یک جمله برای نجات مکالمه! 🛟 وقتی نمیدونی چی بگی: What about you? مثلاً: I work in a hospital. What about you? 🎯 این جمله ساده باعث میشه مکالمه ادامه پیدا کنه. 💫 Chi Chat | EnglishTalk Show @chichatshow
❤2

Channel
@chichatshow
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
83subscribers
+11 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003761475519 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @chichatshow |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| On Telegram | t.me/chichatshow |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 17:32 | 83 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:05 | 83 | +11 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:16 | 72 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 19 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (6 August 2026 – 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | 489 |
| Reactions total | 42 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 17:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
42 reactions across 19 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 85.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 36 | 85.7% | |
| 🔥 | 6 | 14.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 42reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
یک جمله برای نجات مکالمه! 🛟 وقتی نمیدونی چی بگی: What about you? مثلاً: I work in a hospital. What about you? 🎯 این جمله ساده باعث میشه مکالمه ادامه پیدا کنه. 💫 Chi Chat | EnglishTalk Show @chichatshow
❤2
Chi Chat Talk Show @chichatshow بیاین با هم یه نگاه سریع و کاربردی به یکی از جذابترین بخشهای یادگیری زبان بندازیم! 🇬🇧🇺🇸 🌟 Vocabulary Challenge: British vs. American English همهی ما میدونیم که تفاوتهای واژگانی بین انگلیسی بریتانیایی و آمریکایی زیاده. توی این پست، چند تا از مهمترین و پرکاربردترینها رو با هم مقایسه کردیم: Elevator (US) 🇺🇸 🆚 Lift (UK) 🇬🇧 Apartment (US) 🇺🇸 🆚 Flat (UK) 🇬🇧 Cookie (US) 🇺🇸 🆚 …
❤2
Chi Chat Talk Show @chichatshow ☀️ صبح بخیر! امروز رو با یه کلمهی فوقالعاده کاربردی شروع کنیم که متأسفانه زیاد شنیده میشه... 👻 🌟 Slang of the Day #Slang #Idiom #Chi Chat #Ghosting #LanguageLearning 💬 "Ghosting" (Ghost-ing) 🇮🇷 (غیب شدن، جواب ندادن ناگهانی به پیامها) ✨ یادت باشه: یادگیری اصطلاحات به شما کمک میکنه تا مثل یک نیتیو صحبت کنید و متوجه مکالمات واقعی بشید. 📝 Example in a sentence: "I thought we had a …
❤2
☕️ English is not just a subject. It’s a conversation. چند ساله انگلیسی میخونی، گرامر یاد میگیری، لغت حفظ میکنی… اما وقتی نوبت به صحبت کردن میرسه، هنوز مکث میکنی؟ 👀 شاید مشکل از انگلیسی تو نیست. شاید فقط به یک فضای درست برای حرف زدن نیاز داری. اینجا CHI CHATـه. 🎙️ جایی که قراره دور هم جمع بشیم، درباره موضوعات مختلف واقعاً صحبت کنیم، آدمهای جدید بشناسیم، بخندیم و در کنار هم انگلیسی رو کاربردیتر یاد بگیریم. 💬 Re…
🔥2
When she was just a girl, she expected the world But it flew away from her reach So she ran away in her sleep and dreamed of Para-para-paradise, para-para-paradise, para-para-paradise Every time she closed her eyes When she was just a girl, she expected the world But it flew away from her reach and the bullets catch in her teeth Life goes on, it gets so heavy The wheel breaks the butterfly, every tear a waterfall In …
❤2
Chi Chat | EnglishTalk Show 💫 @chichatshow
❤2
وقتی چیزی رو نمیفهمی، فقط نگو What? 😅 بهجاش بگو: ✅ Sorry, I didn't catch that. ✅ Could you say that again? ✅ What do you mean by that? 🎯 این جملهها خیلی طبیعیتر و مؤدبانهترن. 💫 Chi Chat | English Talk Show @chichatshow
❤2
"Why are you learning English?"
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Chi Chat Talk Show @chichatshow ☀️ صبح بخیر! بیاین صبجمون رو با این جملهی انگیزشی فوقالعاده شروع کنیم... 🌱 🌟 Motivation of the Day #Motivation #Mindset #ChiChat 💬 "The expert in anything was once a beginner." 🇮🇷 (هر متخصصی در هر زمینهای، زمانی یک مبتدی بوده است.) ✨ یادت باشه: هیچکس از روز اول عالی نبوده! از اشتباه کردن نترس، قدم اول رو بردار و به مسیرت ادامه بده. 💪 💬 What is a skill you are working on right …
❤3
What is this about? You never really want to Used to talk it out But now you call the lawyer Don't tell me that you thought You'd always get far without my help I'm sorry I can't fall Off the rooftop of your heart anymore You're making me start over Like strangers in the dark I'll keep my self-composure I'm falling all apart I'm staring at the reaper While trying to save a face Hysterical deceiver While I've been sec…
❤3
Chi Chat | EnglishTalk Show 💫 @chichatshow
❤3
Chi Chat Talk Show @chichatshow ☀️ سلام! روزتون بخیر. بیاین امروز دایره واژگانون رو یه لول ببریم بالاتر... 💡 Word Power: Don't just say "Happy"! #Vocabulary #WordPower #SmartEnglish به جای استفاده مداوم از کلمه تکراری Happy، این ۴ جایگزین پرکاربرد و حرفهای رو به خاطرت بسپار: 😊 1. Cheerful 🇮🇷 معنی: شاد و سرحال 🤝 2. Delighted 🇮🇷 معنی: بسیار خوشحال و راضی 🎉 3. Thrilled 🇮🇷 معنی: هیجانزده و ذوقزده 😌 4. Content 🇮…
❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @chichatshow. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
"Why are you learning English?"
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 9 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 343,610 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Chi Chat | English Talk Show” (@chichatshow), 83 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chichatshow.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.