Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for چارتستان | آموزش بازارهای مالی

Channel

چارتستان | آموزش بازارهای مالی

@chartestan

2 usernames

On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,073subscribers

-46 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001151948421
TypeChannel
Usernames@chartestan @chartestan_school
Description🎓 مدرسه بازارهای مالی چارتستان 📈 آموزش بورس | کریپتو | سرمایه‌گذاری 💡 آموزش رایگان، مقالات و تحلیل‌های کاربردی 🚀 از مبتدی تا معامله‌گر حرفه‌ای 🌐 Chartestan.com • کانال تحلیل بازار @ChartestanStock • پشتیبانی @ChartestanSupport
CreatedBetween 1 September 2018 and 30 April 2022 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 November 2026
Measurements held50
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/chartestan

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 73% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. This entry also forms a group of 2 channels linked by matching posts. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

No sample pairs were kept for this entry. The counts below were measured, but without the pairs there is nothing here for you to open and check, so treat the relationship as recorded rather than demonstrated.

Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@ChartestanStock15 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@ChartestanStock (13–2)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 46 comparable posts for this entry, running 25 July 2026 to 16 October 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Of the group of 2 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @chartestan — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_mutual, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Channels linked by matching posts

This channel is in a group of 2 registered channels linked by matching posts. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

7,0397,1217,0806 August 2026 — 7,119 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,119 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,121 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,119 subscribers9 August 2026 — 7,118 subscribers10 August 2026 — 7,120 subscribers12 August 2026 — 7,112 subscribers13 August 2026 — 7,106 subscribers15 August 2026 — 7,106 subscribers17 August 2026 — 7,108 subscribers18 August 2026 — 7,108 subscribers20 August 2026 — 7,112 subscribers21 August 2026 — 7,109 subscribers24 August 2026 — 7,095 subscribers24 August 2026 — 7,093 subscribers27 August 2026 — 7,088 subscribers27 August 2026 — 7,087 subscribers30 August 2026 — 7,083 subscribers30 August 2026 — 7,084 subscribers1 September 2026 — 7,088 subscribers2 September 2026 — 7,086 subscribers5 September 2026 — 7,083 subscribers8 September 2026 — 7,079 subscribers10 September 2026 — 7,067 subscribers12 September 2026 — 7,063 subscribers16 September 2026 — 7,062 subscribers18 September 2026 — 7,061 subscribers28 September 2026 — 7,039 subscribers1 October 2026 — 7,044 subscribers5 October 2026 — 7,045 subscribers8 October 2026 — 7,050 subscribers12 October 2026 — 7,048 subscribers13 October 2026 — 7,061 subscribers15 October 2026 — 7,054 subscribers16 October 2026 — 7,056 subscribers18 October 2026 — 7,061 subscribers19 October 2026 — 7,062 subscribers22 October 2026 — 7,061 subscribers24 October 2026 — 7,068 subscribers25 October 2026 — 7,070 subscribers27 October 2026 — 7,071 subscribers28 October 2026 — 7,072 subscribers30 October 2026 — 7,069 subscribers31 October 2026 — 7,064 subscribers2 November 2026 — 7,064 subscribers3 November 2026 — 7,065 subscribers5 November 2026 — 7,079 subscribers6 November 2026 — 7,080 subscribers9 November 2026 — 7,078 subscribers9 November 2026 — 7,073 subscribers7,0736 August 20269 November 2026
50 measurements spanning 96 days, net -46. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,027–7,133 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 50
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Nov 2026, 22:197,073-5
9 Nov 2026, 00:417,078-2
6 Nov 2026, 03:077,080+1
5 Nov 2026, 07:187,079+14
3 Nov 2026, 04:177,065+1
2 Nov 2026, 12:467,064no change
31 Oct 2026, 08:577,064-5
30 Oct 2026, 06:267,069-3
28 Oct 2026, 01:287,072+1
27 Oct 2026, 11:197,071+1
25 Oct 2026, 11:297,070+2
24 Oct 2026, 02:467,068+7
22 Oct 2026, 21:217,061-1
19 Oct 2026, 20:457,062+1
18 Oct 2026, 10:217,061+5
16 Oct 2026, 14:557,056+2
15 Oct 2026, 16:547,054-7
13 Oct 2026, 17:467,061+13
12 Oct 2026, 11:277,048-2
8 Oct 2026, 04:187,050first reading

Engagement

52 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 30 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
18.7%
avg views ÷ 7,073 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,320
1 post measured
Reaction rate
0.606%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 52 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 October 2026
Posts held52 (25 July 2026 – 16 October 2026)
Views total1,320
Reactions total8
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 17:56 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
197
Videos
56
Links
224

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
2h 38m
Average length
7m 55s

Measured directly from 20 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

307 reactions across 51 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤19463.2%
👍4113.4%
🔥247.82%
😍103.26%
🤩103.26%
👌82.61%
😁82.61%
💯41.30%
⚡30.977%
🎉20.651%
😢20.651%
👀10.326%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 51 of the 52 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 307 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 52 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 16 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 1 post held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

16 Oct 2026, 07:32 UTC≈1,320 views8 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

✅ #اسمارتکس_در_کریپتو ✅مدرس استاد #اورکا_احتشام ✅فصل هفتم دوره «اورکا احتشام» منتشر شد! 📚 موضوع این قسمت: Strong Range (رنج قدرتمند) در این قسمت از دوره استمارتکس اورکا با مفهوم Strong Range آشنا می‌شیم و یاد می‌گیریم چطور رنج‌های قدرتمند رو در نمودار شناسایی کنیم و از اون‌ها برای تحلیل بهتر ساختار قیمت و تصمیم‌گیری‌های معاملاتی استفاده کنیم. 📊 🎯 قسمت هفتم هم‌اکنون در دسترس دانشجویان دوره قرار گرفته است. 🔗 مشاه…

❤7🤩1

29 Sept 2026, 11:19 UTC≈1,820 views7 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @ChartestanStock

💎#پیشنهاد_شخصی دوستان ما یه سری گروه تحلیلی داریم بورس،فارکس، صندوق ها، رمز ارزها توی این گروه ها تحلیل هر نماد رو مجزا و تایپک بندی شده قرار میدیم و هر وقت قیمت به محدوده های خرید یا فروش میرسه هم الارم میدیم که دیگه هی نخواین پای چارت بشینید. اگه دارید آموزش می‌بینید یا اگه تحلیل باکیفیت و منطقی سهام و ارزهاتون رو میخواین میتونین روی این تحلیل‌ها حساب کنید و از همه مهمتر تو این شرایط اقتصادی اگه میخواین هزینه زی…

❤6😁1

28 Sept 2026, 11:09 UTC≈1,710 views4 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @ChartestanStockVoice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

❤4

28 Sept 2026, 11:09 UTC≈1,650 views9 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @ChartestanStockPhoto

گرم طلای 18 عیار تارگت بعدی 27 هست اگه اینجا ستاپ چرخش نده تا 27 میره اونجا کارش سخت میشه واسه بالا رفتن ورود هم نداره فعلا

❤9

28 Sept 2026, 11:09 UTC≈1,610 views3 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @ChartestanStockVoice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

❤3

28 Sept 2026, 11:09 UTC≈1,420 views7 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @ChartestanStockPhoto

دلار 246 رو باید ببینه بعدش در مورد تارگت های بعد صحبت میکنیم اون باکس ابی که یه استرانگ رنج هست میگه حالا حالا ها اب خوش از گلومون پایین نمیره

❤7

25 Sept 2026, 16:59 UTCviews —

چارتستان | آموزش بازارهای مالی pinned «🍂 جشنواره مهر کلاب تحلیل مالی چارتستان شروع شد! 🔥 این بار گفتیم یه فرصت کوچیک هم برای اونایی بذاریم که هنوز نمی‌دونن کلاب به کارشون میاد یا نه! 😁 پس برای جشنواره مهر، هم پلن کوتاه‌مدت داریم، هم یه پیشنهاد ویژه برای اشتراک‌های طولانی‌تر 👇🏻 🎯 پلن‌های جشنواره…»

25 Sept 2026, 16:59 UTC≈1,660 views6 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @ChartestanStock

🍂 جشنواره مهر کلاب تحلیل مالی چارتستان شروع شد! 🔥 این بار گفتیم یه فرصت کوچیک هم برای اونایی بذاریم که هنوز نمی‌دونن کلاب به کارشون میاد یا نه! 😁 پس برای جشنواره مهر، هم پلن کوتاه‌مدت داریم، هم یه پیشنهاد ویژه برای اشتراک‌های طولانی‌تر 👇🏻 🎯 پلن‌های جشنواره مهر: 💎 اشتراک ۶۰ روزه | ۸۹۰,۰۰۰ تومان 🎁 جشنواره مهر → ۱۲۰ روز عضویت یعنی با هزینه اشتراک ۶۰ روزه، ۶۰ روز بیشتر همراه کلاب هستید. 🚀 اشتراک ۱۲۰ روزه | ۱,۵۹۰,۰۰…

❤4👍2

22 Sept 2026, 22:11 UTC≈1,400 views2 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @ChartestanStockPhoto

🆕 🆕 🆕 آپدیت تحلیل‌ سهام مستعد بورس ایران به صورت کامل انجام شد — 1 مهرماه 1405 نمادهای زیر امروز با تحلیل جدید به‌روزرسانی شدند: 💎شاخص کل 💎شاخص هم وزن 🔹فارس 🔹شپنا 🔹شبندر 🔹فولاد 🔹فملی 🔹وبملت 🔹خودرو 🔹شستا 🔹تاپیکو 🔹وتجارت 🔹خساپا 🔹اخابر 🔹بوعلی 🔹شتران 🔹کگل 🔹فزر 🔹اروند 🔹درازک 🔹نوری 🔹وغدیر 🔹شپدیس 🔹پارسان در هر تاپیک، نقاط ورود و خروج، سناریوهای محتمل بازار و جزئیات دقیق تحلیل بررسی و توضیح داده شده است. ✔️#چارتست…

❤2

21 Sept 2026, 07:35 UTC≈1,310 views3 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @ChartestanStock

خیلی واضح یه چیزی بگم؟ اگر عضو گروه‌های تخصصی تحلیل چارتستان باشین اونوقت میدونید دگ چه سهمی از بازار رو‌ کی باید بفروشین کی باید نگه‌دارین و چه زمانی خرید کنین..🙂 شرکت در گروه های تحلیلی از طریق ربات زیر : @Chartestanvip_bot

👍2😁1

16 Sept 2026, 06:08 UTC≈2,080 views7 reactionsread 11 November 2026

سلام بچه‌ها چطورین👋🏻 این فقط یکی از تحلیل‌هاییه که داخل کلاب تحلیل مالی چارتستان منتشر و آپدیت میشه اگه می‌خوای تحلیل نمادها و بازارهای بیشتری رو مستمر دنبال کنی عضویت در کلاب تحلیل چارتستان @Chartestanvip_bot

👍5😁2

16 Sept 2026, 06:07 UTC≈1,640 views4 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @ChartestanStockVideo

️ تحلیل جدید نفت برنت منتشر شد! ❓نفت برنت از اینجا چه مسیری رو در پیش داره؟ در این تحلیل، ساختار فعلی قیمت، لول‌های مهم و سناریوهای احتمالی حرکت بعدی رو بررسی کردیم. 📊 اگه نفت رو دنبال می‌کنید، تحلیل جدید رو از دست ندید؛ چون محدوده‌های مهم روی چارت مشخص شده 🟠 برای دریافت تحلیل‌های تخصصی و اطلاع از خدمات چارتستان: @Chartestanvip_bot

❤3🎉1

Showing the 12 most recent of 52 posts we hold for @chartestan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

28 Jul 2026, 05:49 UTCAnonymous Quiz184 voters

📊 از تحلیل‌های نماد وبملت رضایت داشتید؟

  1. بله، کاملا🤩75%
  2. دوس دارم تحلیل مابقی نمادها رو هم ببینم، چطور می‌تونم عضو‌ vip چارتستان بشم؟😃25%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 52 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 16 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

پرورش افکار مثبت
@parvaresheafkaremosbat · 22,719
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 19 September 2026
پیکنیک آموزش
@piknikanalyst_educations · 66,773
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 21 August 2026
👨‍⚕️حقایق پزشکی 📚
@fact_pezeshki · 52,978
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 24 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“چارتستان | آموزش بازارهای مالی” (@chartestan), 7,073 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chartestan.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.