Channel
@chasehz_sjda
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
722subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 27 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002391693505 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @chasehz_sjda |
| Description | 👤 唯一管理: @chase_lz_bot 🤖 作业投稿: @chasehzxc_bot ——————————— 杭州野寻 · 群组目录 狼友大群: @chasehz_jlq 老师榜单: @chasehz_lsda 精选榜单:@chasehz_lsjx 报告榜单: @chasehz_zypj 榜单导航: @chasehz_bddh ❤️一键关注所有频道： https://t.me/addlist/npwaD3jQXSo5M2Nl |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 27 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/chasehz_sjda |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Sept 2026, 15:22 | 722 | no change |
| 27 Sept 2026, 14:47 | 722 | first reading |
1 post held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 1 post for this entry, the most recent from 28 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 1 sampled post in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1 most recent post we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 28 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
😀 野寻 · 杭州修车导航 😀 ~西湖月色照清宵，邂逅知音话寂寥~ ~断桥残雪情犹在，一笑相逢忘寂寥~ 新手中心 : 【野寻 · 杭州使用手册】 😀野寻大讲堂 └ 作业模版 └ 积分商城 └ 会员制度 └ 工兵模版 └ 查找老师 └ 活动公告 😀杭州榜单导航 └ 按价格 └ 按地区 └ 按服务 └ 按标签 😀 其他资源 └ 野寻· 杭州外围 └ 野寻· 杭州包养 └ 野寻· 杭州商家 ⚡【野寻· 杭州】榜单结构 ├ 打卡通告群 @chasehz_tgq ├ 学生交流群 @chasehz_jlq ├ 小喇叭 @chasehz_xlb ├ 榜单导航 @chasehz_bddh ├ 修车档案 @chasehz_lsda ├ 精选档案 @chasehz_lsjx ├ 作业评价 @chasehz_zypj …
❤1
Showing the 1 most recent of 1 post we hold for @chasehz_sjda. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“野寻·杭州商家档案” (@chasehz_sjda), 722 subscribers as measured 27 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chasehz_sjda.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.