Невигадана ситуація 🤭

Channel
2 ББпС «Чорний рій»
@chornyriy
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
638subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002490914997 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @chornyriy |
| Description | 2-й батальйон безпілотних систем «Чорний рій» 1 обр ТРО ім. Івана Богуна. Місія каналу - розвіювати наративи ворога, піднімати рівень освіченості і гуртувати громадян навколо цінностей підрозділу. Головна зброя воїна - розум. Зв'язок – @chornyriy1 |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/chornyriy |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:32 | 638 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 00:48 | 638 | first reading |
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 17 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 56.0%
- avg views ÷ 638 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 357
- 14 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 10.1%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 15
- of 15 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 13 of 14 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (17 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 5,001 |
| Reactions total | 506 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 17:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 230
- Videos
- 87
- Links
- 134
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
506 reactions across 13 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 181 | 35.8% | |
| 👍 | 114 | 22.5% | |
| 🔥 | 54 | 10.7% | |
| 🫡 | 42 | 8.30% | |
| 🙏 | 35 | 6.92% | |
| 💔 | 30 | 5.93% | |
| 😭 | 20 | 3.95% | |
| 😁 | 16 | 3.16% | |
| 🤗 | 8 | 1.58% | |
| 🥰 | 4 | 0.791% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 0.198% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.198% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 506reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Під час служби доводиться ділити побут в обмеженому просторі із людьми різного характеру та світогляду. У таких умовах навіть спокійні люди можуть почати дратуватися через дрібниці. Наші бійці, із якими ми поспілкувалися на цю тему, кажуть: уникнути конфліктів повністю — неможливо, але варто зводити такі моменти до мінімуму. Наші топ-5 порад, як це зробити: 1. Поважайте чужий простір. Особливо коли “хочеться почит…
❤16👍14🫡3🔥1
Важкий БпАК “Вампір” — чудовий винахід, який особливо полюбили наші бійці 🔥 До речі, цікавий факт 💡 свою назву “Вампір” отримав не просто так: головна його перевага — застосування при суцільній темряві. Він “бачить“ замасковану техніку, бліндажі та живу силу ворога так само чітко, як у день 😎 Це перша частина наших відео з роботою “вампірів”. Продовження незабаром!
🔥30❤6
Наші бійці під час втечі від FPV звернули в хащі, які спершу здалися безпечним місцем, але побачили там підбитий квадроцикл. Ці кадри вкотре нагадують: на фронті небезпека чатує скрізь!
🙏24❤5🤔1😢1
Перша зустріч із командиром після БЗВП 😁
😁16👍8
Суші та шаурма на позиціях – не очікували такого? Шаурму, до речі, передавали дроном 😋
👍29❤13🤗8
Навіки в строю! Під час захисту України загинув наш побратим Роман "Рон" Голубовський. Після окупації рідної Луганщини Рон переїхав до Києва. Працював веб-розробником. Мріяв про звільнення рідного дому. У підрозділі Рон виконував місії в складі екіпажу важкого дрона-бомбардувальника. Побратими згадують його як надійного товариша та людину великого серця. "Рон бився як лев, загинув як чоловік", — наголошує командир…
💔30😭20🫡12🙏5
Вибуховий привіт усім, хто прийшов на нашу землю зі злими намірами 💥
👍19🔥18🥰4❤3
"Забор" долучився до Сил оборони у серпні 2023 року за покликом серця. Відтоді виконував операції спеціального призначення на складних ділянках фронту, а не так давно вирішив долучитися до команди "Чорного Рою". За словами "Забора", обрати 2 ББпС 1 ТрО ім. Івана Богуна йому порадив знайомий, який служить у підрозділі й добре відгукувався про атмосферу в колективі та керівництво. 🔸 Долучайся до "Чорного Рою", заповни…
❤22🫡9
У мережі можна натрапити на кадри, як росіяни заради веселощів та забави вбивають на окупованих територіях коней. Ми ж навпаки рятуємо навіть диких тварин, які потрапляють в антидронові сітки. А втім, якби не окупанти, то ця бідолашна тварина взагалі б не опинилася у сітці 🦌
❤22👍22
2 ББпС «Чорний рій» pinned a photo
"Чорний Рій" (2 ББпС 1 обр ТРО) шукає тих, хто хоче бути корисним країні та готовий відповідально й наполегливо працювати заради перемоги. Ми шукаємо: 🔸 пілотів БпЛА 🔸 саперів 🔸 інженерів-механіків 🔸 діловодів 🔸 водіїв 🔸 зв'язківців Неважливо, чи маєте ви військовий досвід — ми всьому навчимо. Бо на нашу думку, головна зброя воїна — розум, і що без технологій неможливо досягти успіху в сучасній війні. Ми також го…
❤16🔥5
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @chornyriy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 26,371 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“2 ББпС «Чорний рій»” (@chornyriy), 638 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chornyriy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.