Channel
@cherrilanes
On this record: Topic · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
34subscribers
-8 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002663607659 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cherrilanes |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 4 times, most recently 10 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cherrilanes |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 30 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 72% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
This channel is in a group of 2 registered channels linked by matching posts. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Oct 2026, 03:35 | 34 | -1 |
| 10 Oct 2026, 13:41 | 35 | -2 |
| 29 Sept 2026, 17:35 | 37 | -1 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 22:16 | 38 | -3 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 11:16 | 41 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 17:15 | 42 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:17 | 42 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 25 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
@rocheveil Ini loh family yg malakin kami terus sampai kami kehabisan sa 😊❤️ Rocheveil keren, ungu ungu 💜 channel kalian jg sangat eye catching dan kalian terlihat sangat aktif terutama Ian-nya ada dimana-mana 💜
@StringOfScarvaine Merah merah pemberani loh ini ya ♥️ abis stalk ch nya dan beneran naksir, belah dada saya isinya ada tali merah yang berhubungan sama @StringOfScarvaine dan setiap detak jantung di dalamnya cuma mengeja satu nama itu (maaf alay dikit)
@EXILEROLE Halo Exilerole kalian keren bangett, seperti anime anime gituu hehe. Sempat lihat event yang kalian lakuin juga, keliatan menarik bangett. And your whole channel looks totally cooool!
@CasaDeDiaz Jujur pertama kali lihat langsung membatin wow keren, merah merah dark sepertii di film-film secret agent. Naksir banget juga sama konsep pfpnyaa, beneran mendalami karakter as secret agent, bintang 100 buat CasaDeDiaz
@sugarwheep Baru pertama kali lihat sugarwheep, paguy baruuu Wonhee yaa ini. Lucu banget namanyaa dan bionya juga lucuuu banget, keliatannya juga sugarwheep diisi sama dd dd Wonhee yg imut, lucu, kecil, unyu, setara yakult kemasan sachet
Channel photo updated
t.me/CherriEina yah si museless ini lg, dd mukanya ada berapa hmm.. fi aku ke dd itu museless banget, sebenernya kita sm aja sih 😊, dd juga Convobuilder banget, aku ship dd sm woojin #gusbayem
Sticker, posted without a caption
Sticker, posted without a caption
@Cherrilane's Sangwon :3 read the whisper
t.me/sangwoncherri hmmm Koko nih orgnya baik banget guys (boong) dia nih humble banget (jujur) terus dia juga imut, aku ship Koko sm Geonwoo ok ♥️
Sticker, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @cherrilanes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@cherrilanes named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Cherrilane's Archive” (@cherrilanes), 34 subscribers as measured 18 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cherrilanes.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.