Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for I ⋆♡⟡ KPR

Channel

I ⋆♡⟡ KPR

@chempik1234_1

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

20subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003138320719
TypeChannel
Username@chempik1234_1
CreatedBetween 1 September 2025 and 30 November 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live3 October 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 3 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/chempik1234_1

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 3 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

192019.510 August 2026 — 20 subscribers11 August 2026 — 20 subscribers24 August 2026 — 19 subscribers3 October 2026 — 20 subscribers10 August 20263 October 2026
4 measurements spanning 54 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 19–20 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
3 Oct 2026, 17:3920+1
24 Aug 2026, 18:4319-1
11 Aug 2026, 16:1520no change
10 Aug 2026, 21:4520first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

23 reactions across 8 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1043.5%
custom 5375371992960623907730.4%
❤‍🔥313.0%
🔥313.0%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 23 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 11:12 UTC39 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥3

7 Aug 2026, 17:57 UTC36 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Меня не было последние 4 дня я очень хорошо отдыхал

❤1

29 Jul 2026, 21:20 UTC64 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Я не ел бургеры целых 3 дня

custom 53753719929606239072

29 Jul 2026, 19:45 UTC63 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Если бы я знал, чего хочу достичь, мне бы не пришлось искать вопросы, чтобы потом самому на них отвечать

custom 53753719929606239072

29 Jul 2026, 19:45 UTC60 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Мне кажется, реальность слишком сильно переплетена, чтобы пытаться описать всё сразу. Получить нужный вывод можно тогда и только тогда, когда взят нужный срез, то есть интересующие нас вещи рассматриваются под определённым углом, а не интересующие — отбрасываются. У графа или модели обязана быть цель применения. И для любой цели есть множества интересующих и не интересующих (нерелевантных) вещей. Однако для того, …

❤2

29 Jul 2026, 10:28 UTC53 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Я не знаю, как это описать, но я попробую У меня всегда было желание загнать, засунуть привычные вещи в абстракции и представить (изобразить) в виде отношений однородных абстрактных объектов, которые бы представляли любое мыслимое явление или существо. Например, мысли, межличностные отношения, аналитические отчёты - главное взять правильный "срез", в нужном месте и под правильным углом, для получения выводов в нужно…

❤3

25 Jul 2026, 18:49 UTC54 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Мои глаза полузакрыты почти всегда 🐱🐰

❤2custom 53753719929606239071

23 Jul 2026, 16:57 UTC51 views7 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

🍊Апэлсин Я люблю оранжевый, теперь его будет больше

🔥3❤2custom 53753719929606239072

22 Jul 2026, 11:14 UTC53 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Есть целая официальная игра про honda fit против пожирателей бензина 🙂‍↔️ Да-да, очень интересное совпадение Ссылки на офиц. сайты Honda рабочие и ведут на вебархив

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @chempik1234_1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“I ⋆♡⟡ KPR” (@chempik1234_1), 20 subscribers as measured 3 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chempik1234_1.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.