Channel
@JJKOC_CF
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
740subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002503587237 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @JJKOC_CF |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/JJKOC_CF |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 10:51 | 740 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:01 | 740 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (6 August 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 3,033 |
| Reactions total | 209 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 11:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
209 reactions across 15 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5244685063085389009 | 73 | 34.9% | |
| ❤ | 38 | 18.2% | |
| custom 5262503409222708570 | 24 | 11.5% | |
| custom 5262517243312370666 | 22 | 10.5% | |
| 💘 | 17 | 8.13% | |
| custom 5262538426091073541 | 13 | 6.22% | |
| 🍓 | 12 | 5.74% | |
| 💋 | 7 | 3.35% | |
| ❤🔥 | 3 | 1.44% |
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 209reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Перерисовала наконец Неоню и переделала кинн лист, теперь все мои пять персонажей собрались новые красивые. Почитать что у её внешностью случилось можно у меня в тгк Неанон Эриза @ErizasDen · ───────🩵─────── · ✧ ⁺ ✦[ @JJKOC_CF ]✦ ⁺ ✧ #тейк #JJKOC
custom 52625034092227085705❤2
Signed ___ .𖥔 ݁ ˖ Dumjet ᵇʳⁱᵈᵉ ᵒᶠ ᵗʰᵉ ᵐᵒᵒⁿ
Хару и Кибо Неанон: @cupofashes1903 · ───────🩵─────── · ✧ ⁺ ✦[ @JJKOC_CF ]✦ ⁺ ✧ #тейк #JJKOC
custom 524468506308538900911❤9custom 52625172433123706662🍓1
Signed ___ .𖥔 ݁ ˖ Dumjet ᵇʳⁱᵈᵉ ᵒᶠ ᵗʰᵉ ᵐᵒᵒⁿ
ваши осы и осхканоны как дуо из других медиа? не обязательно шип может у кого-то есть и простые дружеские/семейные взаимоотношения 🤔 · ───────🩵─────── · ✧ ⁺ ✦[ @JJKOC_CF ]✦ ⁺ ✧ #тейк #JJKOC
custom 524468506308538900910🍓2
Signed ₊ 🐦⬛️ nevermore ♡
давайте заполним) · ───────🩵─────── · ✧ ⁺ ✦[ @JJKOC_CF ]✦ ⁺ ✧ #тейк #JJKOC
custom 52625034092227085707custom 52446850630853890092🍓1
Signed слепо ангел настоящи
кто-нибудь имеет опыт письма статьи для оса на вики? была бы рада помощи... · ───────🩵─────── · ✧ ⁺ ✦[ @JJKOC_CF ]✦ ⁺ ✧ #тейк #JJKOC
custom 52446850630853890094❤1
Signed слепо ангел настоящи
У меня дошлли руки до моего фембоя и вот вот я начинаю скетчить Киньте свои випки Неанон: @SatmatchMarie · ───────🩵─────── · ✧ ⁺ ✦[ @JJKOC_CF ]✦ ⁺ ✧ #тейк #JJKOC
custom 526250340922270857011❤6💋3❤🔥1🍓1
Signed Господин Диджей @рбуз
что вам кажется самым запоминающимся в осах? какая-то фишка дизайна, лор и ТД? · ───────🩵─────── · ✧ ⁺ ✦[ @JJKOC_CF ]✦ ⁺ ✧ #тейк #JJKOC
custom 52446850630853890099🍓2
Signed слепо ангел настоящи
как вы относитесь к ос х ос, когда авторы этих ос разные люди? что делать в ситуациях когда ты и автор второй ос поссорились? переписывать лор или просто удалить персонажа? · ───────🩵─────── · ✧ ⁺ ✦[ @JJKOC_CF ]✦ ⁺ ✧ #тейк #JJKOC
custom 524468506308538900911💋3
Signed слепо ангел настоящи
Немного фактов о Кей Перевод: С детства служит клану Годжо и в настоящее время работает личным ассистентом Сатору Годжо в Токийском магическом техникуме. Ее главная обязанность — писать отчеты о Годжо и отправлять их клану Годжо и старейшинам, что его ужасно раздражает. Она отлично справляется с бумажной работой и составлением расписания, в основном потому, что кому-то приходится разбирать беспорядок, который ост…
custom 524468506308538900917💘5🍓1
Signed ___ .𖥔 ݁ ˖ Dumjet ᵇʳⁱᵈᵉ ᵒᶠ ᵗʰᵉ ᵐᵒᵒⁿ
Снова поменяла ос, Соры больше нет ✌️ · ───────🩵─────── · ✧ ⁺ ✦[ @JJKOC_CF ]✦ ⁺ ✧ #тейк #JJKOC
❤12❤🔥2
Signed ___ .𖥔 ݁ ˖ Dumjet ᵇʳⁱᵈᵉ ᵒᶠ ᵗʰᵉ ᵐᵒᵒⁿ
Целуются.....😳🤯 Cr: @krut_porn, @liyosena Неанон Анн @nanamianddzi · ───────🩵─────── · ✧ ⁺ ✦[ @JJKOC_CF ]✦ ⁺ ✧ #тейк #JJKOC
custom 526251724331237066616❤8custom 52446850630853890093💘1
Signed ___ .𖥔 ݁ ˖ Dumjet ᵇʳⁱᵈᵉ ᵒᶠ ᵗʰᵉ ᵐᵒᵒⁿ
опишите 1 видео из тик тока взаимоотношения ваших осхос/охк · ───────🩵─────── · ✧ ⁺ ✦[ @JJKOC_CF ]✦ ⁺ ✧ #тейк #JJKOC
🍓4
Signed ___ .𖥔 ݁ ˖ Dumjet ᵇʳⁱᵈᵉ ᵒᶠ ᵗʰᵉ ᵐᵒᵒⁿ
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @JJKOC_CF. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 218,545 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“JJK OC CONFESSION” (@JJKOC_CF), 740 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/JJKOC_CF.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.