Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Chimpost NMS

@chimpostnms

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

704subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002596916144
TypeChannel
Username@chimpostnms
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/chimpostnms

Growth

7047 Aug 2026, 10:47 — 704 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 08:18 — 704 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 10:478 Aug 2026, 08:18
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 703–705 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 08:18704no change
7 Aug 2026, 10:47704first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 3 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.3%
avg views ÷ 704 subscribers
Avg views / post
86.5
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
2
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 July 2026
Posts held20 (3 June 202627 July 2026)
Views total173
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 10:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

27 Jul 2026, 19:08 UTC74 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @dao_nmsPhoto

Знакомый открыл канал Бтк 66к, появляется все больше активностей, пришло время возвращать хорошее инфополе https://t.me/+N3lRG-VZvtpiZGIy

Signed Dm

18 Jul 2026, 12:45 UTC99 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @dao_nmsPhoto

BTC supply in loss crossed 50% on June 5. That's 42 days ago. Every time this exact thing happened before, 2011, 2018, 2022, bitcoin found its bottom within 31 days of crossing that line. Every single time. We just blew past that window. This is already the second-longest stretch on record before a bottom finally printed, and K33's own data says the real range runs 13 to 101 days, usually with one more flush of 15-

Signed Dm

2 Jul 2026, 21:49 UTC135 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @dao_nms

И дайте бустов, чо вы ✍🏿 https://t.me/boost/dao_nms

Signed Dm

2 Jul 2026, 21:46 UTC113 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @dao_nmsPhoto

Откуда столько времени ? • Собрал тулзу, которая сама живёт в X 24/7: парсит, скорит, находит новых инфлюенсеров через social graph. Работает без меня — просто отдаёт готовые паттерны: что залетает, что AI-слоп, кто реально двигает рынок. • Отдельно вшил трекинг своих акков - система сама смотрит что зашло, что нет, и тащит это в следующие посты. Раньше на разбор уходило по несколько часов в день, сейчас 5-10 мин

Signed Dm

2 Jul 2026, 21:16 UTC96 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @dao_nmsPhoto

набираем обороты потихоньку

Signed Dm

15 Jun 2026, 14:08 UTC122 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @dao_nms

@GPTSubsBot Оплата рублями / криптой Лучшее место для покупки подписок GPT / Claude / Галочек в Твиттере Если не хотите париться с еу картами, и быть уверенными в продукте Беру тут гпт и Клод, галку в другом месте, но энивей, вдруг кому то будет полезно

Signed Dm

11 Jun 2026, 23:03 UTC162 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @dao_nmsPhoto

IPO SpaceX • 4,400 человек могут стать долларовыми миллионерами уже завтра. • Аллокацию выдавали не только инженерам, но и техникам, сварщикам, вообще всему стафу. • И это натолкнуло меня на мысль: эти люди работали годами, чтобы получить свою долю, но большинство потом просто назовёт их «удачниками», закрыв глаза на весь их путь и многолетний труд. Наверное, одна из самых важных вещей в жизни, вовремя понять, чт

Signed Dm

9 Jun 2026, 19:04 UTC152 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @crypto_ministerPhoto

chat gpt: напиши другими словами но сохрани смысл

Signed Dm

8 Jun 2026, 21:05 UTC139 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @dao_nmsPhoto

• Похоже, дно уже поставили. Или совсем рядом. Страха за последние недели вылили с запасом - люди резали позиции, ныли в чатах, закрывали всё подряд. Классика перед разворотом. • Тем временем Сейлор тихо докупил 1 550 BTC примерно за $101M, средняя около $65k. • Для контекста: буквально недавно Strategy продала 32 BTC, а сейчас взяла почти в 48 раз больше - и дешевле. На балансе уже 845k+ BTC. Это ставка, которую

Signed Dm

6 Jun 2026, 21:05 UTC150 viewsread 7 August 2026

Опаааа споты дали в хороший проектик

Signed Dm

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @chimpostnms. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

5 Jun 2026, 15:09 UTCAnonymous Poll57 voters

✍🏿

  1. GPT33%
  2. Claude70%
  3. Grok16%

The shares total 119%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 June 2026 to 27 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 817,873 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Chimpost NMS” (@chimpostnms), 704 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chimpostnms.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.