因为针对 PM Bot 的 Spam 一天比一天多,而且压根没人用那东西找我,于是决定换成频道的 Direct Messages(如果你的账号被限制双向私聊的话) 虽然改变不了没人找我的事实
custom 63253096623715143432
Signed 池塘

Channel
@chitang233_channel
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
563subscribers
-10 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001797465051 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @chitang233_channel |
| Created | Between 1 January 2022 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/chitang233_channel |
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 64% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 15:19 | 563 | -3 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 17:39 | 566 | -4 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 01:02 | 570 | -1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 08:12 | 571 | -1 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 18:45 | 572 | -1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:46 | 573 | no change |
| 13 Aug 2026, 21:33 | 573 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 12 February 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
72 reactions across 9 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤣 | 27 | 37.5% | |
| custom 6325309662371514343 | 24 | 33.3% | |
| ❤ | 10 | 13.9% | |
| 👀 | 8 | 11.1% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 1.39% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 1.39% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 1.39% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 72 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 12 February 2025 to 1 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
因为针对 PM Bot 的 Spam 一天比一天多,而且压根没人用那东西找我,于是决定换成频道的 Direct Messages(如果你的账号被限制双向私聊的话) 虽然改变不了没人找我的事实
custom 63253096623715143432
Signed 池塘
Posted without readable text
❤3
https://t.me/addemoji/nerdfonts 从 nerd fonts 里挑了点可能会用到的做了 adaptive emoji pack 如果有你需要用到但是里面没有的可以找我加进去,前提是我在线而且很闲 使用 Revincx/ttf2tgs 进行处理
Signed 池塘
新的公式化圣经 在 X 上搜索还能看到最新二创
🤣21custom 632530966237151434311😁1
Signed 池塘
最近(大概吧)GitHub 支持了 Google OAuth,于是我们现在可以用 Google 账号登录微软账号了
custom 632530966237151434310❤1🔥1
Signed 池塘
闲得无聊发现 IQOO Global 官网的参数是 Parameter (P1),而且 URL (https://www.iqoo.com/en/products/param/iqoo-13) 里的路径居然也是 param,这到底是谁想出来的翻译 另外小米台湾官网页脚处的语言切换模板文字没改,写的是 English name / Local name (P2),作为对比他们的日本官网写的是 日本 / 日本語 (P3) 性价比的卧龙凤雏
❤4
Signed 池塘
有病吧整这么大狗屎图标 底下又是好的
Signed 池塘
File, posted without a caption
Signed 池塘
https://github.com/RyogiMutsuki/Noki 解决了 WebAuthn NFC 会卡在 “大功告成” 阶段而无法正确完成认证的问题 需要 LSPosed 框架,启用模块后执行 killall com.android.nfc 或重启即可 已在 venus, marble, munch 上测试过,另外发现小米早就给 dada 修好了但并未下放给哪怕 houji,不用提更老的设备了 欢迎提交测试反馈
Signed 池塘
这他妈什么东西
👀8❤2
Signed 池塘
请大家看 PWM 充电
custom 63253096623715143431
Signed 池塘
写出这个页面的人应该死刑 不是 App 问题,所有用原生指纹接口的都长这样,更新完 HyperOS 2 之后就糊了,之前还是好的
Signed 池塘
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @chitang233_channel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“池塘的踢寄空间” (@chitang233_channel), 563 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chitang233_channel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.