Говоришь правду типа я в душе не люблю когда будет рост — отписываются, пиздишь как ленин и корчишь из себя мегатрутрейдера9000 — +100500 подписок в час. Ясно.
😁10💯2🔥2

Channel
@chartanalman
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
314subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001483072181 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @chartanalman |
| Description | админ @romulechka_elliott чат @BigFishBook VK https://vk.com/satoshinakamoto08 ВИП https://t.me/chartanalman/1040 Самый дешевый впн @rknfcker |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/chartanalman |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:17 | 314 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:57 | 314 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 1 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
194 reactions across 18 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 80 | 41.2% | |
| 🔥 | 38 | 19.6% | |
| 😁 | 19 | 9.79% | |
| 👍 | 14 | 7.22% | |
| 💯 | 8 | 4.12% | |
| 🍌 | 7 | 3.61% | |
| 💔 | 5 | 2.58% | |
| 😱 | 4 | 2.06% | |
| 🤔 | 4 | 2.06% | |
| 🌚 | 2 | 1.03% | |
| 👌 | 2 | 1.03% | |
| 👾 | 2 | 1.03% | |
| 😍 | 2 | 1.03% | |
| 🌭 | 1 | 0.515% | |
| 🍾 | 1 | 0.515% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.515% | |
| 👻 | 1 | 0.515% | |
| 😎 | 1 | 0.515% | |
| 🤪 | 1 | 0.515% | |
| 🦄 | 1 | 0.515% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 194reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 March 2026 to 9 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Говоришь правду типа я в душе не люблю когда будет рост — отписываются, пиздишь как ленин и корчишь из себя мегатрутрейдера9000 — +100500 подписок в час. Ясно.
😁10💯2🔥2
https://www.tradingview.com/x/ej26JxCg/ #BTC Когда будет рост? Я знаю! Неочевидный ответ под катом: После того ка закончится падение
🔥7
Милано чат дропнул? @BigFishBook Если что залетайте, мой чат тоже мертв
💔5
https://www.tradingview.com/x/PXv8M0bR/ #BTC Будет рост, но при условии что не будем падать.
❤2😁2👎1😎1
Я про крипту, проказники мои
🤔1🤪1😁1
Чо, я смотрю дилдаки возвращаются?
🍌7👍2😁2🌭1
https://www.tradingview.com/x/FfY4kfQs/ #BTC собрали диагональ. ждем коррекцию и наверх
🔥9
https://www.tradingview.com/x/mEcyZqp3/ #RGBI Без изменений
🔥7
https://www.tradingview.com/x/XqBsPBtL/ #MOEX Ну уж извиняйте🤷♂️
🔥4
https://www.tradingview.com/x/AG7Gf1pk/ #BTC Подтверждаем диагональ. ждем рост осенью-зимой
🔥8👍3😱1
https://www.tradingview.com/x/cIwjb4RJ/ #BTC Выскажу контртрендовую и контринтуитивную теорию, а вы хотите — бейте, хотите — нет. Мы все еще находимся в зарождении бычьего цикла. то есть мы на протяжении трех лет формируем серию заходных волн, поэтому нихера и не растет. Альты пампятся только в конце бычки, а в первой половине они умирают . Все медвежьи сценарии у меня развалились.
❤15🌚2👌2😱2
Канал умер потому что рынок полтора года во флете. Ваш кэп.
❤10👍4😁3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @chartanalman. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 892,506 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Волны с Романом Александровичем” (@chartanalman), 314 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chartanalman.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.