به زودی اطلاعات تکمیلی بارگذاری میشود ....😍🔥 با ما همراه باشید 👇👇👇👇 https://t.me/chess_academy_delamin
❤5🔥1

Channel
@chess_academy_delamin
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
341subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002972643806 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @chess_academy_delamin |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/chess_academy_delamin |
Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 77% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 10:19 | 341 | +3 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 08:37 | 338 | -3 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 13:06 | 341 | +1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 23:05 | 340 | no change |
| 14 Aug 2026, 05:48 | 340 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 10 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
102 reactions across 18 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 94.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 96 | 94.1% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 3.92% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 1.96% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 102 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
به زودی اطلاعات تکمیلی بارگذاری میشود ....😍🔥 با ما همراه باشید 👇👇👇👇 https://t.me/chess_academy_delamin
❤5🔥1
پدیده جوان دلامین قهرمان شد 🔥🏆😎 هشتمین دوره مسابقات آنلاین دلامین با قهرمانی پدیده جوان دلامین یاسین کیان سیرت به پایان رسید ❤😍 این مسابقه با حضور ۲۵ بازیکن زیر ۲۰۰۰ برگزار شد و نتایج زیر رقم خورد : قهرمان : یاسین کیان سیرت🏆🥇 ( ریتینگ فیده : 1805) نایب قهرمان : محمد آیین کلهری 🥈( ریتینگ فیده : 1662) مقام سوم : ایمان ایمانی ( ریتینگ فیده : 1866 ) مقام برتر توانیابان : سروش رست ( ریتینگ فیده : 1580 ) …
❤7🔥1
آکادمی شطرنج دلامین برگزار میکند : 😎🔥 هشتمین دوره مسابقات بلیتس دلامین به روش سوئیسی به صورت آنلاین در سایت لیچس 🔥😎 ( مخصوص زیر ۲۰۰۰ فیده ) 💵ورودیه : ۸۰ هزار تومان میباشد 💵 🔥 زمان هر بازیکن : 5 دقیقه بدون فیشر ( 5+0 ) در ۹ دور 🔥 🏆تاریخ و ساعت : چهارشنبه مورخ ۲۱ مرداد ماه ماه ۱۴۰۵ ساعت ۲۱ جوایز : قهرمان : ۴۰۰ هزار تومان 🏆 نایب قهرمان : ۳۰۰ هزار تومان مقام سوم : ۲۰۰ هزار تومان مقام اول بانوان : ۲۰۰ هزا…
❤5🔥1
تیم دلامین درخشان !! 😎🔥 تیم آکادمی شطرنج دلامین A با ترکیب استاد فیده محمد میران خادمی و استاد فیده مهرداد صداقتی در مسابقات تیمی رپید آهوران کاپ به مقام سوم بین 28 تیم آماده حاضر رسید 🔥 تیم آکادمی شطرنج دلامین B با ترکیب امین دلگشاد و امیرعلی روزبهانی در رده 16 جدول قرار گرفت🔥 لینک جدول مسابقه : https://s3.chess-results.com/tnr1470396.aspx?lan=1&art=0&rd=9&turdet=YES&SNode=S0 دفعه بعد بریم برای قهرمانی 😉😎🔥🏆…
❤8
یازدهمین دوره مسابقات شطرنج سلطنتی با همکاری آکادمی دلامین: گرامیداشت و همدلی با مردم شریف و صبور جنوب کشور 🔹چهارشنبه ۱۴ مرداد ساعت ۲۱ 🔹۳ دقیقه و ۲ ثانیه، 🔸در ۹ دور به روش سوئیسی
❤5
مربی های دلامین ترکوندن !! 😍💣🔥 استاد فیده محمد میران خادمی در مسابقات هفتگی فدراسیون شطرنج با عملکرد درخشان خود با کسب ۷.۵ امتیاز از ۹ بازی بین ۱۶۹ بازیکن و ۷ استاد تایتل دار به مقام سوم رسید 😍😎🔥 همچنین در همین جدول امین دلگشا با کسب ۶ امتیاز از ۹ بازی رتبه ۱۹ را کسب کرده و مقام برتر زیر ریتینگ ۱۶۰۰ را به خود اختصاص داد 💣😎🔥 لینک جدول مسابقه : https://s2.chess-results.com/tnr1464470.aspx?lan=1&art=1&rd=9&fed=IRI…
❤6
پدیده های جدید دلامین !!😍🏆 هفتمین دوره مسابقات آنلاین دلامین با قهرمانی ایمان ایمانی به پایان رسید ❤😍 این مسابقه با حضور ۲۳ بازیکن و ۴ استاد تایتل دار و ۶ بازیکن بالای ۲۰۰۰ برگزار شد و نتایج زیر رقم خورد : قهرمان : ایمان ایمانی 🏆( ریتینگ فیده : 1866 ) نایب قهرمان : صدرا روشنتاب ( ریتینگ فیده : 2040) مقام سوم : استاد فیده امیرحسین کاشفی ( ریتینگ فیده : 2169 ) مقام برتر توانیابان : سروش رست ( ریتینگ فیده :…
❤6
حضور استاد فیده باراد یگانگی در هفتمین دوره مسابقات دلامین ❤😍😎🔥 با ما همراه باشید 👇👇👇👇 https://t.me/chess_academy_delamin
❤4
حضور استاد فیده محمد میران خادمی در هفتمین دوره مسابقات دلامین ❤😍😎🔥 با ما همراه باشید 👇👇👇👇 https://t.me/chess_academy_delamin
❤4
حضور استاد فیده امیر حسین کاشفی در هفتمین دوره مسابقات دلامین ❤😍😎🔥 با ما همراه باشید 👇👇👇👇 https://t.me/chess_academy_delamin
❤5
حضور استاد بینالمللی بانوان آنوشا مهدیان ( قهرمان کشور ) در هفتمین دوره مسابقات دلامین 😍❤🔥😎 با ما همراه باشید 👇👇👇👇 https://t.me/chess_academy_delamin
❤5
آکادمی شطرنج دلامین برگزار میکند : 😍❤ هفتمین دوره مسابقات دلامین به روش سوئیسی به صورت آنلاین در سایت لیچس ❤😍 ( اوپن ) 💵ورودیه : ۹۰ هزار تومان میباشد 💵 نکته : ورودیه برای افراد تایتل دار رایگان میباشد 🔥 زمان هر بازیکن : 3 دقیقه بدون فیشر ( 3+0 ) در. ۹ دور 🔥 🏆تاریخ و ساعت : دوشنبه مورخ ۵ مرداد ماه ۱۴۰۵ ساعت ۲۱ جوایز : قهرمان : ۵۰۰ هزار تومان 🏆 نایب قهرمان : ۴۰۰ هزار تومان مقام سوم : ۲۰۰ هزار تومان مقا…
❤5
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @chess_academy_delamin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
نتیجه بازی چی میشه ؟!🔥
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 13 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@chess_academy_delamin named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“♟👑آکادمی آنلاین شطرنج دلامین👑 ♟” (@chess_academy_delamin), 341 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chess_academy_delamin.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.