Channel
@cholerisha
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
313subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003137867286 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cholerisha |
| Description | оформление канала в разработке ЩИТПОСТ: https://t.me/+ic3GaQ11EcxlOWEy |
| Created | 7 October 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cholerisha |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:35 | 313 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:08 | 313 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 7 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 8 (7 October 2025 – 28 July 2026) |
| Views total | 274 |
| Reactions total | 54 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 07:35 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
654 reactions across 7 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5400163690949413971 | 246 | 37.6% | |
| custom 5395353834384034266 | 110 | 16.8% | |
| custom 5395820980796951373 | 104 | 15.9% | |
| custom 5393369718407079329 | 45 | 6.88% | |
| custom 5395841012524418786 | 45 | 6.88% | |
| custom 5395622372919252176 | 35 | 5.35% | |
| custom 5393489921656785803 | 32 | 4.89% | |
| custom 5395711085468750271 | 19 | 2.91% | |
| custom 5395763651573486180 | 18 | 2.75% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 654reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 7 October 2025 to 28 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @cholerisha. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 8 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 October 2025 to 28 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
. ₊ ⊹ . С днём рождения меня!!~ 🐡🦋 А лучший подарок для артера - репост его картинок ✨ Всем по тортику! 🎂
custom 539582098079695137331custom 539535383438403426610custom 53957110854687502715custom 53934899216567858033custom 53957636515734861802custom 54001636909494139712custom 53958410125244187861
. ₊ ⊹ . Осторожно, тюлень в коробке! ✨🤩
custom 540016369094941397162custom 539348992165678580318custom 539582098079695137315custom 53953538343840342664custom 53956223729192521764custom 53958410125244187862
ноутбук отправился туда же, куда и планшет, поэтому выживаю, как могу 🌸🌸
custom 539535383438403426653custom 539576365157348618013custom 540016369094941397112custom 53957110854687502713custom 53958209807969513733
‧˚꒰🍷꒱༘‧—
custom 540016369094941397157custom 539535383438403426625custom 539562237291925217620custom 53934899216567858033custom 53958209807969513733custom 53957110854687502712
. ₊ ⊹ . Я сломала планшет ☺️
custom 539582098079695137349custom 539535383438403426617custom 53957110854687502719custom 53934899216567858034custom 53956223729192521764custom 53958410125244187862
. ₊ ⊹ . Доделала референс своей ОС, знакомьтесь 🤪
custom 540016369094941397173custom 539336971840707932931custom 539584101252441878620custom 53934899216567858033custom 53956223729192521763custom 53957636515734861803custom 53953538343840342661
. ₊ ⊹ . Угадайте кто.. . ≽^-⩊-^≼
custom 540016369094941397140custom 539584101252441878620custom 539336971840707932914custom 53956223729192521764custom 53958209807969513733custom 53934899216567858031
Channel created
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @cholerisha. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 318,042 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“cholerisha” (@cholerisha), 313 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cholerisha.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.