝️
🤮8👍3
Voice message, posted without a caption
🤡10🤮4👍1
This NSM member decided to stand up to the Commander/CumDemander Fuhrer Boyler and was later booted from the organisation
😭12💔3👍1
Theyre your womans boobs, why are we projecting to nsn instead of addressing the key issue. You run a christian nationalist org, youre meant to be the solid standard not being degenerate
👍11💯2🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @chrisbexposed. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Chris B Exposed” (@chrisbexposed), 91 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chrisbexposed.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.