Channel
@chequehunters
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Domains linked from posts · Cite this entry
514,945subscribers
-2,983 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 316,228–1,000,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001797086880 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @chequehunters |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/chequehunters |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 43% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 19:48 | 514,945 | -493 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 22:22 | 515,438 | -511 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 19:13 | 515,949 | -440 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 17:01 | 516,389 | -401 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 15:43 | 516,790 | -510 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:03 | 517,300 | -365 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 13:35 | 517,665 | -263 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 00:53 | 517,928 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 28 February 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
6,598 reactions across 19 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2,502 | 37.9% | |
| 🤡 | 1,435 | 21.7% | |
| 😁 | 1,415 | 21.4% | |
| 🍌 | 706 | 10.7% | |
| 🤓 | 245 | 3.71% | |
| ✍ | 180 | 2.73% | |
| 💋 | 115 | 1.74% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,598reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 28 February 2025 to 9 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @chequehunters. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 February 2025 to 9 September 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
⚡️ Важное напоминание⚡️ Если бот работает с проблемами, то так и должно быть. Наши продукты созданы, чтобы дарить эмоции. А что может быть ярче эмоций, когда оплаченная услуга не оказана или оказана с непредсказуемым результатом? 🔮
😁138🤡50❤42✍16🍌7
Для тех, кто уже забыл, что мы существуем: когда-то сделали Telegram Moments, который минтит сообщения и посты из Телеграма в NFT на TON. Пересылаешь сообщение → оно минтится → и ты владелец лучшего цифрового следа в истории в единственном экземпляре (если бот не залагает). Короче, мы прикрутили автоминт для владельцев каналов. Если у тебя есть канал, можно оформить подписку и твои посты будут минтиться в NFT автома…
😁45❤29🤓12🍌8💋6🤡4
Лучший маркетинг телеграм подарков?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
😁111🤡24🍌21🤓11💋8❤7
Статистика канала говорит, что 49% подписчиков используют русский язык. Это что, опять по-русски щитпостить?
😁171✍34🤡20❤14🤓6🍌5💋4
Congratulations to the TON Foundation for choosing such a fitting name for their sticker marketplace.
❤51😁25🤡22🍌8
Here we go again…
🤡228❤105🍌48🤓27😁23✍19💋8
🇫🇷 Best things you can do in France: Leave
😁529❤126🤡60✍34🍌23💋13🤓9
Every time I choose happiness over playing by the rules, the number of posts and cheques here nosedives like a failed Hollywood reboot. We wrapped up our little Oscar experiment and sent out the prizes. Big shoutout to everyone who joined in! ❤️ Make Web2 Great… someday. Maybe. 🎭
❤91😁35🤓19💋7🤡4
After chatting with our subscribers, we found out that a part of our audience consists of teenagers 13-14 and older. (we fully support their ambition to be part of the TON community and collect Telegram gifts) Meanwhile, our pinned message? Just vibing. 🍆 gn 🌙 tomorrow, there will be new cheques still more more than 0
❤101😁48🍌23🤡20🤓11✍1
Your cheque for 30 TON (100.2$) is completed.
🤡149❤63🍌33😁24🤓10💋4✍1
🚀 Multi-cheque for 30 TON (100.2$) with password Inside cheque: 1000 activation(s) for 0.03 TON (0.1$)
🤡240❤45😁39🍌25🤓7
We got a request in the comments to split the cheque into smaller amounts, so more people can get a piece instead of just a few. Looks fair. The rules stay the same: guess the password and enter the correct movie title. 📦 This time, it’s a different film from the 2025 Oscar nominees — make sure to enter the original English title with the first letter capitalized.
🤡45❤15😁11🍌7🤓4💋1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @chequehunters. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Лучший маркетинг телеграм подарков?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 28 February 2025 to 9 September 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 189,378 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
One domainthis channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Cheques” (@chequehunters), 514,945 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chequehunters.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.