National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 73% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. They sit inside a group of 4 channels that share the same post bodies with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
No sample pairs were kept for this entry. The counts below were measured, but without the pairs there is nothing here for you to open and check, so treat the relationship as recorded rather than demonstrated.
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 64 comparable posts for this entry, running 5 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Across the whole group of 4, the earliest publisher we hold is @chpyug — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 8 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 3 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
69 measurements spanning 49 days, net -213. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 28,303–28,580 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 69
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
24 Sept 2026, 21:42
28,335
no change
24 Sept 2026, 20:42
28,335
-56
18 Sept 2026, 19:56
28,391
no change
18 Sept 2026, 16:20
28,391
-13
16 Sept 2026, 09:18
28,404
no change
16 Sept 2026, 09:00
28,404
-15
14 Sept 2026, 16:20
28,419
no change
14 Sept 2026, 12:42
28,419
+23
13 Sept 2026, 02:18
28,396
no change
13 Sept 2026, 00:20
28,396
-11
11 Sept 2026, 02:38
28,407
no change
11 Sept 2026, 00:01
28,407
-14
8 Sept 2026, 02:00
28,421
no change
8 Sept 2026, 00:42
28,421
-15
5 Sept 2026, 00:40
28,436
-4
5 Sept 2026, 00:17
28,440
-18
3 Sept 2026, 09:32
28,458
no change
3 Sept 2026, 09:14
28,458
-18
2 Sept 2026, 03:57
28,476
no change
2 Sept 2026, 01:17
28,476
first reading
Engagement
464 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 69 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 464 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,020
Videos
≈1,630
Links
≈1,160
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
2h 20m
Average length
35s
Measured directly from 241 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
771 reactions across 222 posts, in 30 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
234
30.4%
😭
75
9.73%
🙏
65
8.43%
🤬
52
6.74%
😱
44
5.71%
😢
42
5.45%
👍
37
4.80%
🤡
28
3.63%
🤣
24
3.11%
😁
22
2.85%
😡
22
2.85%
🤯
20
2.59%
💯
17
2.20%
🙉
15
1.95%
🕊
14
1.82%
🔥
10
1.30%
👎
8
1.04%
😨
8
1.04%
🤔
7
0.908%
👏
5
0.649%
10 further kinds
22
2.85%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 260 of the 464 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 771 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 464 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 27 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
0.216%
1 of 464 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
1,090
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
741
over 463 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2VtzqvQkKh5
1
24 August 2026
24 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 464 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 27 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
😔Два человека пострадали в массовом ДТП с бензовозом на Кубани.
Авария произошла на трассе Краснодар — Кропоткин в Кавказском районе. Водитель грузовика MAN не выдержал дистанцию и врезался в Hyundai Accent. От удара легковушку отбросило в ехавший впереди Volvo с полуприцепом-бензовозом.
Травмы получили водитель и пассажир Hyundai. Обстоятельства аварии устанавливаются.
⚡️Чтобы оставаться в курсе всех событий края…
😟 В Анапе блогер устроил провокации на улицах города. Местные просят проверить его действия.
На опубликованных кадрах молодой человек вместе с компанией ходит по городу и оскорбляет прохожих.
Жители Анапы требуют, чтобы правоохранители проверили действия участников ролика и дали им правовую оценку.
⚡️Чтобы оставаться в курсе всех событий края переходите в наш МАХ 👉 https://max.ru/krasnodarkray1
*Уже подписано 17…
📢Краснодар и близлежащие, тревога по БпЛА.
Lpr
Вся информация по БПЛА на территории края будет опубликована в нашем канале в MAX 🇷🇺
👇👇👇
https://max.ru/krasnodarkray1
https://max.ru/krasnodarkray1
https://max.ru/krasnodarkray1
⚠️ Момент нападения психа на таксиста в Армавире.
За минуту до этого таксист (он на чёрном авто) отказался везти неадеквата, объехал многоквартирный дом и после началось вот это.
Напомним, инцидент произошёл в Северном микрорайоне вечером 26 августа у дома №2 на проспекте Авиаторов. Очевидцы сообщают, что двое мужчин, предположительно снимавших квартиру в этом доме посуточно, начали вести себя агрессивно и пристава…
В Армавире двое мужчин избили таксиста, который отказался их везти. Пострадавший серьезно ранен
Об инциденте в Северном микрорайоне сообщают наши читатели. По их словам, вечером 26 августа у дома №2 на проспекте Авиаторов двое мужчин, предположительно снимавших квартиру посуточно, начали вести себя агрессивно и приставать к прохожим.
Позже у них возник конфликт с приехавшим водителем такси — мужчина отказался брать…
🐕Настроение жаркого августа в Сочи — плюхнуться в реку, как этот собакен, и отказываться выходить
0% осуждения, 100% понимания.
❗️Подпишись — https://max.ru/tipichkrasnodar
🙃 Очередь за бензином в Анапе закончилась дракой.
Потасовка произошла на АЗС «Экоойл» на улице Парковой. По словам очевидцев, у водителей, несколько часов простоявших в очереди за топливом, не выдержали нервы.
Видео без цензуры 👇👇👇
https://max.ru/chpyug
https://max.ru/chpyug
https://max.ru/chpyug
❗️Сирены будут периодически включать по всему Краснодару.
В мэрии объяснили, что это плановая проверка системы оповещения. Поэтому жители разных районов могут время от времени слышать одиночные сигналы.
Если возникнет реальная опасность, власти отдельно сообщат об этом через оф каналы.
⚡️Чтобы оставаться в курсе всех событий края переходите в наш МАХ 👉 https://max.ru/krasnodarkray1
*Уже подписано 170 000 человек
⛽️ Бензин в Краснодаре резко подешевел после разборок с АЗС.
Антимонопольщики обратили внимание на цены на заправках «Степная», «Уфимнефть», «Лаба», «Южная нефтяная компания» и «Нефтесфера». В отношении части компаний возбудили дела, после чего стоимость топлива пошла вниз.
Например, на «Степной» АИ-95 подешевел со 140 до 120 рублей за литр, а дизель — со 135 до 100 рублей.
⚡️Чтобы оставаться в курсе всех событий …
👀 Канье Уэста позвали выступить под Анапой — в музее пыток.
После новостей об отмене концертов рэпера в Санкт-Петербурге директор Музея Средневековья и пыток в Сукко записал публичное обращение к артисту и пригласил его в Краснодарский край.
«Мистер Канье Уэст, мы знаем, что ваш концерт в Санкт-Петербурге отменен. Как русский человек, мы привыкли помогать друг другу. И хотим пригласить вас в Краснодарский край», — …
😡Разбитые электросамокаты, повреждённая плитка и искорёженные магазинные тележки — такой ущерб, по словам соседей, оставляет после себя компания подростков на Тюляева, 8.
Ребята регулярно собираются у коммерческих помещений, распыляют огнетушители и катаются на тележках. Местные также утверждают, что подростки делают зажигательные смеси.
На видео — очередные развлечения компании. Жители говорят, что записи происход…
❗️Задержан житель Славянска-на-Кубани, который нанёс свастику.
Мужчина признался в содеянном и заявил, что раскаивается. По его словам, он думал, что поступок останется безнаказанным.
«Сегодня меня задержали. Я раскаиваюсь в содеянном и больше такого не повторится», — заявил задержанный
⚡️Чтобы оставаться в курсе всех событий края переходите в наш МАХ 👉 https://max.ru/krasnodarkray1
*Уже подписано 170 000 челове…
👏2
Showing the 12 most recent of 464 posts we hold for @chpyug. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 9 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Типичный Краснодар и край @tipichkrasnodar · 29,229 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 8 September 2026
Краснодар и край @krasnodarkray1 · 189,204 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 11 August 2026
Краснодар Новости Bigbro_krd @bigbro_krd · 32,791 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 4 September 2026
Краснодар ДТП и ЧП | КРДДТП | Авто новости Кубани @krddtp1 · 43,476 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 28 August 2026
Типичный Краснодар @krdtipical · 33,454 Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 4 September 2026
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ЧП Краснодара” (@chpyug), 28,335 subscribers as measured 24 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chpyug.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.