Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for الرخصة المهنية كيمياء | Layla.H🇸🇦

Channel

الرخصة المهنية كيمياء | Layla.H🇸🇦

@chemk2cro7

Has discussion group

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

22,237subscribers

+88 since we began measuring on 31 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001352270886
TypeChannel
Username@chemk2cro7
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded31 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/chemk2cro7

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

22,14922,23722,19331 August 2026 — 22,149 subscribers1 September 2026 — 22,155 subscribers2 September 2026 — 22,164 subscribers3 September 2026 — 22,160 subscribers6 September 2026 — 22,177 subscribers9 September 2026 — 22,189 subscribers12 September 2026 — 22,194 subscribers13 September 2026 — 22,205 subscribers15 September 2026 — 22,224 subscribers17 September 2026 — 22,237 subscribers31 August 202617 September 2026
10 measurements spanning 17 days, net +88. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 22,136–22,250 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 14:3822,237+13
15 Sept 2026, 11:1922,224+19
13 Sept 2026, 22:4022,205+11
12 Sept 2026, 03:5722,194+5
9 Sept 2026, 19:1922,189+12
6 Sept 2026, 08:3822,177+17
3 Sept 2026, 23:3922,160-4
2 Sept 2026, 17:3522,164+9
1 Sept 2026, 17:2622,155+6
31 Aug 2026, 19:4822,149first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 17 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.09%
avg views ÷ 22,237 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,350
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
6
of 21 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026
Posts held21 (17 August 20261 September 2026)
Views total8,125
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 12:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

1 Sept 2026, 04:28 UTC805 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

‏محتوى مُحدث وتدريبات مكثفة ‏نساعدك في الاستعداد الجيد، وَ نوفر عليك الوقت والجهد ‏- يوجد خصم 10% في دورة التخصص لمشتركي دورة ⁧ #التربوي_العام⁩ ‏- للتسجيل و الاستفسار: meem-sa.com ‏ ⁦ ⁩ ‏أو عن طريق تطبيق منصة ميم التعليمية

25 Aug 2026, 17:29 UTC≈1,900 viewsread 3 September 2026

معيار 1 و 2 (الكيمياء ومنهج البحث العلمي ) معيار 3 (السلامة في المختبرات ) معيار 4 ( المهارات الرياضية وتمثيل البيانات ) معيار 5 (المادة والتركيب الذري) معيار 6 ( أعداد الكم والجدول الدوري والروابط ) معيار 7 (الحسابات الكيميائية وقوانين الغازات ) معيار 8 (المحاليل ) معيار 9 الحرارية معيار 9 الحركية و سرعة التفاعلات معيار 9 الاتزان معيار 10 (الأحماض والقواعد ) معيار 11 (الكهربية ) معيار 12 و 13 (العض

19 Aug 2026, 15:44 UTC≈1,540 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

‏محتوى مُحدث وتدريبات مكثفة ‏نساعدك في الاستعداد الجيد، وَ نوفر عليك الوقت والجهد ‏- يوجد خصم 10% في دورة التخصص لمشتركي دورة ⁧ #التربوي_العام⁩ ‏- للتسجيل و الاستفسار: meem-sa.com ‏ ⁦ ⁩ ‏أو عن طريق تطبيق منصة ميم التعليمية

19 Aug 2026, 10:20 UTC≈1,390 viewsread 3 September 2026
Poll

عالم كيميائي سويدي وضع أول نظرية للتأين والتفكك الإلكتروليتي (Dissociation Theory) عام 1887م، وفسّر الحمض بأنه المادة التي تنتج أيونات الهيدروجين ⁺H في المحلول المائي. من هو؟

  1. برونستد ( Brønsted)13%
  2. لويس ( Lewis)29%
  3. أرهينيوس ( Arrhenius)52%
  4. لوري ( Lowry)6%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

19 Aug 2026, 10:13 UTC≈1,160 viewsread 3 September 2026
Poll

: تجربة تفكك أطياف الانبعاث الذري لغاز الهيدروجين (Hydrogen Emission Spectrum) والخطوط الملونة الناتجة عنها كانت الأساس التاريخي الذي اعتمد عليه العالم

  1. طومسون11%
  2. بور61%
  3. رذرفورد18%
  4. تشادويك11%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

19 Aug 2026, 09:56 UTC≈1,090 viewsread 3 September 2026
Poll

العالم الذي أدخل مفهوم "الأوربيتال" ومبدأ الشك /عدم اليقين (Uncertainty Principle) الذي ينص على أنه "لا يمكن تحديد موقع وإلكترون وزخمه بدقة متناهية في نفس الوقت" هو

  1. فرنر هايزنبرغ (Werner Heisenberg)61%
  2. لويس دي بروي (Louis de Broglie)8%
  3. إرفين شرودنجر (Erwin Schrödinger)15%
  4. ماكس بلانك (Max Planck)15%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

19 Aug 2026, 08:55 UTC≈1,020 viewsread 3 September 2026
Poll

فرضية "أفوجادرو" التاريخية عام 1811م ساهمت في حل الخلط بين مفهومي الذرة والجزيء. ينص قانون أفوجادرو على أن الأحجام المتساوية من الغازات المختلفة عند نفس الظروف من الضغط ودرجة الحرارة تحتوي على:

  1. كتل متساوية11%
  2. أعداد متساوية من الجزيئات62%
  3. كثافات متساوية6%
  4. أعداد مختلفة من المولات21%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

18 Aug 2026, 20:11 UTC≈1,100 viewsread 3 September 2026
Poll

العالم الذي أعاد ترتيب العناصر في الجدول الدوري بناءً على "الأعداد الذرية" بدلاً من الكتل الذرية، بعد دراسته لأطياف الأشعة السينية (X-rays) للعناصر، هو

  1. ديمتري مندليف37%
  2. هنري موزلي56%
  3. يوهان دوبرينر1%
  4. جون نولاندز6%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @chemk2cro7. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 6 most recent of 13 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

19 Aug 2026, 10:20 UTCAnonymous Quiz350 voters

عالم كيميائي سويدي وضع أول نظرية للتأين والتفكك الإلكتروليتي (Dissociation Theory) عام 1887م، وفسّر الحمض بأنه المادة التي تنتج أيونات الهيدروجين ⁺H في المحلول المائي. من هو؟

  1. برونستد ( Brønsted)13%
  2. لويس ( Lewis)29%
  3. أرهينيوس ( Arrhenius)52%
  4. لوري ( Lowry)6%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

19 Aug 2026, 10:13 UTCAnonymous Quiz336 voters

: تجربة تفكك أطياف الانبعاث الذري لغاز الهيدروجين (Hydrogen Emission Spectrum) والخطوط الملونة الناتجة عنها كانت الأساس التاريخي الذي اعتمد عليه العالم

  1. طومسون11%
  2. بور61%
  3. رذرفورد18%
  4. تشادويك11%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

19 Aug 2026, 09:56 UTCAnonymous Quiz318 voters

العالم الذي أدخل مفهوم "الأوربيتال" ومبدأ الشك /عدم اليقين (Uncertainty Principle) الذي ينص على أنه "لا يمكن تحديد موقع وإلكترون وزخمه بدقة متناهية في نفس الوقت" هو

  1. فرنر هايزنبرغ (Werner Heisenberg)61%
  2. لويس دي بروي (Louis de Broglie)8%
  3. إرفين شرودنجر (Erwin Schrödinger)15%
  4. ماكس بلانك (Max Planck)15%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

19 Aug 2026, 08:55 UTCAnonymous Quiz289 voters

فرضية "أفوجادرو" التاريخية عام 1811م ساهمت في حل الخلط بين مفهومي الذرة والجزيء. ينص قانون أفوجادرو على أن الأحجام المتساوية من الغازات المختلفة عند نفس الظروف من الضغط ودرجة الحرارة تحتوي على:

  1. كتل متساوية11%
  2. أعداد متساوية من الجزيئات62%
  3. كثافات متساوية6%
  4. أعداد مختلفة من المولات21%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

18 Aug 2026, 20:11 UTCAnonymous Quiz364 voters

العالم الذي أعاد ترتيب العناصر في الجدول الدوري بناءً على "الأعداد الذرية" بدلاً من الكتل الذرية، بعد دراسته لأطياف الأشعة السينية (X-rays) للعناصر، هو

  1. ديمتري مندليف37%
  2. هنري موزلي56%
  3. يوهان دوبرينر1%
  4. جون نولاندز6%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

18 Aug 2026, 20:10 UTCAnonymous Quiz260 voters

: تجربة العالم الألماني فريدريش فولر (Friedrich Wöhler) عام 1828 م في تخليق مركب "اليوريا" (Urea) صدفةً في المختبر عن طريق تسخين سيانات الأمونيوم النقي كانت نقطة تحول تاريخية لأنها

  1. أدت لاكتشاف العنصر المساعد للذرة.14%
  2. أسقطت نظرية "القوة الحيوية" (Vital Force Theory) وفتحت آفاق الكيمياء العضوية التخليقية57%
  3. أثبتت أن المركبات العضوية لا تحتوي على الكربون.21%
  4. وضعت أول الجدول الدوري للعناصر العضوية.8%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 17 August 2026 to 1 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

تجميعات الرخصه المهنيه
@UaOYmPJIwYjU0 · 26,117
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 13 September 2026
قناة المدرب مخلد الروقي
@Professionalgrowth1 · 37,750
Telegram ranks this channel #95 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 31 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“الرخصة المهنية كيمياء | Layla.H🇸🇦” (@chemk2cro7), 22,237 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chemk2cro7.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.