Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

aikawa kamo

@chosos_dear

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

41subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003524644273
TypeChannel
Username@chosos_dear
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/chosos_dear

Growth

4112 Aug 2026, 12:49 — 41 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 21:53 — 41 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 12:4912 Aug 2026, 21:53
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 40–42 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 21:5341no change
12 Aug 2026, 12:4941first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 5 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
167.2%
avg views ÷ 41 subscribers
Avg views / post
68.6
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
17.8%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 12 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 9 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held12 (5 July 202610 August 2026)
Views total617
Reactions total105
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 12:49 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

189 reactions across 11 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 16.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53012798428498241583116.4%
custom 53795738238908021152613.8%
custom 53008762662478544992211.6%
custom 52877176675689197652010.6%
custom 52581547806053247631910.1%
custom 53031432444759630011910.1%
custom 53618216760844376931910.1%
👻126.35%
custom 525374062796685674973.70%
🆒73.70%
custom 531926183583104102131.59%
custom 521305936345908195121.06%
custom 524019743644138547721.06%

Custom emoji. 11 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 189reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 5 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 12 we hold a reading for · 33%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @chosos_dear. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 July 2026 to 10 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 18:48 UTC26 views13 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @JJKOC_CFPhoto

https://t.me/JJKOC_CF/12786 Вторая волна пошла! Прекрасные Ри и айкава На сегодня пока хватит,завтра продолжу · ───────🩵─────── · ✧ ⁺ ✦[ @JJKOC_CF ]✦ ⁺ ✧ #тейк #JJKOC

custom 53795738238908021155👻3custom 52877176675689197653custom 52130593634590819512

8 Aug 2026, 22:08 UTC36 views10 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @DollyzailovePhoto

🍵 Всем привет, а у меня (а соответственно и у моей селфсоны) день рождения Вот такой вот артик с плюшевым мужем нарисовала для себя Спасибо, что вы со мной!! #арт #доллизаи

custom 53795738238908021154👻3custom 52877176675689197653

3 Aug 2026, 18:26 UTC81 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026

у моей любимой сегодня годовщина, очень люблю Иссочку и поздравляю ее!! моя дорогая ❤️

🆒3👻2

3 Aug 2026, 18:25 UTC63 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @JJKOC_CFPhoto

У НаоЦуки первая годовщина! Артов нет, но не могу не показать чудесный кмм от чудесной @koshamakino которая как чувствовала и отправила мне арт к такой важной дате! А сколько вашим сш/охк? · ───────🩵─────── · ✧ ⁺ ✦[ @JJKOC_CF ]✦ ⁺ ✧ #тейк #JJKOC

👻3🆒3

31 Jul 2026, 20:55 UTC65 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Карочи кто не видел

custom 52877176675689197653custom 53795738238908021153👻1🆒1

27 Jul 2026, 12:15 UTC96 views25 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

😀😁😂🌟 сегодня мико решила сделать мне такой прелестный подарок!! 🥲 мне безумно приятно было получить этот арт от такой художницы, я в восторге! ⭐

custom 530314324447596300110custom 52581547806053247637custom 53795738238908021156custom 52877176675689197652

24 Jul 2026, 11:01 UTC110 views18 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @channel_k4m1Photo

прогрев перед артами для видео скетч для айкашки

custom 52581547806053247636custom 53795738238908021156custom 53031432444759630014custom 52877176675689197652

24 Jul 2026, 04:37 UTC112 views20 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

дорогие мои друзья, подписчики! сегодня выяснилось, что у прекрасной художницы Сетсу был копирщик, который завел аккаунт (скриншот) и начал использовать ее ос, загружать туда ее работы, выставляя за свои, принял на себя ее имя. это очень низкий поступок от очередного слабоумного человека, ибо у меня нет других подходящих слов, чтобы правильно назвать его. хочу попросить у вас помощи, чтобы справедливость восторжест

custom 52877176675689197657custom 52581547806053247636custom 53031432444759630015custom 53795738238908021152

9 Jul 2026, 17:58 UTC158 views39 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🔠🔠🔠 🤩 🌨️🌨️🌨️🌨️🌨️🌨️🌨️🌨️🌨️🌨️🌨️ ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ маленькие кругляшки айкава и чосо. давненько хотела нарисовать подобное. ⭐

custom 530127984284982415814custom 536182167608443769311custom 530087626624785449910custom 52537406279668567492custom 52401974364413854771custom 53192618358310410211

6 Jul 2026, 19:30 UTC169 views19 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @DabischosenPhoto

🤩esult for… @chososhime вы с Чосо как брауни!!

custom 53012798428498241587custom 53618216760844376936custom 53008762662478544995custom 53192618358310410211

5 Jul 2026, 16:32 UTC179 views26 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

✨COLLABORATION:🎀 🎀JUJUTSU KAISEN 🔤 CHUPA CHUPS ©🎀 🥹pop-up shop 🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️ наконец-то пришло мое время нарисовать первую официальную коллаборацию магической битвы! приятный опыт, особенно приятно смотреть на чибиков в этой иллюстрации.🌟

custom 530127984284982415810custom 53008762662478544997custom 52537406279668567495custom 53618216760844376932custom 52401974364413854771custom 53192618358310410211

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @chosos_dear. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 446,682 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“aikawa kamo” (@chosos_dear), 41 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chosos_dear.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.