Channel
@chocolateglazed
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
16subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002305287038 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @chocolateglazed |
| Created | 5 July 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 2 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 2 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/chocolateglazed |
Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 1 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2 Oct 2026, 06:00 | 16 | -1 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 20:38 | 17 | -1 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 01:35 | 18 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 16:47 | 19 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:07 | 19 | first reading |
3 posts held, back to 5 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 3 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 July 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
⊛ Selling 150+ OG/3 character Discord usernames ⁃ BIGGEST list in com ↠ @smothers, @criminology, @fjj, @a5s, @_a*, @yungbans 100+ more! [Full List] ⁃ All come with OGE, never sold before ⊛ Nitro Gift Link / 1 Month - 3 Month Server Boosts ⁃ Inquire about them. ⊛ ROBUX! ⁃ Clean, legitimately earned, and been selling for 8+ years! - [Prices] ⊛ LOOK AT MY SHOP Contact: @lousily Channel: @d1shit
★ Bringing you the most reliable services & usernames.
Channel created
Showing the 3 most recent of 3 posts we hold for @chocolateglazed. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@chocolateglazed named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“d1 PORTAL” (@chocolateglazed), 16 subscribers as measured 2 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chocolateglazed.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.