Video, posted without a caption
😁1🙏1

Channel
@chestnyprod
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
33subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003271539537 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @chestnyprod |
| Created | Between 1 October 2025 and 28 February 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 29 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/chestnyprod |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 15:44 | 33 | +1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 15:23 | 32 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 01:31 | 33 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:11 | 33 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 13 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (13 June 2026 – 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | 34 |
| Reactions total | 6 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 01:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
73 reactions across 18 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 25 | 34.2% | |
| 🔥 | 18 | 24.7% | |
| 👏 | 8 | 11.0% | |
| 😁 | 6 | 8.22% | |
| 💊 | 3 | 4.11% | |
| 😢 | 3 | 4.11% | |
| 🙈 | 3 | 4.11% | |
| 👀 | 2 | 2.74% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 2.74% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 1.37% | |
| 🤝 | 1 | 1.37% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 1.37% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 73reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 13 June 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Video, posted without a caption
😁1🙏1
Э, чубрики, есть кто живой? Трудно поверить, но я это сделал. Съемка послезавтра. Всем ждать и верить. Будет разъеб жоский. Минут на 45 минимум. Все связь
❤4
Немного мотивации для творческих людей В 1996-м, когда “Бойцовский клуб” вышел в твёрдой обложке, я приехал подписывать книги в магазин... Мне было тридцать четыре года, и я по-прежнему пахал на заводе “Фрейтлайнер тракс”, хотя в 1986 году получил диплом журналиста. Более того, множество моих коллег по сборочному цеху имели точно такой же диплом. Мы шутили, мол, факультету журналистики Орегонского университета впо…
🔥4❤2
Переводил тут деньги через Т банк, а он мне предлагает такую интересную статью. Мрак какой-то, ладно «как», а ПОЧЕМУ врач-онколог живет на 60 тр? Впрочем, статья за ответ на этот вопрос тоже есть, но это статья в ук рф
😢3
Черновой вариант сценария к новому ролику уже готов; это было самое сложное исследование, которое я делал для сценариев вообще. Сама суть видео поменялась два раза: получился мини-фильм с открытым финалом. Так что работа идет медленно, но идет. Не теряемся!
🔥3❤2
Ребят, я дарю всем возможность! 🚀 вот вы все каждый день думаете, ну каково же быть звездой (875 подписчиков на ютубе, может уже пока читаете - 876, я не считаю…речь идет о трехзначных числах, или цифрах, неважно…). Каково это - работать в медиа? 📹 Продюсьеон, продаксьион, кхм, еще шампанского, силь ву пле… кхм 🥂 Да, это конечно свобода, это конечно драйв, секс, модели, дорогие квартиры, кокаин, самолет доставка е…
🙈3❤2
Посмотрите Это https://youtu.be/pWwQmikOoqg?si=8QsY83FO9lIJ_m8q
🔥2
Перечитал и разобрал 4 книги, купил около 60 часов скрытых из общего доступа видео, провел пару мини-расследований. Так идет работа над сценарием для следующего ролика. Ничего даже близкого на эту тему в ютубе не нашел -значит, будет интересно. Не теряемся!
🔥7
Угадай страну по комментарию 🕵️♂️
💊3
БЕРИ ПАЛЬТО И МЕЧТАЙ О ЧЕМ-ТО ВЕЛИКОМ https://youtu.be/5--E_kJEFU4?si=OWJhwP8-v2r9iC-d
🔥2
А если не бирка О БОЖЕ МИУ, такие же сапоги за 200 к так же яростно хотелось бы купить? Нет, все же Геббельс просто смешная мартышка по сравнению с Миуччей. Никто не унизит женщину так, как другая женщина, одной рукой продавая ей оверпрайс кал, а другой увольняя женщин за их жалобы на домогательства, воруя 400 млн евро налогов (в тч женщин), используя девочек в пдф рекламе. Ге ни а ль но
😁3
В комментариях на ютубе мне часто пишут, не найдя мыслей пооригинальнее, что «ну и что что Прада сделала все на деньги мужа?» (хотя сделал все он) А вот в том числе то, что фальшивые истории успеха ведут к пустым надеждам их повторить. Лично знаю человека, который влезал в кредиты, чтобы открыть в России модный бренд. Конечно, неудачно. Потому что в 🇷🇺 реальности: 209 000 малых и средних бизнесов (МСБ) закрылись в…
👀2❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @chestnyprod. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Дарксайд” (@chestnyprod), 33 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chestnyprod.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.