Channel
@choosetothinq
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
242subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001423476282 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @choosetothinq |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/choosetothinq |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 20:25 | 242 | -1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 11:54 | 243 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:46 | 244 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:35 | 244 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 11 February 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 March 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
8 reactions across 4 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 5 | 62.5% | |
| ❤ | 3 | 37.5% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 February 2022 to 17 March 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#ThursdayTrial #DailyReader A great read from a later season of the Daily Reader Compound! 🔖 Meet the unofficial Poet Laureate of Twitter (from 2016) How I accidentally became a poet through Twitter 🔗 https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-37319526 (1875 words) Liked this sample? Feed your curiosity habit by reading regularly - Join CTQ's Daily Reader Compound to get interesting articles like this every day.
❤3👍2
#WiseWednesday #CTQreads #uplevel Don’t stay fixated on the problem you’re trying to solve. Be open to improvisation and creative solutions, even if you don’t know what the outcome will be. -A lesson from noted novelist Sarah Stein Greenberg, from ‘Creative Acts for Curious People’ (Attached is an excerpt from the Blinkist book summary)
#MindMonday #uplevel Today’s recommendation is a CTQ Smartcast about no-code with Max Haining- the founder of 100DaysOfNoCode. Watch as Harish engages Max in a conversation about no-code, its trends and how building a community can help one learn something better. Watch it here: https://www.choosetothinq.com/blog/2021/9/30/ctq-smartcast-how-should-you-think-about-nocode-with-max-haining Prefer the audio version? S…
👍1
#SundayStories #uplevel Happy Now > Happier Later Humans prefer being happy in the short-term even if it means forgoing greater happiness in the long-term. Psychiatrist George Ainslie discovered that given the choice, people tend to accept smaller rewards immediately rather than wait for bigger rewards in the future. In an experiment, when offered the option between getting $50 now and waiting 5 years for $100, the…
#SaturdaySteal #DailyReaderMini Want to be a Daily Reader but not sure if it's for you? Try it out first by taking the 50-Day Reading Challenge! Check out the mini version of the Daily Reader Compound here: https://www.ctqcompounds.com/daily-reader-mini You can get Rs.1000/- off on your subscription with the special promo code READERS
👍1
#FreshFriday Latest from CTQ Read 🔖 [Blog Post] How Companies In Different Domains Benefit From A Culture Strategy Watch 🎞 [Smart Lever] Ep 41 - Culture Manifesto Prefer audio versions? Listen to CTQ Smartcasts and Smart Levers on your favourite podcast platform. ✨ Want to add more skills and knowledge to your arsenal that can help you remain relevant in an uncertain future? Check out the FutureStack compound …
#MindMonday #uplevel In today’s recommended Smart Levers episode, Harish and Ramanad talk about the danger of attributing someone’s behaviour to their personality rather than their situation. Watch here: https://www.choosetothinq.com/blog/ctq-smart-levers-fundamental-attribution-error Smart Levers are ideas, frameworks, and models that help you systematically uplevel in work and life, and thus become future relevant…
#FreshFriday Latest from CTQ Read 🔖 Incite Your Month: March 2022 🔖 [Blog Post] 5 Secret Places Which Can Help You Uplevel Your Company Culture In A Hybrid World Watch 🎞 [Smart Lever] Ep 40 - Objectives And Key Results Watch 🎞 [Smartcast] Lessons In Managing And Accelerating An Organization's People Ecosystem, With Krish Shankar Prefer audio versions? Listen to CTQ Smartcasts and Smart Levers on your favou…
#ThursdayTrial #FutureStack On the theme of 'How to Think About the Future', here's an article from the FutureStack Compound: 🔖 Oracles and models: ancient and modern ways of telling the future 🔗https://theconversation.com/oracles-and-models-ancient-and-modern-ways-of-telling-the-future-90124 (1005 words) Found this insightful? Dive deeper and get introduced to 26 timeless skills and future trends to strengthen y…
#ThinkingTuesday #Reflection #PauseAtYellow Misunderstandings are painful and hard to resolve. Communicating well is one way to avoid or get past such misunderstandings. What would you have done differently if you could change the past with the wisdom you have today? P@Y questions help you pause and reflect, making you a better reflective thinker. Join the free Telegram channel to practice the art of deliberate ref…
Photo, posted without a caption
#SundayStories #uplevel Cut Your Losses Humans are innately loss-averse. We have a tendency to continue investing in things because of what they’ve already cost us. But this might be damaging. Take the example of the epic failure of the Concorde jet. Despite knowing that Concorde would never recover all of its money, the French and British governments continued to invest in this unprofitable venture for 4 decades.…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @choosetothinq. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Choose To Thinq” (@choosetothinq), 242 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/choosetothinq.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.