Channel
@cherrilanes
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
42subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002663607659 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cherrilanes |
| Description | archive @cherrilane |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cherrilanes |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 17:15 | 42 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:17 | 42 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 25 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (25 June 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 34 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 17:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
@rocheveil Ini loh family yg malakin kami terus sampai kami kehabisan sa 😊❤️ Rocheveil keren, ungu ungu 💜 channel kalian jg sangat eye catching dan kalian terlihat sangat aktif terutama Ian-nya ada dimana-mana 💜
@StringOfScarvaine Merah merah pemberani loh ini ya ♥️ abis stalk ch nya dan beneran naksir, belah dada saya isinya ada tali merah yang berhubungan sama @StringOfScarvaine dan setiap detak jantung di dalamnya cuma mengeja satu nama itu (maaf alay dikit)
@EXILEROLE Halo Exilerole kalian keren bangett, seperti anime anime gituu hehe. Sempat lihat event yang kalian lakuin juga, keliatan menarik bangett. And your whole channel looks totally cooool!
@CasaDeDiaz Jujur pertama kali lihat langsung membatin wow keren, merah merah dark sepertii di film-film secret agent. Naksir banget juga sama konsep pfpnyaa, beneran mendalami karakter as secret agent, bintang 100 buat CasaDeDiaz
@sugarwheep Baru pertama kali lihat sugarwheep, paguy baruuu Wonhee yaa ini. Lucu banget namanyaa dan bionya juga lucuuu banget, keliatannya juga sugarwheep diisi sama dd dd Wonhee yg imut, lucu, kecil, unyu, setara yakult kemasan sachet
Channel photo updated
Sticker, posted without a caption
t.me/CherriEina yah si museless ini lg, dd mukanya ada berapa hmm.. fi aku ke dd itu museless banget, sebenernya kita sm aja sih 😊, dd juga Convobuilder banget, aku ship dd sm woojin #gusbayem
t.me/sarangblea hi dd aku bilangin ke thimblea ya km makan sabret gak bagi bagi. Dd keliatan naturally funny tau, who your bias I'm your bias 🥳 aku ship dd sm woonhak
t.me/Yzjin cc km cantik bat dah, makasih ya udh excited banget aku main haha aku terharu sumpah 😢, fi aku ke Cece itu cc lovely banget, dan keliatan seru buat diajak ngobrol. Aku ship cc sm pacar cc ya, aku shipper no 1 🥳
t.me/ianpentol hmmm si dd satu ini mah BOKEM jir 😂✌️🏻 jangan lupa dd besok imunisasi dl km, dia juga vibesnya summer banget seger kayak es cendol. Aku ship km sama Juhoon dd
t.me/Chengxuahn haiiii dd, kamu minimalis banget, sangat seonghyeon coded akunnya sketru. Aku ship kamu sm pacar km ya coty
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @cherrilanes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@cherrilanes named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Cherrilane's Archive” (@cherrilanes), 42 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cherrilanes.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.