Channel
@characters_are_fictitious
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
374subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002159774685 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @characters_are_fictitious |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/characters_are_fictitious |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 07:28 | 374 | +2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:19 | 372 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:47 | 372 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 11 (27 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,334 |
| Reactions total | 514 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 06:19 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
514 reactions across 11 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5415763879751863367 | 165 | 32.1% | |
| custom 5469968196683440499 | 157 | 30.5% | |
| custom 5258192279964766556 | 112 | 21.8% | |
| 😁 | 37 | 7.20% | |
| custom 5415586007976267852 | 30 | 5.84% | |
| custom 5357104796971056712 | 13 | 2.53% |
Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 514reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Птицева во Владивостоке! Лечу на неделю, планов уже куча, но 16 августа в 13:00 брошу все праздношатания, чтобы встретиться с вами на фестивале «Игры слов». Подробности тут - https://t.me/igraslovbookstore/9972
custom 52581922799647665569custom 54699681966834404997custom 54157638797518633673
Владивосток тоже бросает все свои праздношатания (да же??) и идет на Птицеву! 😡
custom 541576387975186336723custom 525819227996476655619😁12
🎞️🎞️ хоть неделя меня и ушатала, но что-то там немножко читала → Край, Гэ Фэй -- читаю к встрече клуба, и это та категория книг, за которые по собственному желанию я бы не взялась 🙂 «Старик просыпается, смотрит в окно, ждет чего-то, не ждет ничего, засыпает. И вспоминает, вспоминает, вспоминает». Это Китай. А у меня с китайской литературой по прежнему не очень. Но с точки зрения истории Китая XX века интересно -- на…
custom 546996819668344049921custom 541576387975186336719😁6
погуляла по сайтам издательств 🗽 #предзаказы Провалы, Ольга Птицева После автомобильной аварии гиперчувствительная Соня начинает испытывать чужие эмоции. Они ощущаются как дуновение ледяного ветра, мелкие частицы песка, навалившийся на плечи груз. Выписавшись из больницы, Соня выясняет, что пропала ее кровная сестра Ольга, — и встречает еще двух человек, которые видят и слышат то, чего в действительности, казалось б…
custom 541576387975186336725custom 546996819668344049922custom 52581922799647665566
слава богу, мимо 😳😦😯
😁19custom 52581922799647665562custom 54157638797518633671
Обсуждали “Голод” Светланы Павловой, пили чай (и кофе тоже пили) в саду. Когда расстраиваешься, что вокруг мало читают современную русскоязычную прозу и начинаешь заставлять людей лично 🐸 Следующая “Крууга” Анны Лужбиной 👀
custom 541576387975186336715custom 546996819668344049911custom 52581922799647665567
и правда удивительно
custom 525819227996476655614custom 541576387975186336711custom 54699681966834404998
💋 В июле было 9 книг - все кайф, кроме одной 😁 эгэйн Всклянь, Коля Андреев — посмотреть, какие книги получаются у супер позитивных авторов, сгружающих своих (чужих?) внутренних демонов на странички. Мои друзья, Хишам Матар — разобраться, как по-разному одно и то же травмирующее событие (допустим, обстрел у ливийского посольства в Лондоне) может повлиять на трех людей. (а вместо отзыва еще раз посмотрите на наши за…
custom 541576387975186336722custom 525819227996476655618custom 546996819668344049918
я утром: это что, сегодня нет дождя? я в 14:29: 🩴
custom 525819227996476655622custom 541576387975186336721custom 546996819668344049918
«Стрим», Ивана Шипнигова -- это как ехать в плацкарте и невольно слушать разговоры всех пассажиров сразу. Сначала дико бесит этот гул и чужая глупость, потом начинает смешить, а ближе к финалу понимаешь, что все эти карикатурные персонажи стали уже почти родными ❤️ ▶️Фишка книги в необычной форме. Текст собран из монологов примерно десятка очень разных людей -- от жесткого эконома Лешеньки до филологической девы Нас…
custom 541576387975186336725custom 546996819668344049923custom 525819227996476655615
дочитала «Развод», Сьюзен Таубес. всю дорогу пыталась понять, при чем тут развод. а потом поняла, что это вообще не то чтобы про брак. вернее, не только Главная героиня, Софи Блайнд, уже мертва -- вот прям сразу ее сбивает такси на одной из улиц Парижа. Из некоего пространства между жизнью и смертью она прогоняет все, что напрожила. В этом хорроре сознания сначала пытаешься найти хоть какую-то опору, а потом понимае…
custom 541558600797626785230custom 546996819668344049929custom 535710479697105671213
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @characters_are_fictitious. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 884,785 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“персонажи вымышлены” (@characters_are_fictitious), 374 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/characters_are_fictitious.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.