Channel
@chatgpt_in_ae
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
252subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002275294561 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @chatgpt_in_ae |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/chatgpt_in_ae |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 23:36 | 252 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:30 | 251 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:06 | 251 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 9 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
63 reactions across 9 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 63 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 63reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 9 August 2025 to 23 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
▶️ Update 1.2.0 is now available! Here is the full list of new features: 📞 The AI now talks to you. When you send a request to create something, the AI will immediately tell you what it is going to do, and then start working. (Previously, the AI performed the task silently.) ✏️ Clarifications from the AI. If your request lacks specifics, the AI will offer several options for how it can be implemented. (Previously,…
❤2
Tomorrow 🗓
❤4
👀 Всё, что вы видите на предпросмотре, было создано нашим расширением из шейповых слоёв — всего за один запрос и менее чем за минуту. Теперь представьте, сколько времени ушло бы, чтобы воссоздать такие сцены вручную из обычных шейпов. Обновление вскоре станет доступно нашим пользователям и они сразу же смогут опробовать новые возможности проекта! Everything you see in the preview was created by our extension from sh…
❤9
A little over a month has passed since the release, and I’d like to sum up the results of the past month: 50K+ views on the post 180 channel subscribers 95 users added to the database 1,188 total requests made 10,634,203 tokens used 316 images generated We’ve also identified a large number of bugs, which we’re currently fixing. In addition, we’ve added the ability to upload and edit your own images, developed a new…
❤6
🤝
⭐⭐⭐⭐We present our collaboration with ChatGPT in After Effects extension! Speed Up Your After Effects Workflow with ChatGPT! Our extension automates routine tasks, helping you work several times faster. ● Writes Expressions: Just describe the task, and GPT will do it for you. ● Creates Layers: Generate dozens of shapes with effects in just a couple of seconds. ● Generates Images: Create and add graphics to your…
🎉Спасибо за 100 подписчиков! Хотел также сообщить, что в последних обновлениях мы добавили поддержку английского языка во всём, что связано с плагином: само расширение, бот для покупки и группа сообщества. И сделали мы это не просто так! Уже в это воскресенье состоится анонс нашей коллаборации с @megacoursenew, а большая часть его аудитории говорит на английском. После анонса посты в этом канале будут выходить на …
❤2
Работаем над добавлением нового функционала, которого так не хватало.
❤11
☀️ Мы думаем насчет улучшения функционала плагина и вы можете нам помочь, проголосовав в опросе ниже, чтобы мы могли выставить приоритеты по добавлению/улучшению функций. Какие функции вы бы чаще использовали в плагине?
The shares total 237%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Акция с подпиской за репост завершена! Еще раз благодарю всех за репосты, нормально похайпили)
❤3
🙌 Благодарю всех за репосты! Вы делаете неимоверный вклад в развитие проекта. Всем, кто репостил пост к себе в тгк, были выданы недельные подписки. Если кого-то забыл — напишите мне
❤9
🤩 ChatGPT в After Effects — больше не во снах. 🧠 Пора перестать игнорировать прогресс нейросетей и уже ощутить его на себе! Теперь ты можешь ускорить свой рабочий процесс в несколько раз, ведь все монотонные и рутинные задачи берет на себя ChatGPT! — 💻 Захотел прописать expression, но не знаешь, как правильно это сделать? Не нужно гуглить, просто попроси об этом GPT, он поймет твой запрос с полуслова и выполнит его…
❤17
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @chatgpt_in_ae. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
☀️ Мы думаем насчет улучшения функционала плагина и вы можете нам помочь, проголосовав в опросе ниже, чтобы мы могли выставить приоритеты по добавлению/улучшению функций. Какие функции вы бы чаще использовали в плагине?
The shares total 237%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 9 August 2025 to 23 November 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 709,533 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ChatGPT in After Effects” (@chatgpt_in_ae), 252 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chatgpt_in_ae.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.