2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 123–125 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
9 Aug 2026, 03:00
124
no change
7 Aug 2026, 03:00
124
first reading
Engagement
13 posts held, back to 11 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
54.0%
avg views ÷ 124 subscribers
Avg views / post
67.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
17.9%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 13 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 July 2026
Posts held
13 (11 May 2026 – 22 July 2026)
Views total
67
Reactions total
12
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
9 Aug 2026, 03:00 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
261
Videos
34
Links
128
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
29s
Average length
15s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
95 reactions across 11 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5244514535703851714
35
36.8%
❤🔥
24
25.3%
custom 5249484362621141855
19
20.0%
custom 5278321868263144498
16
16.8%
custom 5363983084016377517
1
1.05%
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 95reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 11 May 2026 to 22 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
36 сырков за один раз. А вам слабо?
Именно из таких живых историй складывается книга Бориса Александрова.
Это история о создании бренда, предпринимательстве, смелости начинать заново, высоких стандартах и стремлении делать лучше, чем принято.
А после прочтения мы отправимся на завод, чтобы увидеть, как создают тот самый сырок от начала до конца.
Мы сделали 36 сырков и положили их в холодильник, чтобы на следующий…
КНИГА МЕСЯЦА
В этом месяце читаем «Сырок: история моей жизни и бизнеса» Б.Ю. Александров
Встреча пройдет 15 августа (суббота) днем
В этот раз мы предлагаем отправиться на экскурсию на тот самый завод сырков Б.Ю. Александров в г. о. Пушкинский 😎
Как принять участие в клубе:
✨ Зарегистрируйтесь на встречу в боте @ChoBooks_bot — внимательно изучи все детали и внеси оплату
✨ 15 августа встречаемся на Ярославском вокз…
🪐 На июльском книжном клубе обсудили «Автостопом по Галактике» Дугласа Адамса.
Пофантазировали о путешествиях по бескрайним просторам Вселенной, поразмышляли о смысле и абсурде жизни и обсудили, почему не на каждый вопрос обязательно искать ответ.
По итогам обсуждения книга получила от нашего книжного клуба 3,5 балла. Но здесь есть важный нюанс: первая, одноименная часть понравилась нам заметно больше и вполне могл…
Автор книги «Автостопом по Галактике», британский писатель Дуглас Адамс был необычным человеком. На другие планеты он, конечно, не летал, но идея написания книги возникла как раз во время путешествия автостопом.
🧳Сначала это была не книга. Впервые путеводитель появился в 1978 году как радиокомедия, и только после успеха постановки Адамс переработал ее в роман.
🧳Дуглас работал над сериалом «Доктор Кто» в качестве сц…
МИФУ 21
Друзья, издательство МИФ празднует день рождения! Это отличный повод затариться книжками со скидкой 50 % 😝
Сайт издательства
OZON
WB
Не забывайте зарегистрироваться на встречу Клуба для обсуждения книги «Автостопом по Галактике».
ВСТРЕЧА МЕСЯЦА
Для обсуждения книги "Автостопом по Галактике" Дугласа Адамса встречаемся в пятницу, 10 июля в 19:00
Чтобы принять участие во встрече — зарегистрируйся по ссылке.
Ждем вас 📒
КНИГА МЕСЯЦА
В июне читаем юмористический научно-фантастический роман «Автостопом по Галактике»английского писателя Дугласа Адамса.
Идея книги возникла у Адамса в австрийском Инсбруке во время путешествия автостопом из Лондона в Стамбул. Лежа ночью в поле и глядя на звезды, он придумал создать путеводитель для космических путешественников. Первоначально история воплотилась в виде радиопостановки для BBC Radio, прем…
Предлагаем выбрать книгу месяца 📒
Встреча пройдет 10 июля в 19:00
🌿«Автостопом по Галактике» Дуглас Адамс
Бессмертная фантастика. Землю сносят для постройки межгалактической трассы, а единственный выживший путешествует с инопланетянином-социологом. Для тех, кто любит юмор, иронию и лёгкий хаос.
🌿«Доверие» Эрнан Диаз
Интеллектуальная головоломка, Пулитцеровский лауреат. История финансового магната 1920-х рассказана…
🌹В начале лета собрались на обсуждение «Маленьких женщин» Луизы Мэй Олкотт.
Книга вызвала противоречивые эмоции. Пришли ко мнению, что в свое время она была действительно открытием, заявлением о свободе мысли женщины и новым витком на тему воспитания, благодетели и семейных ценностей. Сейчас же роман видится иначе и больше нацелен на юного читателя.
Многим не хватило живости действия, той самой интриги, ради которо…
Давайте узнаем немного больше об авторе книги месяца — Луизе Мэй Олкотт.
🤩Американская писательница родилась 29 ноября 1832 года и была второй из четырех сестер. Семья была бедной, поэтому с юных лет девушка начала работать.
🤩С детства увлекалась литературой: писала рассказы, сказки, пьесы для домашнего театра. В 22 года Луиза написала свою первую книгу «Басни о цветах».
🤩Во время Гражданской войны служила медсест…
КНИГА МЕСЯЦА
В этом месяце мы совместными усилиями выбрали роман «Маленькие женщины» Луизы Мэй Олкотт.
Приглашаем всех вместе погрузиться в историю семейства Марч, покорившую мир. Книга была переведена более чем на 50 языков и положена в основу шести фильмов, четырех телесериалов, нескольких опер и спектаклей!
🤩Для обсуждения встречаемся 6 июня (сб) в 13:00. Регистрация доступна по ссылке.
До встречи! 📖
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @cho_books. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 122%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 11 May 2026 to 22 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 913,820 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Книжный клуб ЧО!” (@cho_books), 124 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cho_books.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
