3 measurements spanning 8 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 104–105 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Aug 2026, 12:59
104
-1
9 Aug 2026, 08:47
105
no change
7 Aug 2026, 10:14
105
first reading
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 17 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
36s
Average length
12s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
427 reactions across 16 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤🔥
79
18.5%
🔥
79
18.5%
❤
75
17.6%
👍
50
11.7%
💯
43
10.1%
🥰
43
10.1%
🤩
29
6.79%
⚡
14
3.28%
🆒
6
1.41%
😱
3
0.703%
🏆
2
0.468%
👨💻
2
0.468%
👏
1
0.234%
🙊
1
0.234%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 427reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 17 October 2025 to 1 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
39
across the posts below
Posts paid on
12
of 17 we hold a reading for · 71%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @chilinoshdesign. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 October 2025 to 1 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
💥 Время идёт, а эмоции не отпускают! Небольшим атмосферным видео с "Воздуха Карелии" поделился с нами зритель Дмитрий Толостошеев из Москвы. Спасибо за тёплые воспоминания и точно пойманное настроение!
✅ Хотите попасть в ленту нашей группы? Снимайте свои видео, отмечайте сообщество фестиваля соавтором - лучшие работы обязательно опубликуем.
👻 А если хочется забрать с собой частичку "Воздуха" - загляните в обновлённ…
Короче, полгода без Фигмы и фотошопа - это жестко. Сказать, что скучаю - ничего не сказать 💔
Армия пришла, так что лайфстайл максимально сменился. Но дизайнера внутри просто так не выключишь. Руки чесались нереально, так что я и тут умудрился ворваться в дело - пилил парням макеты флагов.
Угадайте, какой был гонорар? Чокопай! 🍫
И честно, это была самая кайфовая оплата за ТЗ в моей жизни. Та самая зарплата если бы …
Второй увал проходит в Петрозаводске🫡
и я поймал себя на мысли, что в этот маленький и уютный город влюбляешься как-то незаметно. Тут нет столичной суеты, зато есть бесконечная Онега, свежий северный ветер и улицы, по которым хочется просто идти, никуда не торопясь.
- Знаете, есть места, где чувствуешь себя «в своей тарелке» почти сразу. Для меня Петрозаводск стал именно таким «портом спокойствия». Выпить кофе на н…
Спор на 24 часа: Мы бросили вызов самим себе - создать продающую карточку товара для портативного шейвера с дедлайном всего 1 день. Теперь пришло время решить, кто справился лучше!🧔♂️
Какой дизайн, по вашему мнению, лучше продаст этот шейвер на маркетплейсе?🪒
Голосуйте и делитесь, почему вы выбрали именно этот вариант! ⬇️
Dmitriy Tolstosheev (CHILINOSH)
Идея: Создать прямой и агрессивный визуал, который мгновенно убедит мужчину в мощности и надёжности устройства. Яркий цвет, крупные цифры - чтобы покупка была быстрой и честной.
Как думаете, удалось ли нам дать покупателю "быструю, честную и мощную причину" выбрать именно этот шейвер?
👉 Скоро будет голосование за лучшую карточку!
Карточка Oleg Petrov (MXDNXGHT)
Идея: Передать ощущение железной надёжности и брутальности, чтобы товар выглядел так, будто он способен выдержать всё💪
Считаете, получилось передать эту мощь? Оцените работу:
👉 Скоро будет голосование за лучшую карточку!
🎉 Эй, дизайнеры и сочувствующие! 🎉
Пришло время для настоящего поединка!
🥊 Мы с MlXlDNlXlGHT объявляем конкурс на
ЛУЧШУЮ КАРТОЧКУ ТОВАРА!
Наш товар-герой: стильный, брутальный мужской шейвер
🔥 Задача: Создать такую карточку, чтобы покупатель не смог пройти мимо!
Чтобы она была не просто красивой, а продающей!
Срок у нас очень сжатый, чтобы держать всех в тонусе:
ДЕДЛАЙН: ВСЕГО 1 ДЕНЬ! ⏳
Надевайте боевые перчатк…
Привет, дорогие! ❤️
В преддверии Нового года самое ценное – это тепло, которым мы можем поделиться, и волшебство, созданное своими руками. ✨
Мы приглашаем вас в наш уютный уголок для участия в самой тёплой и искренней традиции – игре "Тайный Санта"! 🎅🎁
Чтобы сохранить по-настоящему душевную и камерную атмосферу, где каждый подарок наполнен вниманием, количество участников строго ограничено. ⏳ Мы ждём тех, кто гото…
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @chilinoshdesign. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 17 October 2025 to 1 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@chilinoshdesign named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@dedmoroz26y named in 1 post, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“chilinosh | Дизайнер” (@chilinoshdesign), 104 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chilinoshdesign.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
