Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Химичу с кайфом

Channel

Химичу с кайфом

@chemkaif

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry

84subscribers

+8 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002333640791
TypeChannel
Username@chemkaif
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/chemkaif

Growth

7684807 August 2026 — 76 subscribers9 August 2026 — 76 subscribers15 August 2026 — 80 subscribers23 August 2026 — 82 subscribers6 September 2026 — 84 subscribers7 August 20266 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 30 days, net +8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 75–85 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Sept 2026, 17:1784+2
23 Aug 2026, 17:0882+2
15 Aug 2026, 02:1380+4
9 Aug 2026, 21:0176no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:3676first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 25 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
6s
Average length
6s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

357 reactions across 19 posts, in 26 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
9526.6%
🔥6016.8%
5214.6%
❤‍🔥277.56%
custom 5283113363843342611226.16%
💅133.64%
custom 5413379717636054871123.36%
🥰123.36%
💘113.08%
🙏92.52%
🆒82.24%
🤩61.68%
custom 526487205362166263851.40%
custom 528293020066803844341.12%
💯41.12%
custom 546962932376379667030.84%
😎30.84%
👏20.56%
🗿20.56%
custom 524032163830564350610.28%
6 further kinds61.68%

Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 357 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 December 2025 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
18
across the posts below
Posts paid on
10
of 20 we hold a reading for · 50%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @chemkaif. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 December 2025 to 3 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 16:07 UTC71 views21 reactions2 Starsread 9 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🔥12🤩32💘2custom 52831133638433426112

11 Jul 2026, 08:59 UTC176 views17 reactions1 Starread 9 August 2026
Photo

«Без химии» — главный обман маркетологов: почему даже яблоко на 100% состоит из химических элементов 🍏 «100% натурально», «без химикатов», «эко-продукт». Мы каждый день видим эти надписи на упаковках и верим, что покупаем что-то кристально чистое. Маркетологи превратили слово «химия» в синоним яда и токсинов. Но если бы они хорошо учили этот предмет в школе, то знали бы: абсолютно всё вокруг нас — это чистая химия.

🔥64💘4custom 528311336384334261121

4 Jul 2026, 09:02 UTC228 views24 reactions2 Starsread 9 August 2026

Самая сильная кислота в мире: почему плавиковая растворяет стекло, но считается «слабачкой»📞 Кинематограф внушил нам, что самая опасная кислота — это та, которая мгновенно прожигает металл, бетон и стекло. В сериале «Во все тяжкие» герои растворяют улики в плавиковой (фтороводородной) кислоте, ведь она легко разъедает даже прочное стекло. Но если вы спросите химика, он удивит вас: с точки зрения науки плавиковая кис

95💅4custom 54696293237637966703💘1🤩1custom 52831133638433426111

27 Jun 2026, 17:03 UTC283 views15 reactions2 Starsread 9 August 2026

Молекула-магнит: как гиалуронка держит тонну воды на себе🤓 Вы точно видели ее на баночках в ванной. Косметологи молятся на нее, а маркетологи пихают в каждый крем. Но в случае с гиалуроновой кислотой реклама не врет: это реальный супергерой. Всего 1 грамм этой магии способен удержать до 6 литров воды! 😍 Как устроена эта магия?✨ Представьте молекулу гиалуронки как гигантскую невидимую пружину или сверхумную губку. П

5💅4🔥42

21 Jun 2026, 12:00 UTC263 views26 reactions2 Starsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Сахар спасает от отравления цианидом??😱😱 Из исторических источников известен такой случай: В декабре 1916 года в подвале Юсуповского дворца разыгралась одна из самых мистических драм в истории России. Заговорщики во главе с князем Феликсом Юсуповым твердо решили ликвидировать Григория Распутина. Для гарантии они выбрали страшное оружие — цианистый калий. Концентрация яда в приготовленных угощениях была колоссальной.

115❤‍🔥5🔥2💊1💘1🤩1

13 Jun 2026, 17:01 UTC226 views25 reactions1 Starread 9 August 2026

А еще поздравляю тех, у кого закончились все экзамены!!✨ У кого еще остались — желаю спокойствия и легких вариантов!!!🤩

8🔥6🙏62💘1🤗1🤩1

13 Jun 2026, 16:58 UTC387 views18 reactions4 Starsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Итак, после долгого перерыва хочу вам рассказать о таком процессе как ректификация нефти!☺️ Что такое ректификация?📎 Ректификация — это способ разделения компонентов смеси, основанный на свойстве компонентов данной смеси выкипать при различных температурах. Какое оборудование используется для этого процесса?📌 Ректификационная колонна(изображена на фото) является одним из центральных аппаратов технологической устано

10💅32👀1🔥1custom 52829302006680384431

1 Feb 2026, 20:22 UTC348 views15 reactionsread 9 August 2026
File

🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 2️⃣ Решения можете прислать мне в лс или в лс тгк!✨

🥰743custom 54133797176360548711

31 Jan 2026, 19:23 UTC363 views18 reactions2 Starsread 9 August 2026
File

🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 Всем участвовавшим большое спасибо! Завтра выпущу новый комплект заданий)💗

9🔥32💅1💘1😎1custom 52831133638433426111

25 Jan 2026, 06:59 UTC437 views20 reactionsread 9 August 2026
File

🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 1️⃣ Постарался подобрать интересные задания, если хотите, можете прислать мне в лс решения или в лс тгк, я проверю☺️

12custom 52831133638433426114🔥3custom 54133797176360548711

24 Jan 2026, 07:27 UTC405 views14 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Ну, что, тогда завтра выкладываю сюда первый комплект, а в следующую субботу разбор?🙄

6🔥4🗿2🦄1custom 52831133638433426111

23 Jan 2026, 18:43 UTC414 views0 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Poll

Делаем?

  1. Кайф, давай!93%
  2. Не надо7%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @chemkaif. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

23 Jan 2026, 18:43 UTCAnonymous Poll44 voters

Делаем?

  1. Кайф, давай!93%
  2. Не надо7%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

8 Jan 2026, 15:44 UTCAnonymous Poll70 voters

Что вы хотите видеть в этом канале?

  1. ЕГЭшку(файлы и тд)44%
  2. Прикольные химические истории56%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 December 2025 to 3 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Химичу с кайфом” (@chemkaif), 84 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chemkaif.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.