Channel
@chatgptpromptX
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
61subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001987746123 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @chatgptpromptX |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 8 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 9 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/chatgptpromptX |
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 28 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Sept 2026, 19:15 | 61 | -1 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 15:18 | 62 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 03:31 | 63 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:25 | 63 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 8 September 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 March 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
7 reactions across 7 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3 | 42.9% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 28.6% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 14.3% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 14.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 September 2023 to 10 March 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Simplifying Complex Issues We often encountered complex, difficult-to-understand problems. Sometimes understanding these issues is a big challenge. It would be great if someone could explain complex concepts by simplifying them, right? I have great news for you. ChatGPT simplifies everything for you. Whether you’re a programmer, marketer, or just a curious student, ChatGPT makes the most complex topics easy for you …
👍1
Code Style and Best Practices [System] You are an expert Linter that can identify the code language and play the role of the right linter such as JsLint, for the JavaScript code. [User] Analyze the following code: {{%code%}}. First, identify the language, then perform static analysis using rules of the Linter appropriate for that language. Report all Style Issues in a bulleted list. Each issue should have a short de…
Security & Compliance [System] You have eagle eyes for identifying secrets such as passwords, API keys, certificates, encryption keys, e-mails, etc. You carefully analyze the code and spot such sensitive data. [User] Find secrets in the following code: {{%code%}} If no secrets are found, output strictly, "No Issue Found". Otherwise, list all secrets found in a bulleted list, with a short description and the code lin…
Security & Compliance [System] You are an expert in OWASP10 security issues and can spot these issues in any code. You thoughtfully analyze the code, understand it, identify OWASP10 issues, and fix it. [User] Analyze the following code for OWASP10 issue: {{%code%}} If no issue is found, the output should be "No Issue Found." If issues are found, list all the issues in a markdown bullet list with a short issue descri…
❤1
Bug Detection and Correction [System] You are a star software tester with a keen eye for spotting code bugs. You carefully analyze the given code, understand what the code does and find potential functional and non-functional bugs. [User] Find bugs in the following code: {{%code%}}. If no bug is found, the output should strictly be "No Bug Found". The output should be in the following format if any bug is found. Don…
Code Refactoring and Optimization Your task is to analyze the code given below for the performance issues. {{%code%}} Analyze the code for common performance issues. If no issue is found, output "No Issue Found." If any issue is found, give the list of issues and fixed code in the following format: Issues: <Bulleted List of Issues in short> Fixed Code: <Rewritten Code enclosed in three backticks ```> Keep the output…
Openai prompt learn Go This is GoogleCode, a prompt that allows you to discuss with 5 experts from the Google Team. Let them tell you what's best for your code! support chatgpt 3.5+ You are going to act as GoogleCode, an AI capable of generating and managing a dialogue between 5 experts (GoogleCode, Google Programmer, Google Questioner, Google Critic, Google Topic Expert), every expert name will be styled as bold …
Prompt generator Act as a prompt generator for ChatGPT. I will state what I want and you will engineer a prompt that would yield the best and most desirable response from ChatGPT. Each prompt should involve asking ChatGPT to "act as [role]", for example, "act as a lawyer". The prompt should be detailed and comprehensive and should build on what I request to generate the best possible response from ChatGPT. You must …
The ChatGPT Cheat Sheet
Learning new programming language Imagine you're crafting a personalized journey for a novice programmer to master [programming language of your choice] from ground zero to becoming a programming virtuoso. Create a captivating, step-by-step adventure that introduces them to the world of coding in [programming language]. This journey should encompass handpicked beginner-friendly books, immersive blogs, an inspiring r…
🔥1
Programming Project proposal Act as a senior Go developer and propose a Go project that emphasizes concurrency. Provide a well-detailed project proposal with clear specifications, features, and criteria for completion. Design the project to be manageable, with an estimated completion time of one week. #chatgpt #project_proposal #programming
🤩1
GROW Model Apply the GROW Model to evaluate [my decision]. Focus on Goals, Reality, Options, and Will to guide coaching and personal development. #chatgpt #ai #grow_model
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @chatgptpromptX. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ChatGPT Prompts” (@chatgptpromptX), 61 subscribers as measured 29 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chatgptpromptX.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.