Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Чибичик и интерфейсы

@chibichik

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,554subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001276542341
TypeChannel
Username@chibichik
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/chibichik

Growth

1,5511,5541,552.56 August 2026 — 1,551 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,551 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,552 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,554 subscribers6 August 202610 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 4 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,551–1,554 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 07:301,554+2
7 Aug 2026, 03:241,552+1
6 Aug 2026, 07:341,551no change
6 Aug 2026, 07:181,551first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 1 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
34.4%
avg views ÷ 1,554 subscribers
Avg views / post
535
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.52%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held17 (1 July 20265 August 2026)
Views total5,880
Reactions total266
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 18:07 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

381 reactions across 17 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52763136016850702099524.9%
❤‍🔥6015.7%
custom 52760029338156466454712.3%
🤩3910.2%
😱246.30%
😢236.04%
👍225.77%
😁225.77%
💘205.25%
custom 527645447231741076892.36%
💯61.57%
🎉51.31%
🤯30.787%
🍾20.525%
🤝20.525%
👎10.262%
😭10.262%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 381reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 1 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
8
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 17 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
8
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @chibichik. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 12:07 UTC264 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Цикличность ожиданий от кандидатов Постоянный вопрос, который затрагиваю на консультациях со студентами, кто сейчас в поиске работы или только входит в дизайн индустрию касается ожиданий от кандидатов и хотелось бы подсветить как меняются реалии рынка и почему тренд качнулся от UX к UI Когда я начианала свой путь в дизайне, толкьо появлялся тренд на исследования, работу с метриками и плотную связку дизайна и бизнес

❤‍🔥9💯2custom 52760029338156466452custom 52763136016850702091

4 Aug 2026, 05:33 UTC345 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Сегодня моя дизайн-директор будет вещать на сууупер крутую и интересную тему 😭💗 Хвастаюсь вообщем

❤‍🔥5custom 52760029338156466455custom 52763136016850702095

4 Aug 2026, 05:33 UTC328 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @girls_dsgnPhoto

Как вырасти из исполнителя в дизайн-директора? Об этом расскажет Катя, дизайн-директор в РСХБ. Поговорим T-shape развитии в двух направлениях: 1️⃣ О глубоком понимании бизнеса, аналитике и исследованиях, которые позволяют защищать решения цифрами и говорить с топ-менеджментом на одном языке. 2️⃣ О том, как постоянно расширять инструментарий: сильный руководитель вырастает из универсального специалиста. 4 августа,

custom 52763136016850702097👍6custom 52760029338156466455

3 Aug 2026, 10:26 UTC411 views31 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Мне надоело работать дома, теперь я скитаюсь Знакомые не из айти сферы всегда завидовали мне, да мне и самой нравилось работать дома: просыпаешься когда хочешь, тратишь меньше времени и денег, не паришься как выглядеть и всё в этом духе Однако, недавно я словила себя на мысли, что мне это стало доставлять больше проблем: 😶Нет разделения работы и личной жизни. Я просто вставала, начинала работать и потом ложилась с

custom 527631360168507020917👍5custom 52760029338156466455❤‍🔥2💯1🤝1

29 Jul 2026, 02:19 UTC483 views4 reactions8 Starsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @girls_dsgnPhoto

Третий поток «Дизайним как девчонки», август 🌸 Лето — идеальное время, чтобы заложить фундамент для осеннего рывка в карьере. Мы открываем набор и будем обмениваться поддержкой, строить планы и создавать пространство, где не страшно развиваться В августе фокусируемся на UI: разберём, как делать сильные интерфейсы и убедительное портфолио. Поговорим про визуал, сетки, типографику, работу с цветом, как показывать сво

custom 52763136016850702093custom 52760029338156466451

22 Jul 2026, 17:00 UTC715 views39 reactionsread 7 August 2026

От найма до самостоятельности: как я ращу своего первого стажера У меня никогда не было мысли «проще сделать самой, чем объяснить» поскольку я уже несколько лет веду менторскую деятельность, но одно дело менторить ребят со стороны, и совсем другое ощущение взять человека в команду с нуля Делегировать страшно. Отдавать свои задачи человеку без опыта — страшно вдвойне Недавно в РСХБ мне дали возможность провести пол

🤩21custom 52760029338156466459🎉5❤‍🔥2🍾2

21 Jul 2026, 12:06 UTC651 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🤩9custom 52763136016850702098❤‍🔥5

21 Jul 2026, 12:05 UTC609 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Хотела уже давненько поделиться с вами, что я люблю экстрим больная на голову В прошлом месяце купили эндуро мотоциклы, супер спонтанно и при условии что я вообще не ездила на таком ни разу! Да что уж говорить, я даже не велосипеде особо ездить не умею На выходных вот выбирались потихоньку училась, а на второй раз вообще поехали за 70 км от дома и я сломала всё что можно (хорошо хоть не себя) Упала – оторвала торм

😱11custom 52763136016850702096🤩2custom 52764544723174107681

20 Jul 2026, 18:32 UTC617 views29 reactionsread 7 August 2026

ИПР по ОКР или как не выгореть когда развиваешься в чем-то в 2026 Идеальный пост мотивация для понедельника и пожалуй самая лучшая стратегия по профессиональному развитию, которую я нашла для себя и своих студентов – это составлять ИПР по методике ОКР Хочу поделиться с вами, вдруг вы ещё не знаете, а вы делитесь своими методами достижения целей в комментарии Давайте разберемся что это за аббревиатуры: ИПР – индив

custom 527631360168507020918custom 52760029338156466456❤‍🔥4👎1

17 Jul 2026, 12:30 UTC655 views40 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Почему вас пока не заменит ИИ или как у нас украли проект С моими звёздочками делали с сентября уютный стартап проект для сохранения воспоминаний типо семейного архива И лендинг с метрикой и сам сервис полностью на коде и айдентику и даже бизнес модель. Вообщем запаковали всё, что можно Завершили его в июне и даже стали финалистами конкурса CREATIVE OPEN'26 в номинации Социально значимый проект — цифровой продукт

😢23😱13🤯3😁1

14 Jul 2026, 05:01 UTC802 views34 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Как банки усложняют пользовательские пути Вы знаете что моя карьера продуктового дизайнера плотно связана с банками и один из самых популярных вопросов которые я получаю от знакомых, это: «Почему в банках всё так сложно и неудобно, дизайнеры вообще про UX слышали?», мне одновременно и смешно, и хочется тяжело вздохнуть Правда, слышали. И поверьте, мы первым делом рисуем этот путь идеальным, в один клик и без лишнег

❤‍🔥24💘6👍2🤝1😭1

9 Jul 2026, 10:16 UTC785 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @ozondesignPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

😁13custom 52764544723174107684

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @chibichik. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 438,016 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Чибичик и интерфейсы” (@chibichik), 1,554 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chibichik.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.